1978
L. De Napoli et al.
LETTER
MCPBA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1 h; f: Et3N·3HF, THF, r.t., 18 h; g:
1% DCA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 10 min; h: 17 M NH4OH, 60 °C, 18 h.
(10) Silva, D. J.; Wang, H.; Allanson, N. M.; Jain, R. K.; Sofia,
M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5926.
(11) In the synthesis of short oligomers 17–20, better crudes were
obtained if the oxidation of the support was carried out
before the coupling with the phosphoramidite building
block.
In conclusion, we have described the synthesis of new nu-
cleoside-based solid supports (4, 5 and 8, 9) in which the
nucleosides are anchored onto the solid support through
the base, so that all the ribosidic functions are susceptible
to selective manipulation to introduce the required diver-
sity into the carbohydrate subunit. Particularly, support 5
can be a useful entry to high diversity nucleic acid-based
libraries (NAB). In fact, not only does this support contain
an intact nucleoside skeleton, but also the simultaneous
presence of a masked amino function (i.e. the 2¢-azido
group) and orthogonally removable protecting groups
(DMT and TBDMS), respectively at the 5¢ and 3¢-OH of
the ribose moiety, allows a versatile tridirectional elonga-
tion and/or derivatization of the hybrid biomolecules.
Starting from support 5, incorporating a 2¢-amino-2¢-
deoxyuridine scaffold, we devised a facile synthetic strat-
egy to obtain different nucleoside or short oligonucleotide
hybrids of uridine (as 13–20), following simple and well-
established peptide and oligonucleotide chemistry. Fur-
ther studies are currently in progress to extend the Mit-
sunobu reaction to anchor other nucleosides on high
loading polystyrene based resin, allowing higher amounts
of the desired products in the series of ribose-modified nu-
cleoside analogues.
(12) Reagents and conditions for route B: a: 0.35 M Bu3P, THF–
H2O–EtOH (4.5:1.4:6), r.t., 5 h; b: Ac2O–pyridine (1:1, v/v),
r.t., 30 min; c: 0.5 M MCPBA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1 h; d:
Et3N·3HF, THF, r.t., 18 h; e: coupling with DMT-
phosphoramidite (5¢-DMT-dC-3¢-phosphoramidite for 17;
5¢-DMT-T-3¢-phosphoramidite for 18); f: 1% DCA, CH2Cl2,
r.t., 10 min; g: 17 M NH4OH, 60 °C, 18 h.
(13) Reagents and conditions for route C: a: 0.35 M Bu3P, THF–
H2O–EtOH (4.5:1.4:6), r.t., 5 h; b: HATU, HOBt, DIPEA,
Fmoc-a.a.-OH, DMF, r.t., 1 h.; c: 1% DCA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 10
min; d: Ac2O–pyridine (1:1, v/v), r.t., 30 min; e: 0.5 M
MCPBA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1 h; f: Et3N·3HF, THF, r.t., 18 h; g:
coupling with 3¢-DMT-T-5¢-phosphoramidite; h: 1% DCA,
CH2Cl2, r.t., 10 min; i: 20% piperidine/DMF, r.t., 5 min; l:
17 M NH4OH, 60 °C, 18 h.
(14) Reagents and conditions for route D: a: 0.35 M Bu3P, THF–
H2O–EtOH (4.5:1.4:6), r.t., 5 h; b: HATU, HOBt, DIPEA,
Fmoc-a.a.-OH, DMF, r.t., 1 h.; c: Ac2O–pyridine (1:1, v/v),
r.t., 30 min; d: 0.5 M MCPBA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1 h; e 1% DCA,
CH2Cl2, r.t., 10 min; f: coupling with 5¢-DMT-dA-3¢-
phosphoramidite; g: 1% DCA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 10 min; h:
Ac2O–pyridine (1:1, v/v), r.t., 30 min; i: Et3N·3HF, THF, r.t.,
18 h; l: coupling with 3¢-DMT-T-5¢-phosphoramidite; m:
1% DCA, CH2Cl2, r.t., 10 min; n: 20% piperidine–DMF, r.t.,
5 min; o: 17 M NH4OH, 60 °C, 18 h.
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge MIUR, CNR and Regione Campania for grants in
support of this investigation. We also thank C.I.M.C.F., Università
degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’, for the NMR and MS facilities.
(15) Selected data for compound 13: 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O):
d = 7.78 (1 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6), 6.06 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz,
H-1¢), 5.89 (1 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 4.60 (1 H, m, H-2¢),
4.33–4.22 (2 H, overlapped signals, H-3¢ and CH a Leu),
4.20 (1 H, m, H-4¢), 3.85 (2 H, m, H2-5¢), 2.00 (3 H, s, acetyl
protons), 1.60–1.57 (3 H, overlapped signals, CH and CH2
Leu), 0.90 and 0.86 (3 H each, 2 d, CH3 Leu). Compound 14:
1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): d = 7.86 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-
6), 7.42–7.26 (5 H, complex signals, aromatic protons), 6.01
(1 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1¢), 5.93 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5); H-
2¢ signal is buried under the residual HDO signal; 4.21 (1 H,
dd, J = 2.5 and 2.0 Hz, CH a of Phe), 4.16 (1 H, m, H-4¢),
3.93–3.84 (2 H, m, H2-5¢), 3.81 (1 H, m, H-3¢), 3.73 (2 H, m,
CH2 of Phe), 1.97 (3 H, s, acetyl protons). Compound 15: 1H
NMR (500 MHz, D2O): d = 7.75 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-6),
6.07 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-1¢), 5.89 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-
5), 4.72–4.64 (1 H, m, H-2¢), 4.34 (1 H, dd, J = 5.5 and 2.5
Hz, H-3¢), 4.20 (1 H, m, H-4¢), 4.12 (1 H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, CH
a Val), 3.85 (2 H, m, H2-5¢), 2.18–2.12 [1 H, m, CH(CH3)2],
1.83 (3 H, s, acetyl protons), 0.92 and 0.89 [3 H each, 2 d,
J = 7.0 Hz, CH(CH3)2]. Compound 16: 1H NMR (500 MHz,
D2O): d = 7.85 (1 H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6), 6.05 (1 H, d, J = 8.5
Hz, H-1¢), 5.92 (1 H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5), 4.65 (1 H, m, H-2¢),
4.35 (1 H, m, H-3¢), 4.30 (1 H, m, CH a Lys), 4.25 (1 H, m,
H-4¢), 3.85 (2 H, m, H2-5¢), 3.25 (2 H, t, CH2 e Lys), 2.08 and
2.04 (3 H each, 2 s, acetyl protons), 1.75 (2 H, m, CH2 b
Lys), 1.55 (2 H, m, CH2 d Lys), 1.35 (2 H, m, CH2 g Lys).
Compound 17: 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O), significant
signals: d = 7.86 (1 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6 U), 7.78 (1 H, d,
J = 7.5 Hz, H-6 C), 6.31 (1 H, dd, J = 6.5 and 7.0 Hz, H-1¢ C),
6.14 (1 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5 C), 6.07 (1 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz,
H-5 U), 5.88 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-1¢ U), 3.89–3.76 (4 H,
overlapped signals, H2-5¢ U and C), 2.62–2.30 (2 H, m, H-2¢
C), 2.15 (1 H, m, H-2¢ U), 1.93 (3 H, s, acetyl protons).
References
(1) (a) Booth, S.; Hermkens, P. H. H.; Ottenheijm, H. C. J.;
Rees, D. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 15385. (b) Kobayashi, S.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 1.
(2) Balkenhohl, F.; von dem Bussche-Huennefeld, C.; Lansky,
A.; Zechel, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2288.
(3) Tempest, P. A.; Armstrong, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 7607.
(4) (a) Knapp, S. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1859. (b) Huryn, D. M.;
Okabe, M. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1745.
(5) (a) Zhou, W.; Roland, A.; Jin, Y.; Iyer, R. P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 441. (b) Jin, Y.; Roland, A.; Zhou, W.;
Fauchon, M.; Lyaku, J.; Iyer, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2000, 10, 1921. (c) Jin, Y.; Chen, X.; Côte, M. E.; Roland,
A.; Korba, B.; Mounir, S.; Iyer, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2001, 11, 2057.
(6) Epple, R.; Kudirka, R.; Greenberg, W. A. J. Comb. Chem.
2003, 5, 292.
(7) de Champdore’, M.; De Napoli, L.; Di Fabio, G.; Messere,
A.; Montesarchio, D.; Piccialli, G. Chem. Commun. 2001,
24, 2598.
(8) Sharma et al. (Sharma, R. A.; Bobek, M.; Bloch, A. J. Med.
Chem. 1975, 18, 955–957) can be acknowledged for the
pioneering synthesis of some aminoacyl and peptidyl
derivatives of 2¢-amino-2¢-deoxyuridine but, to the best of
our knowledge, these nucleoside hybrids have not been
further investigated in their biological potential.
(9) Reagents and conditions for route A: a: 0.35 M Bu3P, THF–
H2O–EtOH (4.5:1.4:6), r.t., 5 h; b: HATU, HOBt, DIPEA,
Fmoc-a.a.-OH, DMF, r.t., 1 h.; c: 20% piperidine–DMF, r.t.,
5 min; d: Ac2O–pyridine (1:1, v/v), r.t., 30 min; e: 0.5 M
Synlett 2004, No. 11, 1975–1979 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York