8014 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 33, 2000
Brandt et al.
The authors suggest that the active catalyst is in the +II
oxidation state and that PhINTs may act as an oxidant for Cu(I).
This was supported by experiments where treatment of the
CuOTf precatalyst with PhINTs in the absence of alkene gave
a species indistinguishable (UV-vis) from that produced with
Cu(OTf)2 under identical conditions.8
b,9
On the basis of kinetic studies using Cu(I)-bis(imine)
catalysts, Jacobsen has concluded that the reaction is strictly
first order in alkene and suggests a Cu(III)-nitrene species to
1
2
be the reactive intermediate in a Cu(I)/Cu(III) catalytic cycle.
On the other hand, P e´ rez and co-workers suggest the catalyti-
cally active species to be Cu(II) in systems with monoanionic
hydridotrispyrazolylborate ligands, thus involving a Cu(II)/Cu-
(
gII) cycle.13
The carbon-nitrogen bond formation step(s) may be either
Figure 1. Diimine 3, used in the kinetic study and systems 4a-c used
in the calculations (4b:X ) H, 4c:X ) Cl).
concerted or consecutive. P e´ rez investigated the Cu(II)-
hydridotrispyrazolylborate-catalyzed aziridination by means of
Hammet studies, which suggested a reaction between the alkene
and an electrophilic radical species. The experimental data could
functions were used for iodine (BSII). An optimized f-polarization
function was obtained by minimizing the B3LYP energy of the free
atom in the ground state, resulting in an exponent of 0.2.19 Final energies
were determined using B3LYP together with the 6-311+G(2d) for Cu,
N, O, S and C(alkene); 6-311G(d,p) was used for other atoms and BSII
for iodine (BSIII). Normal modes and zero point corrections (ZPC)
were calculated for some selected points using B3LYP/BSI.
•
be nicely fitted to a linear combination of Jackson’s σ
substituent constants and Hammet σ constants.
+
13
Counterions markedly influence the stereochemical outcome
of aziridination of (Z)-alkenes. Strongly coordinating counterions
such as acetylacetonate and chloride favor isomerization of cis-
stilbene and cis-â-methylstyrene to the trans-aziridine products,
Model System. A neutral ligand was chosen due to the high
enantioselectivities obtained using such ligands. The diimine ligand 3
possibly indicating an involvement of radical intermediates in
1
2
the system.10 In an attempt to find evidence for such species,
of Jacobsen was selected due to the published kinetic study and the
simple synthesis of this ligand.1
1,20
The calculations were performed
aziridinations were carried out using a so-called hypersensitive
radical probe as substrate. These experiments suggest a con-
certed reaction pathway for alkyl-substituted alkenes using
CuClO4 as catalyst in acetonitrile. However, cis-4-octene did
not isomerize in the same system.10 Thus, in parallel with results
for the Jacobsen epoxidation reaction,14 radicals might only be
intermediates for substrates where significant stabilization
occurs.
Further development of this reaction requires an increased
understanding of the reaction mechanism. We have therefore
performed a theoretical study using quantum chemical calcula-
tions in combination with kinetic experiments.
both on a minimal model system 4a with methyl or hydrogen as models
for the aryl moieties, and on larger systems where all aromatic moieties
were retained, 4b and c (Figure 1).
The calculations were mainly performed using Cu(I) as the initial
12
oxidation state as postulated by Jacobsen. A catalytic cycle starting
with Cu(II) reacting with PhINTs would formally yield a Cu(IV)-
nitrene species, which in our opinion seems unlikely to be a catalytically
active species. Some calculations were performed on the dicationic
Cu(II) system in order to compare its relevance with that of the Cu(I)/
Cu(III) catalytic cycle.
Kinetic Experiments. Kinetic data were obtained from the aziri-
dination of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene by (N-(p-toluenesulfonyl)imino)-
phenyliodinane (PhINTs) with a catalyst generated in situ from
Methods
Cu(CH
3 4 6
CN) PF and diimine 3, and the reaction was performed at 0-2
°C. Alkene consumption was monitored by gas chromatography, using
Computational Details. All calculations reported in this work were
conducted using the Gaussian 98 program. Geometry optimizations
were performed using the B3LYP hybrid functional, together with
n-dodecane as internal standard.
1
5
1
6
Experimental Section
1
7
the LANL2DZ ECP and basis set (BSI). Intermediate energies were
determined using B3LYP together with the 6-311+G(d) for Cu, N, O,
S and alkene carbons; 6-31G was used for other atoms, whereas the
General Methods. All reactions were run under an argon atmo-
sphere, using oven-dried glassware and magnetic stirring. Molecular
sieves were activated at 250 °C and 0.5 µbar for 24 h and then stored
in a drybox. Methanol was heated at reflux over magnesium turnings
for several hours and then distilled and stored over activated 3 Å
molecular sieves under argon. Dichloromethane was distilled from
1
8
SDD ECP and basis set augmented with one set of f-polarization
(13) D ´ı az-Requejo, M. M.; P e´ rez, P. J.; Brookhart, M.; Tempelton, J. L.
Organometallics 1997, 16, 4399.
14) Linde, C.; Arnold, M.; Norrby, P.-O.; Åkermark, B. Angew Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1802-1803.
15) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
(
2
powdered CaH under nitrogen just prior to use. 1,2-Dihydronaphthalene
(
was filtered through neutral alumina and freshly distilled. Diimine 3
was prepared according to a literature procedure.11 Analytical GC was
carried out using a Varian OV-5 column (30 m, 0.32 mm i.d., 0.25 µm
film) and N as carrier gas. Neutral alumina (Merck, activity I) was
2
used for the filtration of GC samples.
Typical Procedure for the Kinetic Analyses. In a 5 mL pear-shaped
flask Cu(CH
mL) and stirred for 10 min under argon. The solution was filtered
through a plug of glass wool to a three-necked flask containing a
suspension of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene (130-260 mg, 1.0-2.0 mmol),
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann,
R. E., Jr.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin,
K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi,
R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.;
Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.;
Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J.
V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng,
C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-
Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.3;
Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
3
CN)
4
PF
6
2 2
(16 mg, 43 µmol) was dissolved in CH Cl (3.0
(
16) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652. (b) Lee,
(19) For a similar determination, see Ehlers, E. W.; B o¨ hme, M.; Dapprich,
S.; Gobbi, A.; H o¨ llwarth, A.; Jonas, V.; K o¨ hler, K. F.; Stegmann, R.;
Veldkamp, A.; Frenking, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 208, 111.
(20) Quan, R. W.; Li, Z.; Jacobsen, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
8156.
C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
(
17) Hay; P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299.
(18) Andrae, D.; H a¨ ussermann, U.; Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Theor.
Chim. Acta 1990, 77, 123.