F. A. Khan, B. Rout / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 5251–5253
5253
Table 1. NaBH
4
reduction of 11
MeO
OMe
MeO
OMe
CO Me
2
O
H
NaBH4
OH
5
O
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
11
12
Entry
Solvent
Temp
Time
Equiv of NaBH
4
Isolated yield (%±
1
2
3
4
5
THF
THF
MeOH
Diglyme
Dioxane
rt
7 d
1 h
3 h
4 h
1 h
2.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
85
Reflux
Reflux
90 °C
85 °C
Intractable mixture
56
72
95
MeO
O
OMe
Chemicals, Inc., Tokyo, Japan, for a generous gift of
vinylene carbonate.
MeO
O
OMe
OH
1
) 90% TFA, rt, 6 h
OAc
o
H
O
O
2) Ac O, py, 0 C-rt
2
Referenꢁes and notes
H
OAc
OAc
O
14 h, 66%
O
1
2
13
1
. (a± Umino, K.; Furumai, T.; Matsuzawa, N.; Awataguchi,
Y.; Ito, Y.; Okuda, T. J. Antibiot. 1973, 26, 506–512; (b±
Umino, K.; Takeda, N.; Ito, Y.; Okuda, T. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1974, 22, 1233–1238.
o
1
2
) 90% TFA, 70 C, 36 h
o
) Ac O, py, 0 C-rt, 14 h
2
O
MeO
OMe
2. Gibson, S. E.; Lewis, S. E.; Mainolfi, N. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2004, 689, 3873–3890.
OH
3
. (a± Smith, A. B., III; Branca, S. J.; Pilla, N. N.; Guaciaro,
M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1855–1869, and references
therein; (b± Verlaak, J. M. J.; Klunder, A. J. H.;
Zwanenburg, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 5463–5466;
O
OAc
+
13
+
OAc
O
H
OAc
OAc
OAc
±)-14 38%
(
11%
15 5%
(
c± Elliott, J. D.; Hetmanski, M.; Palfreyman, M. N.;
Purcell, N.; Stoodley, R. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 965–
68; (d± Hetmanski, M.; Purcell, N.; Stoodley, R. J.;
Palfreyman, M. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984,
089–2096; (e± Pohmakotr, M.; Popuang, S. Tetrahedron
Sꢁheꢀe 4.
9
2
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a concise stereose)
lective route to (± ±)pentenomycin in 49% overall yield
starting from 5, which in turn was obtained from the
readily accessible Diels–Alder adduct 4 in 68% overall
yield. An interesting observation during the PCC oxida)
tion of b)hydroxy)dimethylketal 6 leading to b)meth)
oxy)a,b)unsaturated aldehyde 8 was reported. A highly
efficient chemoselective reduction of the ester moiety in
lactone 11, followed by a one)pot transformation of
the resulting alcohol 12 to (± ±)pentenomycin triacetate
Lett. 1991, 32, 275–278.
4
. (a± Verheyden, J. P. H.; Richardson, A. C.; Bhatt, R. S.;
Grant, B. D.; Fitch, W. L.; Moffatt, J. G. Pure Appl. Chem.
1
978, 50, 1363–1383; (b± Achab, S.; Cosson, J. P.; Das, B.
C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 1040–1041; (c±
Seepersaud, M.; Al)Abed, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
4
291–4293; (d± Gallos, J. K.; Damianou, K. C.; Dellios, C.
C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5769–5771; (e± Venkata
Ramana, G.; Venkateswara Rao, B. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 5103–5105.
5
6
. (a± Sugahara, T.; Ogasawara, K. Synlett 1999, 419–420; (b±
Rivero, M. R.; De la Rosa, J. C.; Carretero, J. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14992–14993.
1
4, was also reported.
. Khan, F. A.; Dash, J.; Rout, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
Aꢁknowledgeꢀents
9
285–9288.
7
8
9
. Khan, F. A.; Dash, J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4556–4559.
. Ohno, K.; Tsuji, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 99–107.
Financial support from the Department of Science and
Technology (DST±, New Delhi, is gratefully acknowl)
edged. F.A.K. acknowledges the DST for a Swarnajay)
anti Fellowship. We thank Mr. T. Ogino of Mitsui Fine
1
13
. The spectral data ( H and C± of both (± ±)pentenomycin 1
and (± ±)pentenomycin triacetate 14 were in agreement with
1
the reported values.