3
14
Journal of the American Ceramic Society—Rezaie et al.
Vol. 89, No. 1
reaction. Unlike using MgO refractories that would be suscep-
tible to hydration, MgAl is stable against hydration and
appeared to follow the grain boundaries suggesting them as the
primary route of attack in this material.
2 4
O
would react with the smelt to form the protective MgO layer. If
the MgO layer was damaged in service or by hydration during
shut down, the underlying MgAl O would react with the smelt
2 3 2
Although Na CO did not react with CeO , some penetration
of the smelt through the pores was detected. This penetration is
attributed to flow of the smelt through the small volume fraction
of open pores, not reaction. Archimedes density measurements
2
4
and repair itself in situ.
By comparing the results of thermodynamics (Table III) with
the results of XRD from sessile drop testing (Table V), it was
found that the thermodynamics and experiment were not in
2
found B2 vol% open porosity in the CeO substrate. Neither
thermodynamic analysis nor XRD indicate that CeO should
react with Na CO . Thus, CeO should be considered among
2
2
3
2
agreement for ZrO , Y
2
2
O
3
, LiAlO , and BaAl
2
2
O
4
. For a-Al
2
O
3
,
the candidates for black liquor contact applications, if the price
and availability issues are overcome.
Based on thermodynamic analysis and sessile drop studies,
dense MgO is resistant to penetration and is a candidate for
applications requiring contact with molten black liquor smelt.
Although the smelt was found to react with MgAl O , a dense
2 4
MgO layer was formed in-situ (Fig. 6), preventing further attack.
The layer was approximately 3–4 mm thick and it appeared to
thermodynamics predicted the formation of Na
Al12O
2 19
00
(
b -alumina). However the amount of this phase compared with
the amount of NaAlO was very small (Na 19/NaAlO
2
2
Al12
O
2
ꢁ
5
ꢀ
1.4 ꢃ 10 ) to the extent that is not detectable by grazing
incidence XRD technique. For mullite, thermodynamics pre-
dicted the instability of the candidate in contact with the smelt;
but the reaction products predicted by thermodynamics were
not completely in agreement with the results of XRD analysis.
In contrast to the prediction by thermodynamics, a-Al O was
protect the underlying MgAl
Based on these results, further testing with MgO or MgAl O
4
2 4
O substrate from further attack.
2
3
2
not identified by X-ray but NaAlSiO , which was also predicted
as monolithic materials or as coatings on other substrates is
warranted.
4
by thermodynamics, was identified. Some unidentified peaks
were present in the pattern, which could belong to complex
compounds in Na–Al–Si–O system. These XRD peaks could be
caused by non-equilibrium phases that may disappear if longer
reaction times were employed. The other reason for the discrep-
ancy could be the lack of thermodynamic data in the database
for one of the compounds, as discussed above. For MgAl O ,
V. Summary and Conclusions
The results of thermodynamics and experiment for the reaction
of black liquor smelt with various ceramics were in agreement
for some candidate materials but not for others. Reactions were
2
4
the correct reaction was predicted by thermodynamics, but the
reaction was impeded by the formation of a diffusion barrier
2 3 2 2 4
correctly predicted for Al O , CeO , MgO, MgAl O , but not
for 3Al O ꢂ 2SiO ZrO , Y O , LiAlO , BaAl O . Failure of the
2
3
2,
2
2
3
2
2
4
(
MgO) that inhibited further reaction.
thermodynamic predictions was attributed to lack of data for
the reaction products produced by reaction of molten black liq-
uor smelt with candidate materials. Sessile drop experiments
were used to verify thermodynamic predictions and to determine
(3) Penetration
contact angles of the molten Na
materials. MgAl showed the highest contact angle with
Na CO (13.3171.21) while the highest contact angle for
K CO (9.9171.51) was obtained with MgO. Although CeO
2 3 2 3
CO and K CO on candidate
The penetration of Na compounds into candidate refractories
was investigated using X-ray mapping of polished cross-sections
of sessile drop specimens. As expected, based on thermodynam-
ics and the large volume change associated with the reaction, Na
penetrated into mullite forming a distinct reaction layer at the
surface of the substrate (Fig. 4). Mapping showed that the re-
action layer was about 50 mm thick after sessile drop test. In this
geometry, it is likely that the depth of penetration was limited by
2 4
O
2
3
2
3
2
and MgO were wet by Na
CO
2 3
2 3
and K CO , they did not react
with either. Consequently, either CeO or MgO could be used
for refractories for applications requiring contact with black
liquor smelt. The best choice for this application may be
2
MgAl
CO
ther attack. Based on these considerations, MgO and MgAl O
2
O
4
. Although MgAl
2 4 2 3
O reacts with both Na CO and
2 3
the quantity of the reactant (Na CO ) during the reaction as all
K
2
3
, a dense layer of MgO forms quickly and prevents fur-
of the smelt was consumed. For alumina, the thickness of the
reaction layer was about 100 mm. Based on the volume change
associated with the reaction, deeper Na penetration would be
expected for alumina than mullite.
2
4
are suggested for further investigation in the form of rotary fin-
ger corrosion tests, sessile drop studies with actual black liquor
smelt, or trials in test gasifiers.
The reaction layer for the ZrO substrate was thin compared
2
with alumina and mullite, B5 mm. Analysis by GXRD verified
2
7
2 3
the formation of Na ZrO as predicted by Yamaguchi. Based
References
on the reported densities, a volume expansion of 46% is pre-
dicted for conversion of ZrO to Na ZrO , comparable with the
1
H. F. J. Wenzl, Kraft Pulping: Theory and Practice. Lockwood Publishing
Company, New York, 1967.
M. Agneta, Kraft Pulping: A Compilation of Notes. Tappi Press, Atlanta, GA,
1989.
2
2
3
2
expansions predicted for the reactions of alumina and mullite.
Although ZrO reacted with Na CO and formed an expansive
2
2
3
3
phase, the rate of penetration was slow compared with alumina
and mullite. The reaction layer for Y O was also relatively thin,
4
C. R. Hubbard, R. A. Peascoe, and J. R. Keiser, ‘‘Pulp and Paper Plant
2
3
Materials Issues Addressed by X-Ray and Neutron Diffraction Methods,’’ Adv.
X-Ray Anal, 46, 278–84 (2003).
J. R. Keiser, R. A. Peascoe, C. R. Hubbard, and J. P. Gorog, ‘‘Corrosion
Issues in Black Liquor Gasifiers’’; in Corrosion/2003 Conference Proceedings,
National Association of Corrosion Engineering, San Diego, CA, March 16–20,
B5–10 mm. Analysis by GXRD confirmed the formation of
NaYO , which should result in a volume expansion of B15%.
Based on sessile drop tests, ZrO and Y O could be candidates
2
5
2
2
3
for black liquor smelt contact applications because of signifi-
cantly slower penetration rates compared with alumina and alu-
minosilicates. However, neither showed the chemical resistance
demonstrated by MgO or MgAl O .
2
003.
6
J. Diebold, ‘‘Research into the Pyrolysis of Pure Cellulose, Lignin, and Birch
Wood Flour in the China Lake Entrained-Flow Reactor’’; Report number Seri/
TR-332-586, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO, 1980.
P. McKendry, ‘‘Energy Production from Biomass (Part 2): Conversion Tech-
nologies,’’ Bioresour. Technol., 83 [1] 47–54 (2002).
S. Consonni, E. D. Larson, and N. Berglin, ‘‘Black Liquor-Gasification/Gas
2
4
7
Among the aluminates, both the LiAlO
2
and BaAl O
2 4
subst-
rates contained open porosity. Thus, separation of the effects of
penetration because of flow through pores from penetration be-
cause of formation of a reaction layer was difficult. As reported
8
Turbine Cogeneration,’’ J. Eng. Gas. Turb. Power, 120 [3] 442–9 (1998).
L. L. Stigsson and B. Hesseborn, ‘‘Gasification of Black Liquor’’; pp. 277–95 in
9
in the previous section, Na CO
2
3
reacted readily with both of
International Chemical Recovery Conference Proceedings, Vol. B, Toronto, ON,
April 24–25, 1995, Technical Section CPPA, Montreal, QC, 1995.
C. L. Verrill, J. B. Kitto, and J. A. Dickinson, ‘‘Development and Evaluation
of a Low-Temperature Gasification Process for Chemical Recovery from Kraft
Black Liquor’’; pp. 1067–78 in International Chemical Recovery Conference
Proceedings, Tampa, FL, June 1–4, 1998 TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA, 1998.
these aluminates and significant penetration (on the order of the
penetration observed for alumina and mullite) would be expect-
ed. As discussed previously, widespread cracking was observed
10
2 2 3
upon reaction of LiAlO with Na CO (Fig. 5). The cracking