Chemistry of Materials
Article
constructed sample, the effect of interfacial resistance is twice
as large as compared to the cell with only one cathode|
electrolyte interface. In order to get interfacial resistance
through the single cathode|electrolyte interface, Figure 8 shows
the plots of Rinterface/2 for cathode|electrolyte interfacial
resistance for the as-deposited sample and the sample annealed
at 300 °C and of (Rinterface1 + Rinterface2)/2 for the samples
annealed at 500 and 700 °C.
As can be seen in Figure 8, the area-specific resistance
(ASR) increases with annealing temperature. The obtained
ASR arising from the interface or from the interface reactions,
for as-deposited, 300, and 500 °C treated samples are 1.4, 1.7,
and 2.1, respectively. Notably, ASR increases dramatically to
102 kΩ cm2 when the sample was annealed at 700 °C. This fits
well with the findings from XANES, EXAFS, and XRD that
major interfacial chemical and structural degradation takes
place at 700 °C. Formation of phases that do not conduct Li
ions, such as La2Zr2O7, La(Ni,Co)O3, and Li2CO3, is expected
to increase the ASR at the interface.21
needed for Li+/Ni2+ exchange is lower than that for Li+/Co3+
or Li+/Mn4+ exchange. The calculated formation energies for
the NiLi−LiNi, CoLi−LiCo, and MnLi−LiMn antisite pairs in
LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 are 0.57, 1.42, and 2.60 eV, respec-
tively.58 Moreover, Ni has a low migration barrier, ∼0.25 eV,
once it migrates into the Li site by Li+/Ni2+ exchange.59 This
value is on the same order of migration barrier of Li in layered
oxide cathodes.59−62 Solid-state reaction between two phases
in contact requires flux of elements toward the interface. As Ni
is the most mobile transition metal species in the NMC lattice,
Ni flux will be larger than Co and Mn. For this reason, if there
is an external chemical driver for reaction, we expect that Ni
will more readily migrate to the interface and participate in the
reaction.
The result suggests that increasing Ni content in the layered
oxide to obtain a high power and high capacity cell can lead to
inferior interfacial instability. Ni-rich cathode is already well
known to react with organic electrolyte and form SEI.63 Our
work is the first experimental demonstration that the same
problem exists in this all solid system, too.
EXAFS analysis for Mn coordination was not possible
because of the overlap of La L1 edge and Mn K edge, but XRD
and oxidation state analysis indicated no detectable reactivity
of Mn in our system. There were no Mn-containing secondary
phases detected using XRD. The oxidation state of Mn did not
change after annealing as seen by Mn L-edge spectra (Figure
S1). Therefore, we conclude that Mn is not participating in the
secondary-phase formation between LLZO and NMC622 in
our experimental conditions.
The third key point we discuss here is the inconsistency
between prior computational predictions of NMC|LLZO
interfacial reactions and our experimental findings. We propose
that this is because of not having considered the elevated
temperature and gas environment effects. Xiao et al. predicted
Li5CoO4, NiO, La2O3, Li6Zr2O7, and Li2MnO3 formation for
reaction between NMC and LLZO.13 Richards et al. predicted
La2Zr2O7, Li2NiO3, and La2O3 for LiNiO2|LLZO and
La2Zr2O7, Li2MnO3, and La2O3 for LiMnO2|LLZO.19 Both
works do not predict formation of La(Ni,Co)O3 phase, and we
did not find evidence to La2O3 or to Li-rich transition metal
oxides. Most importantly, the pervasive Li2CO3 formation in
our experimental findings is missing from previous theoretical
reports. The discrepancy between our experimental results and
prior calculations could arise from two key factors. First, the
computational predictions we see in the literature13,19 have not
considered the potential role of gaseous species in the
environment, in particular CO2 and H2O(g). We find
substantial Li2CO3 formation as a sink of Li, consumed by
CO2. As a result, this process is not permitting the formation of
the predicted lithium-rich phases such as Li5CoO4, Li2NiO3,
and Li2MnO3. Li2CO3 is also responsible for the formation of
delithiated phases. These are La2Zr2O7 that precipitate from
LLZO and La(Ni,Co)O3 that can form as a reaction product
when LLZO and NMC are delithiated and become more
unstable. As neither NMC622 nor LLZO contains carbon, the
reaction requires substantial carbon influx from outside the
sample to proceed. Because we annealed the sample in air,
CO2 is the carbon source. This shows the importance of the
gas environment in the interfacial degradation. Based on this,
4. DISCUSSION
The first key point we discuss is that the secondary phases
formed due to the interfacial degradation [La2Zr2O7, La-
(Ni,Co)O3, and Li2CO3] are not Li conductors. La2Zr2O7 has
poor Li conductivity, and it is a typical secondary phase found
in delithiated LLZO.54 La(Ni,Co)O3 is not expected to be a Li
conductor. There are perovskite Li conductors such as
(Li,La)TiO3, but Li conduction requires substantial A-site
vacancy fraction.55 Li2CO3 has much poorer Li conductivity
(∼10−3 mS/cm) at room temperature compared to LLZO.56
There is a large difference in interfacial resistances of the
sample that only contains Li2CO3 after exposure to 500 °C and
that of the sample that contains Li2CO3, La2Zr2O7, and
La(Ni,Co)O3 after exposure to 700 °C. The interfacial
resistance found from the former was 2.1 kΩ cm2 and that
from the latter was 102 kΩ cm2. This proves that formation of
interfacial products [La2Zr2O7 and La(Ni,Co)O3] beyond
Li2CO3 led to a substantial degradation of the charge-transfer
properties of the interface. This explains the stark increase of
interfacial resistance for the sample annealed at 700 °C.
Complete coverage of the interface with secondary phases
[Li2CO3, La2Zr2O7, and La(Ni,Co)O3 which are poor Li
conductors] led to poor Li transfer at the interface, with 2
orders of magnitude increase in the interface impedance.
The second key point is that Ni has higher tendency than
Co to participate in the formation of La(Ni,Co)O3, as deduced
from the Ni K-edge and Co K-edge EXAFS data taken from
the sample annealed at 700 °C. The features for La(Ni,Co)O3
in the Ni K-edge EXAFS spectra indicate that a substantial
amount of Ni experienced a chemical environment change. In
contrast, the Co K-edge EXAFS spectra could be fully
explained by crystallization of the NMC film. Therefore, only
a small portion of Co in the NMC622 film participated in
perovskite formation and majority of those remained in
NMC622.
Different reaction tendencies of transition metal cations can
originate in part from their mobility in NMC lattice. With this,
we mean two processes: (i) move of the transition metal to the
Li sites and (ii) the migration of the transition metal once it
resides at the Li sublattice. Migration of transition metal
cations to the nearby octahedral site of the Li sublattice makes
them mobile in the oxide.57 Ni is able to move to the Li sites
more readily than Co and Mn in NMC because the energy
we argue that controlling the gas environment, especially PCO ,
2
during the synthesis of these interfaces is important in
achieving better stability.
H
Chem. Mater. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX