Electron Beam Induced Transformation of MoO3
mined as the final states in the cases of low and high elec-
tron current densities, respectively. Because of the layered
structure of MoO3 along [010], the oxygen atoms between
the octahedral doubles layers are weakly bounded and
therefore easily lost. The oxygen vacancies exist in the early
stage of the irradiation as plenty of point defects. With the
increase of these vacancies, they aggregate into planar de-
fects and are accommodated by forming CS planes, as ob-
served in both cases. The fact that different current densities
lead to different routes of transformation indicates that
knock-on displacement should not be the main reason re-
sponsible for the reduction, since for a given material, the
knock-on effect is only related with the accelerating voltage.
In addition, similar phenomena of phase changes from
MoO3 to MoO2 observed in a 100 kV electron microscope
[10] also support this point. Therefore radiolysis mecha-
nisms play an important role, which involves the displace-
ment of atoms by transferring the energy deposited in exci-
ton states [1]. Considering either MoO2 with a distorted
rutile structure or the MoO with fcc structure, the trans-
formation from layered MoO3 to either phase must involve
the reconstruction of a considerable number of MoO6 oc-
tahedra. In our experiment, the temperature increase aris-
ing from electron beam heating is estimated using the
method introduced in [1] and proves limited. It means that
the thermal diffusion is negligibly small. However, the
radiolysis process can enhance the diffusion by displacing
the already existing defects in the bulk of the material [7].
Obviously, this diffusion rate is proportional to the current
density of the incident electron beam. In case of low current
density, the process is slow and MoO2 develops from MoO3
following several epitaxial relationships by rearranging the
octahedra, while in case of much higher current density,
due to high diffusion rate, the random movement of defects
makes it more favorable for grains of a new fcc phase to
nucleate. The grains of this new phase also keep uniformly
epitaxial relationship with the matrix and grow rapidly into
the bulk of MoO3.
bitals and only two empty orbitals are available. This ex-
plains the feature A as a shoulder in the last spectrum in
Fig. 7. In addition, the relative weight of t2g and eg contri-
bution is influenced by the distortion of MoO6 octahedra
[22]. From MoO3 to the rutile-like MoO2 and MoO with
rock-salt structure, the octahedra are less distorted, thus in-
creasing the weight of σ (eg) bond and reducing that of π
(t2g) bond. The relative increase in the intensity of feature
B and the further decrease in feature A can be attributed
to the effect of less distorted octahedra.
Other transition metal oxides, such as V2O5 and TiO2,
etc., are reported to be reduced under electron irradiation
to the monoxides with rock-salt structure [3, 7]. Similar
mechanisms may drive this type of transformation. Though
MoO with rock-salt structure was not reported before, it
may exist as small domains within the MoO3 matrix, as
observed in the present experiment.
Our observations of electron beam induced structure
transformations of MoO3 in different routes are highly rel-
evant for the understanding of the phase transformations
in molybdenum oxide systems, in solid state chemistry and
catalysis. The CS mechanism at the beginning stage of re-
duction in both cases (low and high current densities) sup-
ports that this mechanism is generally applicable to dis-
cussions of bulk transition of molybdenum oxides. How-
ever, our results reveal also the complexity of solid state
chemistry of this system depending on chemical or physical
parameters. The reduction of MoO3 to MoO has not been
reported earlier by the current redox discussion of MoO3
in heterogeneous catalysis. MoO with rock-salt structure
could be unexpected since it may hinder the redox process
of MoO3 in catalytic processes. Our work shows that the
formation of MoO in extreme conditions is possible and
can be one of the deactive phases in MoO3 based catalysts.
References
[1] L. W. Hobbs, Chapter 17 in: Introduction to Analytic Electron
Microscopy, J. G. Hren, J. I. Goldstein and D. C. Joy (eds),
Plenum, New York 1979, p. 437.
[2] M. I. Buckett, J. Strane, D. E. Luzzi, J. P. Zhang, B. W. Wes-
sels, L. D. Marks, Ultramicroscopy 1989, 29, 217.
[3] H. J. Fan, L. D. Marks, Ultramicroscopy 1989, 31, 357.
[4] D. J. Smith, M. R. McCartney, L. A. Bursill, Ultramicroscopy
1987, 23, 299.
The ELNES of the O K-edge is very sensitive to the oxi-
dation states of the probed sample, especially for the fea-
tures at about 530 eV and 533.5 eV, which reflect the tran-
sition to the unoccupied t2g and eg anti bonding states of O
2pϪMo 4d hybridized orbitals in a Mo-O octahedral con-
figuration [20, 21]. For MoO3, the maximal valence oxide,
the six t2g and the four eg orbitals are empty and O 1s elec-
trons can be excited into both orbitals. Therefore, the corre-
sponding two features can be observed in the ELNES spec-
trum of MoO3. In MoO2, the t2g orbitals are filled with two
electrons and a decrease in feature A is observed in ELNES
spectrum. The oxide after electron irradiation of high cur-
rent density shows further decreased intensity in feature A,
which indicates a lower oxidation state than that of MoO2.
This is supported by the quantitative analysis on the Mo
M3-edge and the O K-edge, from which the O/Mo stoichi-
ometry is obtained to be close to 1. Therefore, MoO with
rock-salt structure could be the final phase. Assuming the
case of MoO, there are four electrons filled in the t2g or-
[5] P. A. Crozier, M. R. McCartney, D. J. Smith, Inst. Phys. Conf.
Ser. 1989, No 98, 227.
[6] D. S. Su, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374, 732.
[7] J. P. Zhang, L. D. Marks, Surf. Sci. 1989, 222, 13.
[8] M. R. McCartney, D. J. Smith, Surf. Sci. 1989, 221, 214.
[9] M. L. Knotek, P. J. Feibelman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1978, 40, 964.
[10] L. A. Bursill, Proc. Roy. Soc. 1969, A311, 267.
[11] H. Hashimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1954, 9, 150.
[12] O. Bertrand, L. C. Dufour, Phys. Stat. Sol. 1980, A60, 507.
[13] F. Delannay, Phys. Stat. Sol. 1982, A73, 529.
[14] P. L. Gai, Phil. Mag. 1981, A43, 841.
[15] T. Ressler, R. E. Jentoft, J. Wienold, M. M. Günter, and O.
Timpe, J. Phys. Chem. 2000, B104, 6360.
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2004, 630, 1007Ϫ1014
zaac.wiley-vch.de
2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim
1013