3780 Ukoha et al.
Asian J. Chem.
dependence path of the reaction and substituting eqn. 3 into
eqn. 2 we have the rate law to be
This suggests the possibility of intermediates or precursor
complexes taking part in the reaction18. Above data strongly
suggest that this reaction very likely follows the inner-sphere
mechanism according to the proposed reaction scheme.
-d[IO4-]/dt = {a + b [H+]}[IO4-][RSH]
(6)
Eqn. 6 results from the following steps:
K1
7RSH + 7H+
HRSH+ + IO4-
7HRSH+
(7)
(8)
(9)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
K2
One of the authors, Pius O. Ukoha thank the Federal College
of Chemical and Leather Technology, Zaria for award of study
fellowship to carry out this work andAhmadu Bello University,
Zaria for providing some of the instruments.
[HRSH-IO4]
k3
[HRSH-IO4]
RS* + IO3* + H2O
6RS* + 3H2O* + I* + 6H+ (10)
k4
6HRSH+ + IO3*
k5
k6
IO4- + RSH
6RSH + IO3*
RS* + IO3* + OH-
6RS* + I* + 3H2O
(11)
REFERENCES
(12)
(13)
1. P. Piste, Int. Pharm. Chem. Biol. Sci., 3, 143 (2013).
2. A. Galano and J.R. Alvarez-Idaboy, RSC Adv., 1, 1763 (2011).
3. A.C. Chan, Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 71, 725 (1993).
4. V. Shetty, D.S. Spellman and T.A. Neubert, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.,
18, 1544 (2007).
5. B. Sharma, S. Singh and N.J. Siddiqi, BioMed Res. Int., Article ID
640754 (2014).
6. S. Mandal, G. Das and H. Askari, Struct. Chem., 25, 43 (2014).
7. M. Ranjbar, N. Shahsavan and M. Yousefi, Am. Chem. Sci. J., 2, 111
(2012).
8. F.J. Pereira, M.D. Vázquez, L. Debán and A.J. Aller, Polyhedron, 76,
71 (2014).
9. N.M. Giles, A.B. Watts, G.I. Giles, F.H. Fry, J.A. Littlechild and C.
Jacob, Chem. Biol., 10, 677 (2003).
10. S.J.S. Flora, Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev., 2, 191 (2009).
11. N.M. Giles, G.I. Giles and C. Jacob, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,
300, 1 (2003).
12. C. Jacob, G.I. Giles, N.M. Giles and H. Sies, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.,
42, 4742 (2003).
13. H.M.Abdel-Halim,A.S.Abu-Surrah and H.M. Baker, Jordan J. Chem.,
7, 33 (2012).
14. I. Warad, M. Al-Nuri, M. Abu Eid, Z. Al-Othman, S. Al-Resayes And
N. Diab, J. Chem., 7, S527 (2010).
15. H.M. Abdel-Halim, A.S. Abu-Surrah and H.M. Baker, Z. Anorg. Allg.
Chem., 636, 872 (2010).
16. G.A. Ayoko and M.A. Olatunji, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 80, L15 (1983).
17. G.A. Ayoko and M.A. Olatunji, Polyhedron, 2, 577 (1983).
18. J.F. Iyun, K.Y. Musa and G.A.Ayoko, Indian J. Chem., 35A, 210 (1996).
19. D.W.J. Kwong and D.E. Penington, Inorg. Chem., 23, 2528 (1984).
20. D.A. Dixon, T.P. Dasgupta and N.P. Sadler, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.,
2267 (1995).
21. J.M. Walshe, Chem. Scr., 20, 461 (1964).
22. J.P. Sugiura, Y. Hojo and H. Tanaka, Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo), 20,
1362 (1972).
23. H.M. Lawal and J.F. Iyun, Indian J. Chem., 37A, 155 (1998).
24. A. McAuley and U.D. Gomwalk, J. Chem. Soc. A, 977 (1969).
25. U.D. Gomwalk and A. McAuley, J. Chem. Soc. A, 2948 (1968).
26. R.N. Haszeldine, J. Chem. Soc., 584 (1951).
27. H.A. Benesi and J.H. Hildebrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 2703 (1949).
28. F.A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, C.A. Murillo and M. Bochmann, Advanced
Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Boston, edn 6 (1999).
29. F. Haurowitz, Chemistry & Functions of Protien, Academic Press, New
York, edn 2 (1963).
30. G.W. Castellan, Physical Chemistry,Addision-Wesley Pub. Co. Mass (1981).
31. R.G. Wilkin, Kinetics and Mechanism of Reactions of Transition Metal
Complexes, VCR Publishers, Inc., New York (2002).
32. L. Wang, I.N. Odeh and D.W. Margerum, Inorg. Chem., 43, 7545
(2004).
I* + I* → I2
OH- + H+ → H2O
I2 + I- → I3
14RS* → 7RSSR
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
-
Rate = k3[RSH2–IO4] + k5[RSH] [IO4-]
From eqn. 7:
[RSH2+] = K1[RSH][H+]
(18)
(19)
(20)
From eqn. 8:
[RSH2- IO4] = K2[HRSH+][IO4-]
Substituting eqn. 18 into eqn. 19 gives
[RSH2 – IO4] = K1K2[RSH][H+][IO4-]
Therefore
Rate = k3 K1K2[RSH][H+] + k5[RSH][IO4-]
(21)
(22)
= k3K1K2[H+] + k5[RSH][IO4-]
Eqn. 21 is similar to eqn. 3, where a = k5 and b = k3 K1K2
The presence of free radicals was indicated by the positive
polymerization test on addition of acrylamide to partially
oxidized mixture of the reactants in excess methanol. The
formation of the intermediate as suggested in eqn. 8 is thought
to be fast whereas its decomposition is the rate determining
step. The reaction between IO4 and VO2 showed similar
characteristics34. Michaelis-Menten plot of 1/kobs versus 1/(IO4-)
was linear with positive intercept on the 1/kobs axis (Fig. 4).
-
+
0.18
y = 1.2864x + 0.001
R2 = 0.9968
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
33. A.A. Abdel-khalek, Polyhedron, 8, 51 (1989).
34. D.J.B. Galliford and J.M. Ottaway, Analyst, 97, 412 (1972).
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
1/[IO4– ]
Fig. 4. Michaelis-Menten-type plot of 1/kobs versus 1/[IO4–] for the title reaction