10.1002/anie.202001125
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Conclusion
Table 2. Relative free energies (in kcalmol-1) for the binding of an iodide to
the sigma hole type receptors 1•ChB and 1•XB.
In conclusion, a series of novel heteroditopic receptors were
synthesized, each containing benzo-15-crown-5 ether cation
binding groups covalently attached to 3,5-bis-iodine, tellurium-
and proton-functionalised-triazole pyridine anion binding motifs
providing respective XB, unprecedented ChB and HB ion-pair
receptors. 1H, 13C, 125Te and 19F NMR spectroscopy, ESI-MS and
X-ray crystallography ion-pair binding studies demonstrate the
cooperative recognition of bromide and iodide halide anions via
concomitant sodium cation crown ether complexation of the
respective heteroditopic receptor. This can be rationalized by
favorable electrostatics combined with the crown ether bound
sodium cation facilitating an inductive withdrawal of electron
density from the respective XB, ChB and HB anion recognition
site. Importantly, determined cooperativity factors reveal the ChB
heteroditopic receptor exhibits a remarkable and the largest
enhancement of halide binding strength of over two hundred-fold,
in comparison to the XB and HB heteroditopic receptors. In effect,
sodium cation – benzo-crown ether binding by 1•ChB switches on
the recognition of bromide and iodide halide anions. DFT
calculations suggest crown ether sodium cation complexation
results in a polarization of the ChB and XB heteroditopic receptor
donors as a significant contribution to the origin of the unique
cooperativity exhibited by these systems. These observations
provide evidence for a new mechanism of cooperativity for ion-
pair recognition unique to the mediation of sigma hole interactions
via co-bound cation recognition illustrating an exciting opportunity
for their exploitation in future ion-pair host design.
Reaction[a]
1•ChB + I− → [1•ChB+I] -
ΔG (kcalmol-1)
−4.65
[1•ChB+2Na]2+→ [1•ChB+2Na+I]+
1•XB + I− → [1•XB+I] -
−19.94
−3.92
[1•XB+2Na]2+→ [1•XB+2Na+I]+
−22.23
[a] Optimization and single-point calculations were performed in CHCl3
solvent
Solid state structure determination
Further insight into the ion-pair binding behaviour of the ditopic
host systems was provided by solid state characterisation of the
sodium iodide complex of the hydrogen-bonding receptor 1•HB.
Crystals of the complex 1•HB•2NaI suitable for X-ray structural
determination were grown by slow evaporation of
a
chloroform:acetonitrile 9:1 solution of the receptor 1•HB•2NaPF6
containing two molar equivalents of tetrabutylammonium iodide
(Figure 4). The cations are coordinated by the five oxygen atoms
from the crown ether host, with Na+—O distances ranging from
2.302(10) Å to 2.477(10) Å and their coordination spheres are
completed by additional interactions with water solvate molecules
and iodide anions. The triazole bound iodide anion is
encapsulated within each of the 3,5-bis-triazole pyridine anion-
binding clefts via an array of CH···I- hydrogen bonding
interactions. [29,30]
Acknowledgements
T.B. thanks the Development and Promotion of Science and
Technology Talents (DPST) Project Thailand for a student
scholarship.
Keywords: Chalcogen Bonding • Halogen Bonding •
Cooperativity • Ion-pair receptors• Heteroditopic Receptors.
[1]
[2]
A. J. McConnell, P. D. Beer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5052–
5061.
B. Qiao, A. Sengupta, Y. Liu, K. P. McDonald, M. Pink, J. R.
Anderson, K. Raghavachari, A. H. Flood, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015,
137, 9746–9757.
[3]
J. L. Sessler, S. K. Kim, D. E. Gross, C.-H. Lee, J. S. Kim, V. M.
Lynch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13162–13166.
Q. He, G. I. Vargas-Zúñiga, S. H. Kim, S. K. Kim, J. L. Sessler, Chem.
Rev. 2019, 119, 9753–9835.
[4]
[5]
P. D. Beer, P. K. Hopkins, J. D. McKinney, Chem. Commun. 1999,
1253–1254.
[6]
S. G. Galbraith, P. G. Plieger, P. A. Tasker, Chem. Commun. 2002,
2662–2663.
[7]
M. Zakrzewski, D. Załubiniak, P. Piątek, Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 323–
330.
[8]
Q. He, G. M. Peters, V. M. Lynch, J. L. Sessler, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed
Engl. 2017, 56, 13396–13400.
J. M. Mahoney, G. U. Nawaratna, A. M. Beatty, P. J. Duggan, B. D.
Smith, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 5902–5907.
A. V. Koulov, J. M. Mahoney, B. D. Smith, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003,
1, 27–29.
A. Galan, D. Andreu, A. M. Echavarren, P. Prados, J. De Mendoza, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1511–1512.
W. Walczak, M. Zakrzewski, G. Cichowicz, P. Piątek, Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2019, DOI 10.1039/C9OB02234A.
Figure 4. Solid state structure of the complex 1•HB•2NaI. For clarity non-polar
hydrogen atoms, selected counteranions and water molecules have been
omitted, and only the higher occupancy components of the disordered regions
are shown.
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
F. P. Schmidtchen, J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 5161–5168.
S. K. Kim, J. L. Sessler, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3784–3809.
A. Mele, P. Metrangolo, H. Neukirch, T. Pilati, G. Resnati, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14972–14973.
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.