consumption of xanthate was observed, the crude reaction
mixture of cyclized products was therefore heated with
excess manganese dioxide (MnO2, 10 equiv) to completely
aromatize 18a into the desired indole 18 (74%).
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of Mersicarpine 1
Addition of the radical derived from xanthate 10 to
methallyl acetate furnishes intermediate 11, which then
undergoes a 6-exo cyclization to the indole ring. The ensuing
radical 12 is now stabilized by the tert-butyl ester group,
and this extra favorable factor drives the equilibrium in the
crucial step forward.8 Disproportionation of radical 12 leads
presumably to compounds 18 and 18a. The former can also
be produced by electron transfer to the peroxide, accounting
for its higher relative yield (Scheme 3).
followed by nucleophilic substitution of the chlorine atom
by potassium O-ethyl xanthate salt. Previous works in this
field indicated that cyclization should occur regioselectively
at the 2-position of the indole ring.2,4
However, portionwise addition of lauroyl peroxide (DLP)
to xanthate 7 and several equivalents of allylacetate in
refluxing 1,2-dichloroethane gave rise to only a very poor
yield of desired cyclic compound 8 (Scheme 2).5
Scheme 3
.
Preparation of Xanthate 10 and Mechanism of the
Cascade Cyclization
Scheme 2
These disappointing results led us to examine the effect
of activating the indole double bond by a functional group
that could be subsequently removed. To this end, xanthate
10 bearing an electron-withdrawing tert-butoxycarbonyl
group in the 3-position was prepared6 from tert-butylindole-
3-carboxylate 9, which is readily available by treatment of
indole-3-carboxylic acid with oxalyl chloride, followed by
exposure of the intermediate acid chloride to potassium tert-
butoxide in t-butyl alcohol.7
When a stoichiometric amount of DLP was added in
portions (over 1-2 h) to a refluxing solution of 10 and
methallyl acetate (5 equiv) in chlorobenzene, addition to the
olefin and subsequent annelation to the 2-position of the
indole ring took place to give 18 in 49% yield, along with
a mixture of diastereoisomers (18a, 24%), arising from the
premature reduction of radical species 12. Once the total
The same sequence was applied to other olefins to give
tricyclic derivatives 13-22 in comparable overall yield
(Table 1). The results shown in Table 1 are uniformly good.
This process can thus be applied to a large variety of terminal
olefins bearing various types of substituents. Even polym-
erization-prone methyl acrylate could be used (entry 5),
although the yield was slightly lower than average. In this
case, the kinetics of the cascade reaction seem to be fast
enough to circumscribe the untoward tendency to polymer-
ization of methyl acrylate.To expand the scope of the
reaction, the analogous cyclizations using xanthate deriva-
tives of commercially available indole-3-acetic acid,9 indole-
3-carboxaldehyde, and 3-acetylindole were next investigated.
(4) (a) Reyes-Gutie´rrez, P. E.; Torres-Ochoa, R. O.; Mart´ınez, R.;
Miranda, L. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1388. (b) Guerrero, M. A.;
Miranda, L. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2517. (c) Osornio, Y. M.; Cruz-
Almanza, R.; Jime´nez-Montan˜o, V.; Miranda, L. D. Chem. Commun. 2003,
2316. (d) Magolan, J.; Kerr, M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4561. (e) Gross, S.;
Reissig, H. U. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4305
.
(5) For reviews of the xanthate transfer chemistry, see: (a) Zard, S. Z.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 672. (b) Zard, S. Z. In Radicals in
Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P., Sibi, M. P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH; Weinheim
2001, Vol. 1, p 90. (c) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Chem.sEur. J. 2006,
12, 6002. (d) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Top. Curr. Chem. 2006, 264,
201. (e) Zard, S. Z. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 205.
(6) (a) Coste, A.; Toumi, M.; Wright, K.; Razafimahale´o, V.; Couty,
F.; Marrot, J.; Evano, G. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3841. (b) Toumi, M.; Couty,
F.; Marrot, J.; Evano, G. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5027.
(8) The addition of radicals to aromatic rings is known to be reversible.
See: (a) Citterio, A.; Minisci, F.; Porta, O.; Sesana, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 7960. (b) Griller, D.; Marriott, P. R.; Nonhebel, D. C.; Perkins,
M. J.; Wong, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 7761. The reverse reaction,
i.e., the fragmentation of the cyclohexadienyl radicals, has been elegantly
applied in synthesis. For a review, see: (c) Walton, J. C.; Studer, A. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 794.
(7) (a) Janosik, T.; Shirani, H.; Wahlstro¨m, N.; Malky, I.; Stensland,
B.; Bergman, J. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 1699. (b) Ludwig, J.; Lehr, M. Synth.
Commun. 2004, 34, 3691. (c) Battaglia, S.; Boldrini, E.; Da Settimo, F.;
Dondio, G.; La Motta, C.; Marini, A. M.; Primofiore, G. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
1999, 34, 93. (d) Stanovnik, B.; Tisˇler, M.; Carlock, J. T. Synthesis 1976,
754.
ˇ
(9) For the preparation of the corresponding methyl ester, see: Casar,
Z.; Bevk, D.; Svete, J.; Stanovnik, B. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7508.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009
2801