1-(Acyloxy)-2-methoxyanthraquinone Photochromism
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 101, No. 5, 1997 801
migration of acyl groups are significantly higher. It can be due
to a bigger difference in nuclear configurations for the migration
in the ground state than in the excited triplet state.
The migrant nature significantly influences the activation
energy of both thermal and photochemical reactions of acyl
migration. The activation energy of thermal migration increases
from 37.9 ( 0.2 kJ/mol for compound I up to 66.5 ( 0.7 kJ/
mol for compound V with donor diethylamino substituent in
the migrating acyl. The activation energy of the photochemical
process changes from 15.9 ( 0.8 (compounds IV) to 26.0 (
1.7 kJ/mol for compound V. The influence of the nature of
the migratory group on the activation energy can also be due
to the magnitude of the change in the nuclear configurations of
the initial and final states of the reaction of acyl migration. The
preexponential factors are practically independent of the migrant
nature and are equal to 1010-1011 s-1 for the photochemical
process and about 1012 s-1 for the thermal migration.
The quantum yields of photochemical migration of the acyl
group in quinones I-IV are close to unity. Such values are
consistent with the adiabatic nature of the process. The very
low quantum yield (∼0.1) of ana-quinone formation and the
high quantum yield of irreversible photodecomposition in the
case of compound V are connected with the appearance of an
effective side reaction in the excited triplet state of ana-quinone.
The origin of this side reaction will be the subject of further
study.
Figure 14. Computer-generated drawing of 1-acetoxy-2-methoxy-
9,10-antraquinone (a) and 9-acetoxy-2-methoxy-1,10-antraquinone (b).
Geometry was optimized by the AM1 method.
It is seen from Figure 14 that the acetoxy group of quinone
I lies in the plane practically perpendicular to the plane of the
anthraquinone rings. The angle between these planes is even
less than 90° and equals 74° for the a-Q of I and 79° for the
a-Q of V. This angle is also smaller in the triplet states and
equals 70° and 72° for compounds I and V, respectively. It is
clear that the reaction coordinate has to be mainly a combination
of stretching and bending OC modes. According to the results
of the calculations, the difference in nuclear configuration of
the initial and final states will be smaller in the case of
compound I than compounds IV and V. Moreover, this
difference is smaller in the excited triplet states than in the
ground states. Let us assume that the potential energy depen-
dence on the reaction coordinate is harmonic with a frequency
slightly dependent on the substituent in the acyl group. In this
case, the barrier height (or activation energy) will depend both
on the enthalpy of reaction and on the difference in nuclear
configuration of the initial and final states. It is seen that in
our case (thermal and photochemical acyl migration), a higher
rate of migration is observed for the smaller difference in nuclear
configuration.
Acknowledgment. We are very grateful to Dr. L. Lindqvist
for helpful discussions and to Ministere de la Recherche et de
lÅEnseignement for financial support for one of us (Dr. Nina
Gritsan). This work was supported in part by the Russian
Foundation for Fundamental Research (Project 95-03-08920).
References and Notes
As we can see from the experimental data, the photochemical
acyl migration reaction occurs completely on the triplet potential
energy surface. We think that the absence of photoreaction in
the excited singlet state of compounds I-V is due mainly to
the short lifetime of this state. We failed to detect the
luminescence of compounds I-V, which means that the
quantum yield of fluorescence is smaller than 10-3. Using these
data and a rough estimate of the radiative lifetime (∼25 ns),
we can deduce that the lifetime of the singlet excited state is
significantly smaller than 25 ps. It is known that the rate
constant of intersystem crossing between excited states of
different symmetry (ππ* and nπ* states) can be very high
(∼1010-1011 s-1).21 This situation is realized in our case (Figure
13), and it is the reason for the very short lifetime of the singlet
excited ππ* state. It should be noticed that the growth lifetime
of the reactive triplet state of quinone IV from a precursor has
been estimated to be about 70 ps.22 This is longer than our
estimation for the lifetime of the singlet excited state and may
be equal to the lifetime of the intermediate triplet state T2 of
nπ* type.
(1) Gerasimenko, Yu. E.; Poteleschenko, N. T. Zh. Vses. Khim. O-Va.
im. D. I. MendeeleeVa, 1971, 16, 105.
(2) Malkin, J.; Zelenchenok, A.; Krongauz, V.; Dvornikov, A. S.;
Rentzepis, P. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1101.
(3) Gritsan, N. P.; Rogov, V. A.; Bazhin, N. M.; Russkikh, V. V.; Fokin,
E. P. Teor. Eksp. Khim. 1979, 15, 290.
(4) Gritsan, N. P.; Khmelinski, I. V.; Usov, O. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 9615.
(5) Gritsan, N. P.; Russkikh, S. A.; Klimenko, L. S.; Plusnin, V. F.
Teor. Eksp. Khim. 1983, 19, 455.
(6) Gritsan, N. P.; Klimenko, L. S.; Shvartsberg, E. M.; Khmelinski,
I. V.; Fokin, E. P. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1990, 52, 137.
(7) Gritsan, N. P.; Klimenko, L. S. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
1993, 70, 103.
(8) Kellmann, A. J Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 1195.
(9) Gritsan, N. P.; Bazhin, N. M. IzV. AN SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1981, 280.
(10) Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebich, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902.
(11) Bliznyuk, A. A.; Voityuk, A. A. Zh. Struct. Khim. 1986, 27, N4,
190.
(12) Dennis, J. E.; Schnabel, R. B. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained
Optimization and Nonlinear Equations; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs,
NJ, 1983.
(13) Voityuk, A. A. Zh. Struct. Khim. 1983, 24, N3, 18.
(14) Baker, G. A. Ess. Pade Approx. N. Y. 1975.
(15) McKeown, A. B.; Hibbard, R. R. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 1490.
(16) Gijzeman, O. L. J.; Kaufman, F.; Porter, G. L. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 2 1973, 69, 708.
(17) Ermolaev, V. L.; Bodunov, E. N.; Sveshnikova, E. B.; Shakhverdov,
T. A. Radiationless Transfer of Electron Excitation Energy; Nauka:
Lenigrad, 1977; p 190.
(18) Jones, P. F.; Siegel, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 50, 1134.
(19) Bellus, D. AdV. Photochem. 1971, 8, 109.
(20) Gritsan, N. P.; Tsentalovich, Yu. P.; Yurkovskaya, A. V.; Sagdeev,
R. Z. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 4448.
(21) Plotnikov, V. G.; Ovchinnikov, A. A. Usp. Khimii (Russ. Chem.
ReV.) 1978, 47, 444.
(22) Malkin, Ya. N. Private communication.
(23) Nurmukhametov, R. N. Absorption and Luminescence of Organic
Compounds; Khimiya: Moscow, 1971.
4. Conclusions
In the O-acylic derivatives of 1-hydroxy-2-methoxyan-
thraquinone (I-V), photochemical migration of the acyl group
takes place via the triplet excited state. It was confirmed in
the present work that photochemical migration of acyl groups
is an adiabatic process occurring on the triplet potential energy
surface. The absence of photoreaction in the excited singlet
state of compounds I-V is due mainly to the short lifetime of
this state. The process of acyl migration in the triplet excited
state of quinones is termally activated, but the activation energy
is low (15.9 ( 0.8 and 26.0 ( 1.7 kJ/mol for compounds IV
and V, respectively). Activation energies for the thermal