Hydrogenation of Citral
FULL PAPERS
ꢀ 3.5% and 1% for bimetallic and monometallic catalysts,
Phase Behavior Studies
respectively.
The phase behavior of the system under the reaction condition
was observed at 323 Kusing a 10 mL high-pressure viewing cell
containing citral, CO2 and H2. The same pressure controller as
used for the hydrogenation experiment was used to regulate
the pressure inside the viewing cell. Citral (0.2 g) was
introduced into the viewing cell at a constant hydrogen
pressure of 4 MPa and the CO2 pressure was in the range of
7.0 to 17.0 MPa. Amagnetic stirrer stirred the content inside
the viewing cell.
Catalyst Characterization Techniques
All the catalysts were primarily characterized by X-ray
diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The X-ray
diffraction pattern was recorded on a Rigaku-RAD-X system
using monochromatized Cu Ka radiation (l 1.542 ä). In
general, the diffraction data were collected using the contin-
uous scan mode with a scan speed of 2 deg/min over the scan
range 2q 2 158. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
of the calcined material was performed on a JEOL JEM-2000
EX (II) operating at 200 kV. Calcined samples were deposited
on a grid with a holey carbon copper film. The powder was
suspended in ethanol by the ultrasonic method and a drop of
this solution was placed on the support film. X-ray photo-
electron spectra (XPS) were obtained with an Ulvac Phi 5601
spectrometer using Mg Ka (1253.6 eV) radiation of twin
anodes in the constant analyzer mode with a pass energy of
50 eV. The X-ray power was limited to 14.0 kVand 400 W. The
binding energy was determined by referencing to the Si 2p
binding energy of 104.3 eV. The spectrum was fitted to the
Gaussian spectra of Pt 4f7/2, Pt 4f5/2 and Ru3d3/2, Ru 3d5/2 by
optimizing the peak heights and positions assuming the fixed
peak-to-peak difference at 3.30 eV.
References
[1] K. Bauer, D. Garbe, Common Fragrances and Flavor
Materials, VCH, Weinheim, 1985.
[2] a) U. K. Singh, M. A. Vannice, J. Catal. 2001, 199, 73 84;
b) P. Reyes, H. Rojas, G. Pecchi, J. L. G. Fierro, J. Mol.
Catal. A 2002, 179, 293 299; c) C. Milone, M. L.
Tropeano, G. Gulino, G. Neri, R. Ingoglia, S. Galvagno,
Chem. Commun. 2002, 868 869.
[3] G. Lafaye, C. Micheaud-Especel, C. Montassier, P.
Marecol, Appl. Catal. A 2002, 230, 19 30.
[4] A. M. Silva, O. A. A. Santos, M. J. Mendes, E. Joradao,
M. A. Fraga, Appl. Catal. A 2003, 241, 155 164.
¬
[5] M. A. Aramendia, V. Borau, C. Jimenez, J. M. Marinas,
J. R. Ruiz, F. J. Urbano, J. Mol. Catal. A 2001, 171, 153
158.
[6] U. K. Singh, M. A. Vannice, J. Catal. 2000, 191, 165 180.
[7] A. Wismeijer, A. Kieboom, H. van Bekkum, Appl. Catal.
1986, 25, 181.
[8] a) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, Nature 1994, 368,
231 233; b) P. G. Jessop, Y. Hsiano, T. Ikariya, R.
Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 344 355.
[9] A. F¸rstner, D. Koch, K. Langemann, W. Leitner, C. Six,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 2466 2469.
[10] a) A. Baiker, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 453 473. b) M. G.
Hitzler, F. R. Smail, S. K. Ross, M. Poliakoff, Org.
Process Res. Dev. 1998, 2, 137 146.
[11] G. I. Childs, A. I. Cooper, T. F. Nolan, M. J. Carrott,
M. W. George, M. Poliakoff, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 6857 6866.
[12] U. R. Pillai, E. Sahle-Demessie, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
2003, 42, 6688 6696.
General Procedure for the Hydrogenation of Citral in
scCO2
The hydrogenation of citral was carried out in a stainless steel
batch reactor (50 mL). 0.1 g of catalyst and the reactant
(6.5 mmol) were loaded into the reactor. Then the reactor was
sealed and flushed two times with 2 MPa of CO2 to remove the
air. After flushing, the reactor was maintained at a reaction
temperature of 323 K. Aprescribed amount of hydrogen was
first loaded into the reactor. Liquid CO2 was charged into the
reactor using a high-pressure liquid pump, and then com-
pressed to the desired pressure. Pressure was kept constant by a
back-pressure regulator. The hydrogen and the reaction
mixture were stirred continuously with a Teflon-coated
magnetic bar during the reaction. After the reaction, the
reactor was cooled in ice/water and depressurized carefully by
the backpressure regulator. The liquid mixture was identified
by GC/MS and analyzed quantitatively by GC (HP 5890)
equipped with a flame ionization detector. Quantification of
the products was obtained by a multipoint calibration curve for
each product. For recycle studies the catalyst was separated
from the reactant and product then recharged with fresh
reactant. The hydrogenation in organic solvents has also been
performed by the above method using conventional organic
solvents (10 mL) instead of CO2. The selectivity to each
product was calculated by the following expression
Si Ci/SCp, where Ci is the concentration of the product −i×
and SCp is the total concentration of the product.
[13] M. Chatterjee, Y. Ikushima, FY. Zhao, New Journal of
Chemistry 2003, 27, 510 513.
[14] a) J. F. Moulder, W. F. Sticklle, P. E. Sobol, K. D. Bomb-
en, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy,
(Eds.: J. Chastain, R. C. King Jr.), Physical Electronics
Inc., Minnesota, USA, 1995; b) K. S. Kim, N. Winograd,
R. E. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 6296 6297.
[15] a) M. Chatterjee, Y. Ikushima, FY. Zhao, Catal. Lett.
2002, 82, 141 144; b) B. M. Bhanage; Y. Ikushima; M.
Shirai, M. Arai, Catal. Lett. 1999, 62, 175 177; c) F.
Zhao, Y. Ikushima, M. Shirai, T. Ebina, M. Arai, J. Mol.
Catal. 2002, 180, 259 265.
[16] M. Arai, Y. Nishiyama, Y. Ikushima, J. Supercrit. Fluids
1998, 13, 149 153.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 459 466
asc.wiley-vch.de
¹ 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
465