S. Khopkar et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 285 (2019) 123–135
129
red shifted to 29 nm, 56 nm and 30 nm respectively as compared to
Table 3
Charge transfer characteristics of SSK 1–3 by Mulliken-Hush analysis.
their emission maxima (λem) in methanol. This bathochromic emission
in solid state can be attributed to the intermolecular pi-pi interactions of
SSK 1–3 in solid state [43].
−8
fb
c
2d
HDAe
RDAf
Compound Solvent
aa × 10
μeg
C
−
1
(cm
)
SSK 1
SSK 2
SSK 3
Toluene
THF
Dioxane
Chloroform
DMF
4.201
4.194
4.200
4.191
4.191
4.197
4.191
4.192
4.200
4.194
4.200
4.191
4.191
4.197
4.191
4.191
4.201
4.196
4.202
4.192
4.192
4.198
4.193
4.192
1.38 11.35 0.428 11,206 18.82
1.39 11.39 0.428 11,273 18.44
1.22 10.67 0.424 11,204 18.92
1.79 12.97 0.437 11,338 16.73
1.59 12.18 0.433 11,308 17.73
1.94 13.53 0.440 11,338 16.56
1.52 11.96 0.432 11,298 17.94
1.58 12.11 0.433 11,298 17.85
1.42 11.52 0.416 11,206 20.15
1.46 11.66 0.418 11,211 20.14
1.30 11.04 0.413 11,140 20.27
1.77 12.91 0.425 11,287 17.71
1.71 12.61 0.423 11,285 17.78
2.79 16.24 0.440 11,307 17.41
1.48 11.73 0.418 11,241 18.78
1.53 11.96 0.420 11,254 18.55
1.27 11.07 0.409 11,129 18.78
1.30 11.24 0.410 11,153 18.73
1.08 10.12 0.402 11,042 20.32
1.57 12.10 0.418 11,241 17.91
1.56 12.07 0.417 11,236 18.05
2.20 14.42 0.431 11,258 16.77
1.35 11.41 0.412 11,175 18.46
1.40 11.43 0.413 11,234 18.25
3
.4. Solvatochromism
The emission spectra of SSK 1–3 showed positive solvatochromic
properties i.e. emission wavelength increases with increase in solvent
polarity (Fig. 2). This positive solvatochromic behaviour was quantita-
tively determined using different solvent polarity plots viz. Lippert-
Mattaga plot, MacRae plot and ET (30) solvent polarity parameter.
Lippert-Mattaga plot provides the correlation of physical parameters
DMSO
Acetonitrile
Methanol
Toluene
THF
Dioxane
Chloroform
DMF
(
dielectric constant and refractive index) of solvent with Stokes shift of
compound [44]. It is plot of Stokes shift in wave number versus orienta-
tion polarizability (ΔfLM). It does not account for the specific solute-
solvent interactions such as hydrogen bonding and molecular com-
plexes. Fig. 4A represents the graph of Stokes shift of SSK 1–3 versus ori-
entation polarizability. A good linear correlation with good regression
DMSO
Acetonitrile
Methanol
Toluene
THF
Dioxane
Chloroform
DMF
DMSO
Acetonitrile
Methanol
2
coefficient (R = 0.60 for SSK 1, 0.68 for SSK 2 and 0.68 for SSK 3) ob-
served in Fig. 4A suggesting that physical parameters of solvents are col-
lectively responsible for positive emission solvatochromic shift in polar
solvents.
McRae solvent polarity plot considers solute polarizability along
with the solvent polarizability [45]. Fig. 4B shows a graph of Stokes
a
Onsager radii calculated from DFT.
Oscillator strength.
Transition dipole moment.
The degree of delocalization or fractional degree of localization of the excess charge.
Electronic coupling matrix.
Donor-acceptor coupling matrix distance.
−
1
b
c
d
e
f
shift of SSK 1–3 in cm
versus McRae function, ΔfMR. The linear
relationship observed in Fig. 4B suggests that the dipole created be-
tween benzo-indolenine and squaryl ring of these dyes also contributed
to the emission solvatochromic shift. ET (30), empirical solvent
polarity parameter introduced by Dimroth-Reichardt correlates the
solvatochromic stokes shift of compound with ET (30) solvent polarity
parameter [46]. The relationship between stokes shift and ET (30) can
be explained by parameter which represents acidity, dipolarity or polar-
excited state dipole moment (μ
e g e
− μ ) and dipole moment ratio μ /
izability but not the basicity of solvent. The good regression coefficients
μ of SSK 1–3. The Onsager radii of SSK 1–3 were calculated from
DFT optimized geometries considering the charge transferred from
benzo-indolenine nitrogen to squaryl oxygen. The ground state di-
g
2
(
R = 0.78–0.86) and good linearity observed in Fig. 4C indicates that
dielectric solute-solvent interaction also contributed for the positive
emission solvatochromic shift.
pole moments (μ
optimized ground state geometries in different polar and non-polar
solvents. From the ground state dipole moments (μ ) and slope of
g
) of these compounds were calculated from DFT
3
.5. Intramolecular charge transfer and dipole moment
g
Lippert-Mattaga plot (m), the excited state dipole moments (μ
e
)
Positive solvatochromism is a strong evidence of stabilization of ex-
were calculated.
cited state and increased intramolecular charge transfer characteristics
of SSK 1–3 from non-polar to polar solvents. The intramolecular charge
transfer of SSK 1–3 occurs from benzo-indolenine donor to squaryl ac-
ceptor. To correlate the positive solvatochromism with intramolecular
charge transfer (ICT) and twisted intramolecular charge transfer
The positive difference in dipole moment of S
suggests that excited state is more stabilized in polar solvents and con-
firms the increased intramolecular charge transfer of excited state in
0
and S
1
state (S
1
˃ S
0
)
(
TICT), we studied the Wellers and Rettig solvent polarity plots. Weller's
plot is a plot of emission wave number of compound versus Weller's
function, Δf [47]. This plot gives the evidence of intramolecular charge
transfer within D-π-A type dyes. Fig. 5A shows the graph of emission
wave number of SSK 1–3 in cm versus Weller's function. The good
linearity with good regression coefficients in Wellers plot demonstrates
that effective intramolecular charge transfer phenomenon responsible
for positive emission solvatochromism. Rettig plot gives the evidence
of twisted intramolecular charge transfer in the molecules [48]. The lin-
ear relationship in Rettig plot (Fig. 4B) indicates that there is TICT in ad-
dition with ICT within SSK 1–3.
0
0
0
0
.000025
.000020
.000015
.000010
w
SSK1
SSK2
SSK3
−
1
0.000005
0.000000
0.000005
Although regression coefficients of Wellers and Rettig plots were
close to unity, it does not give the order of charge transfer character-
istics. The order of charge transfer characteristics can be determined
using difference in dipole moment of ground state (μ
g
) and excited
-
state (μ ). The ground state and excited state dipole moments give
e
0.0
0.2
0.4
Potential / V
0.6
0.8
1.0
an idea about dipolar and polarizability character of molecule in
the ground state and excited state. Table 2 shows the oscillator
strength (f), transition dipole moment (μeg), Onsager radius (a),
slope of Lippert-Mattaga plot (m), difference in ground state and
4 4
Fig. 6. Cyclic voltammograms of SSK 1–3 (1 mM) in chloroform containing n-Bu NClO
(0.1 M).