Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
+
1
(
experiments for each purified compound 1−5 (10 μg/mL) were
repeated twice using wells containing at least 1000 DRG cells.
4.9. Constellation Pharmacology Comparison of 1 and 6
(Figures 5 and 6). Compounds 1 and 6 (10 μM) were tested in
different wells. This experiment was repeated twice for each
compound (34 day-old male mouse for 1 and 34 day-old male
mouse for 6) with at least 1000 DRG cells in each experiment.
2
7
45
4
Conosteroid C (3): colorless amorphous powder; IR ν 3407,
max
−
1
+
2
(
923, 2840, 1665 cm ; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 415.3204 [M + H] ,
+
1
13
27 43 3
Conosteroid D (4): colorless amorphous powder; IR ν 2950,
max
−
1
+
2
(
860, 1715, 1684 cm ; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 413.3065 [M + H] ,
4.10. Constellation Pharmacology to Test the GABA
A
+
1
13
Receptor Negative Allosteric Modulator Activity of Com-
pound 6 (Figure 8B). Neurons were depolarized every 5 min using
KCl (30 mM) for 10 s. The cells were incubated for 4 min with
GABA (340 μM), GABA (340 μM) + PS (pregnolone sulfate sodium
salt, 0.5 μM), GABA (340 μM) + 6 (0.5 μM), and GABA (340 μM)
at times 12, 32, and 42 min. After each incubation, another KCl pulse
was used to evaluate compound activity by comparing the cell
response to KCl pulse before compound incubation. This experiment
used a 40-day-old male mouse with 1600 DRG neurons.
27 41 3
Conosteroid E (5): colorless amorphous powder; IR ν 3491,
max
−
1
+
2
(
923, 2840, 1656 cm ; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 397.3106 [M + H] ,
+
1
13
27 41 2
4
.4. Synthesis of Compound 6. To a solution of 7-
ketocholesterol (250 mg) dissolved in MeOH (4 mL) was added
TFA (0.5 mL). The reaction solution was stirred at 50 °C for 2 h. The
reaction mixture was dried in vacuo and resuspended in MeOH.
Compound 6 was purified by HPLC using a C18 column with 100%
4
.11. Activity of Other Sterols in Constellation Pharmacol-
ogy (Figure 8C). Neurons were depolarized every 5 min using KCl
30 mM) for 10 s. The cells were incubated for 4 min with 10 μM
(
each cholesterol, ergosterol, cholic acid, and 6 at times 12, 22, 32, 42,
and 52 min. After each incubation, another KCl pulse was used to
evaluate compound activity by comparing the cell response to KCl
pulse before compound incubation. This experiment was done once
4
.5. ECD Calculation. Conformational searches were performed
by the Spartan 14 package using the MMFF molecular mechanics
force field. The geometries with a Boltzmann distribution >5% were
optimized with DFT calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level
using the Gaussian 09 program. The calculations of ECD spectra were
performed at the TDDFT level of theory using CAM-B3LYP/SVP.
Theoretical ECD spectra were obtained as the weighted averages of
Boltzmann populations using the program SpecDis.
.6. General Procedure for the DRG Assay. Lumbar DRGs
L1−L6 from CGRP-GFP (calcitonin gene related peptide and green
fluorescent protein) mice were used as described.
DRG neurons from CGRP-GFP mice were dissociated by treating
DRGs with 0.25% trypsin at 37 °C for 20 min followed by mechanical
trituration with decreasing diameters of fire-polished Pasteur pipettes.
Neurons were then plated into the center of a silicone ring that was
previously attached to the floor of a 24-well poly-D-lysine coated plate.
After allowing the cells to adhere to the floor of the plate for
approximately 1 h, medium (0.7 mL) was added to each well,
consisting of minimal essential medium (Invitrogen) supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1× penicillin/streptomycin, 10 mM
HEPES, and 0.4% (w/v) glucose, pH 7.4. The plated cells were placed
(
32-day-old male mouse) using 1200 DRG neurons.
4
.12. Evaluating 6 in the Presence of Gabazine (Figure 8D).
Neurons were depolarized every 5 min using KCl (30 mM) for 10 s.
We performed the DRG assay, as described above, except using
gabazine (3.4 μM), gabazine (34 μM), gabazine (340 μM), 6 (40
μM), gabazine (340 μM) + 6 (40 μM), and 6 (40 μM) for 4 min at
times 12, 22, 32, 42, 52, and 62 min, respectively. This experiment
was repeated twice (26 and 32 day-old male mice) with 2500 DRG
neurons.
4
26,27
Briefly, lumbar
4
.13. Formulation of 6. A panel of different formulations were
attempted, leading to the choice of medium-chain triglyceride (MCT)
oil as a diluent that completely dissolved 6, which was biocompatible
and was nontoxic in mouse tests. MCT oil (100% USP grade) was
purchased from MCT Lean.
4
.14. von Frey and Hot-Plate Tests. Animals were randomly
divided into a total of five groups with eight mice per group. All
groups were intraperitoneally injected 0.25 mL/mouse with vehicle
(
MCT oil), buprenorphine (2 mg/kg), or different doses of
compound 6 (2, 10, and 50 mg/kg) prepared in MCT oil 15 min
in a 5% CO incubator at 37 °C overnight. The cells were incubated
2
39
before the von Frey test. For the von Frey test, animals were
individually placed in Plexiglas chambers on a wire mesh grid
with Fura2-AM dye for 1 h at 37 °C and 0.5 h at room temperature.
Using a fluorescence microscope, the fluorescence ratio (340 nm/380
nm excitation; 510 nm emission) was used as an indicator of the
relative level of intracellular calcium in each cell while applying a set
of pharmacological agents over a 2 h time course at room
temperature. The cells were exposed to each agent for 200−400
ms, and images were recorded every 2 s for the duration of the
experiment. Pharmacological agents used to differentiate cell types
were present in each experiment and included allyl isothiocyanate
(Bioseb). A total of three sets of stimuli (10 applications each) were
applied to the plantar surface in the left hind paw, with at least a 5 s
interval between two consecutive applications and at least 5 min
between two consecutive sets of stimuli. The response was defined as
fast withdrawal, flinching, or licking/biting of the paw in response to
the filament contact. The total number of responses from the 30
stimuli applied was used to calculate the response percentage of each
38
animal. For the hot-plate test, after the von Frey test, the animal was
individually put on a metal plate surface, which was set at 52 °C, to
evaluate thermal pain hypersensitivity. The time was recorded when
the mouse exhibited nocifensive behaviors such as hind paw
withdrawal, licking, or jumping. Each mouse was tested three times
with 5 min interval between each test. The average time each mouse
stayed on the 52 °C plate was calculated. The compound effect (*p <
0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) was compared to the vehicle group
with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the GraphPad
Prism.
(
100 μM), menthol (400 μM), capsaicin (300 nM), ATP (20 μM),
KCl (20, 30, and 40 mM), and conotoxin κM-RIIIJ (1 μM).
Following the calcium imaging experiments, the cells were incubated
with Alexa-Fluor 568 isolectin B4 (2.5 μg/mL) for 5 min at room
temperature. The cells were then washed 4 times, incubated for 4 or 5
min, and washed three more times. Images were acquired using a
rhodamine filter set, and trace data were analyzed with an in-house
software built in the R language.
4
.7. Cell-Type Definition by Constellation Pharmacology.
Peptidergic nociceptors were fluorescent cells expressing CGRP-GFP,
while nonpeptidergic nociceptors were stained with the isolectin B4
antibody. C-LTMRs were small-diameter neurons that were not
CGRP-GFP or isolectin B4 positive and that did not respond to
capsaicin.
4.15. Formalin-Induced Pain Assay. The assay was performed
by Charles River Laboratories. Briefly, a total of 42 animals (C57BL/
6, 6−8 weeks) were randomly divided into five groups with eight mice
per group based on the body weight. Each group was treated 5 mL/kg
with vehicle (MCT oil), duloxetine (10 mg/kg), or different doses of
compound 6 (2, 10, and 50 mg/kg) in MCT oil 10 min before the
intraplantar subcutaneous injection of 30 μL of 5% formalin into the
left hind paw. For all groups, animals were acclimated to the
4
.8. Constellation Pharmacology-Guided Isolation of 1−5
(
Figure 1). The C. geographus HB gland extract (100 μg/mL) and
compounds 1−5 (10 μg/mL) were tested in a series of DRG cell
cultures over a period of months (mice from 25 to 35 days old). The
7
040
J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 7033−7043