LETTER
Norbornahemicucurbiturils
2445
(5) Svec, J.; Necas, M.; Sindelar, V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 2378.
(6) Li, Y.; Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Meng, X.; Wu, A. Cryst. Growth Des.
2009, 9, 4255.
(7) Aav, R.; Shmatova, E.; Reile, I.; Borissova, M.; Topić, F.;
Rissanen, K. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3786.
(8) Buschmann, H.-J.; Cleve, E.; Schollmeyer, E. Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 8, 125.
(9) Buschmann, H.-J.; Zielesny, A.; Schollmeyer, E. J. Incl.
Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2006, 54, 181.
(10) Cong, H.; Yamato, T.; Feng, X.; Tao, Z. J. Mol. Catal.
Chem. 2012, 365, 181.
to the center of the macrocycle cavity whereas the norbor-
bornane groups are reversed out.
The filtrate that was left after collecting the precipitate
from the reaction mixture was analyzed by MALDI-TOF
MS. Surprisingly, not only the six-membered macrocycle
was found but also macrocycles with 4, 5, 7, and 8 ethyl-
eneurea units were detected in the spectrum (Figure 4).
Until now, only six- and twelve-membered hemicucurbi-
turils have been reported. This unexpected result is cur-
rently under investigation.
(11) endo-3,5-Diazatricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]decane-4-one (1): A
solution of 2 (0.27 g, 1.8 mmol) in MeOH–CH2Cl2 (12 mL,
4:1 v/v) was stirred under an atmospheric pressure of H2 in
the presence of 10% Pd/C (0.12 g) for 22 h. The resulting
mixture was filtered through Celite, washed with MeOH (15
mL) and the combined filtrates were concentrated in vacuo
to give 1 (0.26 g, 1.7 mmol, 95%) as a white solid; mp
235.7–236.1 °C (dec.). IR (KBr): 710 (m), 774 (m), 1131
(m), 1252 (m), 1351 (m), 1466 (m), 1690 (s), 2871 (m), 2949
(s), 3067 (br. m), 3218 (br. s) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3, 30 °C): δ = 1.36 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, C(8,9)-HA), 1.39
(d, J = 11 Hz, 1 H, C(10)-HA), 1.48 (d, J = 11 Hz, 1 H,
C(10)-HB), 1.71 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, C(8,9)-HB), 2.32 (s, 2 H,
C(1,7)-H), 3.96 (s, 2 H, C(2,6)-H), 4.75 (br s, 2 H, NH); 13
C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ = 21.7 (C(8,9)-H2), 36.4
(C(10)-H2), 40.8 (C(1,7)-H), 57.7 (C(2,6)-H), 163.6 (C=O).
HRMS: m/z calcd. for [C8H12N2O+H]+: 153.1022; found:
153.1022.
Figure 4 MALDI-TOF MS (HCCA, positive mode) of the filtrate
after the macrocyclization of 1 (M[n] = NorHmCB[n])
In conclusion, a new hexameric derivative of hemicucur-
bituril has been isolated and fully characterized. endo-3,5-
Diazatricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]]decane-4-one was used as an eth-
ylene urea derivative for the macrocyclization. Hemicu-
curbiturils differing in the number of glycoluril units are
side products of this reaction.
(12) Groaz, E.; Banti, D.; North, M. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 204.
(13) Hossain, D.; Lavoie, G. G. Synth. Commun. 2012, 42, 1200.
(14) Eissenstat, M. A.; Weaver, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
3387.
(15) Norbornahemicucurbit[6]uril (NorHmCB[6]):
Compound 1 (0.25 g, 1.6 mmol) was dissolved in 4 M aq
HCl (20 mL) at 70 °C. Paraformaldehyde (0.054 g, 1.8 mmol
of CH2O) was added and the resulting mixture was heated at
70 °C for 4 h (during this period a white precipitate formed).
The solid material was collected by filtration, washed with
H2O (10 mL), and dried in vacuo. The desired macrocyclic
product was separated from the crude mixture by silica gel
column chromatography (acetone–CHCl3, 1:4 v/v). Yield:
0.024 g (0.024 mmol, 8.9%); mp >250 °C. IR (KBr): 614
(m), 760 (m), 813 (w), 1216 (s), 1372 (s), 1441 (s), 1699 (s),
2871 (m), 2961 (m), 3437 (br m) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3, 30 °C): δ = 1.28 (d, J = 13 Hz, 6 H, C(10)-HA), 1.34
(d, J = 11 Hz, 12 H, C(8,9)-HA), 1.40 (d, J = 11 Hz, 12 H,
C(8,9)-HB), 1.57 (d, J = 13 Hz, 6 H, C(10)-HB), 2.63 (s,
12 H, C(1,7)-H), 3.50 (s, 12 H, C(2,6)-H), 4.59 (s, 12 H,
C(11)-H2). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ = 21.9
(C(8,9)-H2), 36.4 (C(10)-H2), 39.4 (C(1,7)-H), 49.1 (C(11)-
H2), 57.0 (C(2,6)-H), 160.4 (C=O). HRMS: m/z calcd for
[C54H72N12O6+H]+: 985.5771; found: 985.5777. Anal. Calcd
for C54H72N12O6·2 H2O: C, 63.51; H, 7.50; N, 16.46. Found:
C, 63.55; H, 7.55; N, 15.75.
Acknowledgment
Support for this work was provided by the Czech Science Founda-
tion (P207/10/0695) and the project CETOCOEN (no.
CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0001) from the European Regional Develop-
ment Fund.
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
m
iotSrat
ungIifoop
r
t
References and Notes
(1) Miyahara, Y.; Goto, K.; Oka, M.; Inazu, T. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5019.
(2) Lagona, J.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Chakrabarti, S.; Isaacs, L.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4844.
(3) Masson, E.; Ling, X.; Joseph, R.; Kyeremeh-Mensah, L.; Lu,
X. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 1213.
(4) Mannich, C.; Krösche, W. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 1912,
250, 647.
(16) Havel, V.; Svec, J.; Wimmerova, M.; Dusek, M.; Pojarova,
M.; Sindelar, V. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4000.
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Synlett 2013, 24, 2443–2445