Z.-Y. Li et al.
Dyes and Pigments 188 (2021) 109180
Fig. 1. (a) Probe NBIS (5
μ
M) responded toward HSOꢀ3 /SO32ꢀ (0–2.0 equiv.). (b) The linear relationship between the ratio values of fluorescence intensity (I534/I610).
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). λex = 440 nm, slit: 7.5/7.5 nm, speed: 1200 nm/min.
purchased from commercial provider. Twice-distilled water was used
throughout all experiments.
2.4. Calculation of energy transfer efficiency (ETE)
ETE was calculated by following equation:
2.2. Synthesis of probe NBIS
ηETE = 1-FDA/FD
As shown in Scheme 2, the mixture of compound 3 (523 mg, 1.0
mmol), compound 5 (387 mg, 1.0 mmol), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (15
mg, 0.12 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide
hydrochloride (191 mg, 1.0 mmol) in dichloromethane (140 mL) was
stirred at room temperature for 18 h. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and then the residue was purified by column chro-
matography on silica gel to obtain probe NBIS (408 mg, dark violet
solid) in 46% yield, which was characterized by NMR, HRMS and IR
(Figs. S1–4). m. p. = 224–226 ◦C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.66 (d, J
= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.59–8.57 (m, 1H), 8.45–8.41 (m, 1H), 8.26–8.17 (m,
4H), 8.08–8.01 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.68 (m, 2H), 7.63–7.54 (m, 5H),
7.42–7.39 (m, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 2H), 6.86–6.83 (m, 1H), 4.42 (d,
J = 4.5 Hz, 3H), 3.82–3.73 (m, 8H), 3.56–3.48 (m, 4H), 2.13 (m, 4H),
2.07 (s, 6H). 13CNMR (75 MHz, DMSO‑d6) δ 181.72, 169.30, 164.45,
163.42, 154.35, 153.08, 152.94, 140.03, 138.17, 137.18, 135.60,
133.98, 133.47, 133.17, 131.59, 131.22, 131.10, 130.46, 129.92,
128.69, 128.06, 127.28, 126.97, 124.39, 123.71, 123.31, 122.37,
114.16, 113.33, 109.42, 108.99, 107.10, 56.49, 55.37, 53.40, 53.37,
46.62, 34.50, 26.26, 26.04, 19.01. IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3443, 2925, 2858,
1637, 1577, 1523, 1458, 1398, 1361, 1299, 1238, 1183, 1124, 1087.
HRMS (ESI): m/z found 764.3530, calculated for [C50H46O3N5]+:
764.3595.
Where, FDA and FD denote the maximum of fluorescence intensity with
and without an acceptor, respectively.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Design of fluorescent probe NBIS
The energy transfer efficiency of FRET probes is highly dependent on
the substantial overlap of the donor emission spectrum with the acceptor
absorption spectrum. In addition, two well-separated emission bands
with comparable intensities can ensure detection accuracy. However,
because the larger the spectral overlap, the shorter the emission shifts of
FRET systems, to reconcile the two parameters is difficult. Therefore, it
is still a current challenge to construct new FRET pairs.
Naphthalimide derivatives are classical fluorophores and widely
used to construct fluorescent probes including single emission or ratio-
metric signal. Due to the maximum emission of naphthalimide fluo-
rophore is around 560 nm, it can be used as both donor and acceptor in
the different FRET pairs, depending on the spectra of a second compo-
nent [20,28,29,32]. Hemicyanine dyes are widely used in fluorescent
probes based on ICT mechanism, because of its good solubility in water,
high molar extinction coefficients and lower cell toxicity. As a part of
ICT system, benzoindole moiety, generally in the cation form, due to the
excellent electron-withdrawing ability, is often used [27,42–44]. Ac-
cording to the spectral property of hemicyanine dyes, they should be
suitable as the acceptor for the construction of FRET platform. However,
benzoindole-based hemicyanine dyes for FRET platform are still rare
[45]. Therefore, in present work, a new FRET platform is constructed
(named as NBIS), in which naphthalimide derivatives is selected as the
donor and benzoindole-based hemicyanine is selected as the acceptor
(Scheme 1). When probe NBIS in a buffer solution (DMSO/PBS = 3:7,
pH = 7.4) was excited at 440 nm, the maximum emission centered 610
nm from acceptor moiety was observed because FRET process occurred.
However, after the probe reacted with HSOꢀ3 /SO32ꢀ , by a nucleophilic
2.3. Preparation of testing solution and cells culturing
A stock solution of probe NBIS (1 mM) was prepared in DMSO. The
stock solutions of other analytes were prepared by using distilled water.
50 μL stock solution of probe NBIS was transferred into volumetric flask
and diluted to 10 mL by the buffer solution (DMSO:PBS = 3:7, v/v, pH =
7.4) at room temperature. Then, various equivalents of HSOꢀ3 /SO32ꢀ or
other analytes was added.
Henrietta Lacks cells (HeLa cells), human liver cancer cells (HepG2
cells), human normal liver cells (L-O2 cells) were cultured with DMEM
(Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium) which contains supplement of
10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum). Human Dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were
cultured in DMEM Basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) bovine
calf serum. All cell lines were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 ◦C
under 5% CO2 atmosphere. Images were acquired using a confocal mi-
croscope (Zeiss LSM900).
–
addition at C C double bond in acceptor moiety, ICT process in the
–
acceptor moiety was destroyed and FRET could no longer operate,
leading to the donor emission at 534 nm was recorded. The visible light
excitation (440 nm) and the spacing between two emission peaks (76
nm) could meet the requirements for the ratiometric detection.
3