observed from the 1H resonances at δ 8.36 and 8.37 (H-8′′)
to nonprotonated carbon resonances at δ 126.0 (C-5′′) and
148.7 (C-4′′) and to the furanose anomeric carbon at 86.6
(C-1′′′), and from the furanose anomeric proton at δ 6.47
(H-1′′′) to the nonprotonated carbon at 148.7 (C-4′′) and the
C-8′′ carbon at 141.0, consistent with attachment of the de-
oxypentose fragment via the anomeric carbon C-1′′′ to N-9′′
of the purine, typical of a purine nucleoside. The remaining
proton resonances assigned to the purine residue at δ 8.07
and 8.14 (H-2′′) showed HMBC correlations to carbon reson-
ances at δ 148.7 (C-4′′) and 158.7 (C-6′′), which completed
the 13C NMR assigment of the purine fragment. Comparison
of the 13C chemical shift assignments for this fragment to
literature values for the purine residues of known oxygenated-
purine nucleosides revealed a near identical resemblance to
N-1 alkylated inosines.5 This suggested that the constitution
of avinosol (1) involved a bond between N-1′′ of the purine
fragment and C-3′ of the hydroquinone fragment.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Avinosol (1) and 3′-Aminoavarone
(2) from Avarol (5)
the C-6′′ carbonyl might play an important role in creating
the barrier to rotation about the N-1′′/C-3′ bond in avinosol
(1).
2D NOESY correlations were observed between H-1′′′ (δ
6.47) and both H-4′′′ (δ 4.04) and H-2R′′′ (δ 2.48), and be-
tween H-2â′′′ (δ 2.77) and H-3′′′ (δ 4.57), consistent with a
ribose linked â to N-9′′. The NOESY data also confirmed that
the relative configurations in the sesquiterpenoid fragment
were identical to those in avarol (5), thereby completing the
proposed structure for 1 as shown. It is assumed that twinning
of the proton resonances assigned to H-4′, H-2′′ and H-8′′,
and several of the resonances assigned to carbon atoms in this
region of the molecule, is due to the existence of atropisomers
resulting from hindered rotation around the N1′′-C-3′ bond.
The H-4′ (δ 6.57 and 6.55) and H-2′′ (δ 8.07 and 8.14) reson-
ances show the greatest difference in chemical shifts in the two
isomers, in agreement with this assumption. An absence of any
twinning of the 1H resonances assigned to the ribose fragment
supports the N-1′′ to C-3′ linkage rather than the alternative
N-3′′ to C-3′ linkage. Elevated temperature NMR experi-
ments undertaken in an attempt to measure the magnitude
of the N-3′′/C-3′ rotational barrier led to decomposition of
avinosol (1) before the coalescence temperature was reached.
3′-Aminoavarone (2) was isolated as a red oil that gave a
[M + Na]+ ion at m/z 350.2097 in the HRESIMS appropriate
for a molecular formula of C21H29NO2 (calcd for C21H29-
NO2Na, 350.2096). Analysis of the NMR data obtained for
2 (Supporting Information) readily identified the 3′ substi-
tuted avarone substructure found in the semisynthetic
compound 6. The molecular formula of 2 required that the
3′ substituent was an amino group. To confirm the structure
of 2, avarone (4) was reacted with Me3SiN3 in refluxing
EtOH for 24 h to give a mixture of 3′-aminoavarone (2) and
4′-aminoavarone, that could be separated by HPLC.7 The
synthetic 3′-aminoavarone (2) was identical by TLC, NMR,
and MS comparison with the natural product.
The 3′-phenethylaminoavarone analogue 3 was isolated
as a red oil that gave a [M + Na]+ ion at m/z 454.2726 in
the HRESIMS consistent with a molecular formula of C29H37-
NO2 (calcd for C29H37NO2Na, 454.2722). The NMR data for
3 (Supporting Information) also contained resonances that
could be assigned to the 3′-substituted avarone substructure
found in avarone (4) and 3′-aminoavarone (2). An isolated
1H spin system consisting of two scalar coupled methylene
resonances (δ 2.93, t, J ) 7 Hz, H-3′′; 3.35, q, J ) 7 Hz,
H-2′′) and a broad one proton resonance at δ 5.67 (NH-1′′)
was identified in the COSY data. The δ 5.67 resonance was
correlated to the H-2′′ resonance in the COSY spectrum but
not correlated to a carbon resonance in the HSQC spectrum.
A second isolated spin system in the 1H NMR spectrum could
be assigned to a monosubstituted phenyl ring (δ 7.21, d, J
) 7.3 Hz, H-5′′/H-9′′; 7.24, t, J ) 7.3 Hz, H-7′′; 7.32, t, J
) 7.3 Hz, H-6′′/H-8′′). In the HMBC spectrum, the H-2′′ (δ
3.35) and H-3′′ (δ 2.93) resonances were both correlated to
the C-4′′ resonance at δ 139.0, demonstrating that C-3′′ was
attached to the phenyl ring and, therefore, that N-1′′ was
attached to C-3′ of the avarone fragment as shown in 3.
The pure meroterpenoids 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 were tested in
the antiinvasion assay against two human tumor cell lines
To confirm the proposed structure of avinosol (1), the nat-
ural product was synthesized from avarone (4) and 2′-deoxy-
inosine as shown in Scheme 1. Avarone (4) was prepared in
quantitative yield by oxidation of naturally occurring avarol
(5),6 obtained from the Dysidea sp. extract, with MnO2 in
Et2O at room temperature for 10 min. Reaction of avarone
(4) with 2′-deoxyinosine in DMF and K2CO3 at room temper-
ature for 30 min gave avinosol (1) in 22% yield.5 The syn-
thetic material was identical to the natural product by TLC,
NMR, and MS comparison, confirming the proposed constitu-
tion and the absolute configuration shown. Synthetic avinosol
(1) was determined to have [R]22D ) -26.9° (c 0.35, MeOH).
Avinosol (1) slowly oxidized to the corresponding quinone
avinosone (6) upon exposure to air. There was no evidence
for atropisomers in the NMR data obtained for 6. This
suggests that hydrogen bonding between the C-2′ phenol and
(5) Narukulla, R.; Shuker, D. E. G.; Xu, Y.-Z. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005,
33, 1767-1778.
(6) Ling, T.; Xiang, A. X.; Theodorakis, E. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1999, 38, 3089-3091.
(7) Cozzolino, R.; De Giulio, A.; De Rosa, S.; Strazzullo, G.; Gasic, M.
J.; Sladic, D.; Zlatovic, J. Nat. Prod. 1990, 53, 699-702.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 17, 2006
3751