10558
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 113, No. 23, 15 December 2000
J. Kohel and J. W. Keto
tation wavelengths to determine the vibrational distributions
in the excimer product. Significant vibrational population in-
version is observed in the excimer resulting from the LAR.
From analysis of the measured XeCl(B–X) fluorescence
pears to be a significant feature of the LAR, even when ac-
counting for additional relaxation due to the higher pressures
in the current study. The exit channels in both the laser-
assisted and quenching reactions involve the XeϩClϪ CTS,
͕
͖
2
so this apparent difference in energy disposal was
previously8 attributed to the presence of different pathways
for the two reactions.
spectra we determined the mean vibrational energy E in
͗
͘
v
the newly formed Xe–Cl bond to be approximately 0.5 eV
(3900 cmϪ1) for the reaction resulting from laser excitation
wavelength of 313.5 nm.
E
increases to approximately
͘
͗
v
1.1 eV (9100 cmϪ1) for the reaction at 288.5 nm. Further-
more, we found an increasing fraction of the available en-
ergy from the reaction appears as vibration in the excimer
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of
Education, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of
Chemical Sciences and the Robert A. Welch Foundation.
*
product XeCl as the laser is tuned from redmost ͑ f
͗
͘
ex
V
Ϸ0.3 at 313.5 nm͒ to bluer wavelengths ͑ f Ϸ0.5 for
͗
͘
V
р306 nm͒. As illustrated in Fig. 7, this transition is sudden
with increasing exoergicity for the reaction. This sudden in-
crease in vibrational energy disposal is also evident in the
sequence of spectra shown in Fig. 1.
APPENDIX: POTENTIAL REPRESENTATIONS
The upper and lower potentials used in the simulations
of the excimer emission were taken from Sur et al.37 and the
molecular scattering studies of Aquilanti et al.,38 respec-
tively, with slight modifications as necessary to accurately
simulate emission spectra from both thermal and highly ex-
cited vibrational distributions in the upper state. The
XeCl(X) ground state potential was unmodified, while the
vertical position of the XeCl(B) excited state potential was
The high degree of vibrational excitation observed in the
*
XeCl product in the current experiment is qualitatively con-
sistent with the previous observations by Setser and co-
workers for the LAR of XeϩCl2 collision pairs. The signifi-
cant variation in degree of vibrational excitation over the
wide range of excitation wavelengths, however, is clearly
demonstrated for the first time in the present work. We at-
tribute the increasing vibrational energy disposal to a varia-
tion of initial conditions on the reactive V(Xeϩ;Cl2Ϫ) poten-
tial energy surface, as discussed. We note, however, that
while this predicted trend toward greater vibrational energy
disposal with decreasing laser wavelength is clearly demon-
strated in the current experiment, the same trend may not
necessarily be exhibited in similar experiments in supersonic
jets or in solid matrixes, due to the restricted geometries and
cage effects in the in vdW complexes and in the solid matrix.
While gross dynamical trends may be inferred from the
present work, deconvolution of the data to reveal individual
reactive trajectories is far more difficult. A more detailed
analysis, furthermore, must consider complications due to a
distribution of initial ͑kinetic and internal͒ energies and ori-
entations in the reagents. Nonetheless, the above conclusions
are believed to be qualitatively correct. Numerical calcula-
tions of classical trajectories on the reactive PES using
Monte Carlo sampling techniques to integrate over a distri-
bution of initial conditions are also in reasonable agreement
with the observed product state outcomes.36 These conclu-
sions differ slightly from that of Setser and co-workers, who
calculate that the majority of collision pairs are found in
bound levels of the shallow vdW potential ͑nb /nfϭ0.86 at
300 K͒ and conclude that the width of the excitation spec-
trum ͑0.4 eV͒ is largely determined by the gradient in the
Cl–ClϪ coordinate of the PES.8 This interpretation, however,
would fail to account for the significant variation in energy
disposal observed in the present work or, for that matter, the
dramatic difference in energy disposal observed for the LAR
in gas phase studies and in molecular beam experiments
where the initial geometry may be more restricted.
determined by the XeCl(B–X) 00 transition energy (00)
͓
ϭ32 495Ϯ1 cmϪ1 measured by Jouvet et al. in a free jet.39
͔
The upper potential was then shifted relative to the lower
potential along R in order to accurately simulate the
vibrationally-relaxed emission measured in high pressure
Xe/Cl2 gas mixtures ͑1430 Torr Xe, 10 Torr Cl2͒. And fi-
nally, the upper repulsive wall was adjusted slightly to give
agreement with the oscillations in the blue wing of vibra-
tionally excited low pressure emission spectra observed by
Setser and co-workers40 following the reactive quenching of
Xe(6s, 3P2) by Cl2. The modified upper potential was recast
in the form of a truncated Rittner potential,
V
R͒ϭa exp ϪR/b͒ϪC /RϪC /R4ϩd,
͑A1͒
͑
͑
Ј
1
4
and the shape of this potential was verified by comparing the
calculated eigenenergies to measured values37 for the lowest
dozen vibrational levels.
The XeCl(B–X) transition moment is a slowly varying
function of R with a maximum near RЈe . The ab initio tran-
sition moment of Hay and Dunning,41 however, required
slight modification for the best simulation of spectra origi-
nating from distributions including large vibrational quanta
͑which sample transitions at large R͒. The transition moment
was represented in this work by the function
exp Ϫ␥ RϪc ͒
͔
1
͓
͑
R͒ϭc
.
͑A2͒
͑
e
0
1ϪR/c ͒2ϩc
͑
1
2
Parameters for the above transition moment function were
adjusted so that the overall ‘‘envelope’’ of the simulated
TABLE II. Parameters for the XeCl(B) Rittner potential function.
We have noted also that vibrational energy disposal in
the LAR appears to be significantly less in the current ex-
periment than that in the quenching reactions of metastable
C1
a
b
͑Å͒
C4
d
(105 cmϪ1 Å)
(107 cmϪ1
)
(105 cmϪ1 Å4)
(cmϪ1
)
2.185
0.387
1.177
5.456
68 987
Xe with Cl2 studied by Setser et al.28 This difference ap-
*
132.174.255.116 On: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:43:47