4
calculations which, in conjunction with experimental find-
energy barrier of 32.0(29.4) kcal/mol. In transition state TS1-
9, significant twisting about the C -C double bond places
a formally empty p-orbital at C in the best natural bond
ings, have led us to revise our proposed mechanism for the
formation of 2. The relatively new M06-2X functional was
used for geometry optimizations and frequency calculations,
in conjunction with the 6-311+G(d,p) basis set. When
3
4
5
4
8
9
orbital (NBO) resonance form. According to a NLMO
6
analysis, the C
1
-O
1
π-bond donates 2.7% of its electron pair
possible, the energies of optimized structures were recalcu-
lated by using the double hybrid functional B2PLYP-D,
to C , while an O
4
1
lone pair donates 7.9% of its electron
7
density. This suggests that the transformation of 1 to 9 is
more accurately described as a pseudopericyclic cyclization,
by the arrow pushing mechanism illustrated in Scheme 3,
which includes a second-order perturbative component and
an empirical dispersion correction; results for this method
are given in parentheses. Reported energies for both methods
were corrected for zero-point energy calculated at the
M06-2X level, and isomeric sets were constructed so that
energies could be directly compared to that of compound 1
1
0
than as a classical Nazarov-type cyclization.
Once formed, zwitterion 9 can undergo either of two
irreversible transformations (Scheme 3, paths B and C). In
path B, a presumably intermolecular proton transfer generates
(
H
1 is defined as two molecules of 1 and one molecule of
O). All values are reported in kcal/mol.
6
, which is 30.8(23.5) kcal/mol downhill relative to s-cis-1
2
(the kinetics of this step were not modeled). In path C, a
retro-hydroxyalkylation initially affords ion-pair 10. Fol-
lowing proton transfer, this path yields furomollugin (3) and
one molecule of acetone, which are favored enthalpically
over s-cis-1 by 18.7(13.6) kcal/mol. The energy of activation
Scheme 2. Reactivity of Vinylnaphthoquinone 1
E(act)9-10 for the formation of ion pair 10 was estimated to
be 18.0(17.9) kcal/mol by optimizing the reactant 9 and the
dissociation transition state using a PCM water solvation
1
1
model. We assume that the relative energy barriers of
pathways B and C are energetically similar given that
formation of 3 and 6 appears to be irreversible, and that these
two products are formed in near equimolar quantities when
starting from vinylquinone 1 (Scheme 2).
While formation of 9 by this mechanism is predicted to
be feasible at the elevated temperatures required to generate
rubicordifolin (2), transition state TS1-9 is prohibitively high
in energy to explain the ambient-temperature reactivity of 1
12
in THF (Scheme 2). The presence of adventitious acid was
1
3,14
not ruled out in the latter case,
and thus the above
calculations were repeated with protonation at the quinone
carbonyl. Under acid catalysis, the activation energy required
for the formation of 9 decreases to 7.8(6.0) kcal/mol, while
First we discuss the proposed formation of dienophile 5
15
and furomollugin (3). Vinylnaphthoquinone 1 underwent
spontaneous cyclization to provide a 1:1 mixture of 3 and 6
when left as a dilute solution in THF for extended periods
E(act)9-10 decreases to 11.2(11.1) kcal/mol (with a THF PCM
solvent correction). This is consistent with the experimental
2
a
at room temperature (Scheme 2). All attempts to improve
upon the selectivity or yield of this process by changing
solvent, temperature, or pH resulted in either decreased yields
of 3 and 6 or intractable mixtures. Importantly, exposure of
observation that the rate of formation of 3 and 6 is greatly
14
increased in the presence of either Brønsted or Lewis acids.
(
(
8) Reed, A. E.; Curtiss, L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 899.
1
to a variety of Lewis acids, including complexes of Mg,
9) For Natural Localized Molecular Orbital (NLMO) analysis see: (a)
Ti, Al, or Sn, consistently resulted in near instantaneous
formation of 3 and 6, albeit in low isolated yields. The sole
Reed, A. E.; Weinhold, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 1736. (b) H u¨ bler, K.;
Hunt, P. A.; Maddock, S. M.; Rickard, C. E. F.; Roper, W. R.; Salter, D. M.;
Schwerdtfeger, P. Organometallics 1997, 16, 5076.
exception was the action of Sc(OTf)
3
in CH
3
CN, which
(10) For a recent computational analysis of pseudopericyclic cyclizations
see: Duncan, J. A.; Calkins, D. E. G.; Chavarha, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
afforded dimer 8 in 60% yield. These results are significant
when discussing the role that phenylboronic acid plays in
the synthesis of 2 (vide infra).
2
008, 130, 6740, and references cited therein.
(
11) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2999.
Only the activation energy is given here because the T.S. energy is not
directly comparable with the other (gas-phase) results.
Computational results suggest that the formation of 3 and
(
12) Since the reaction mixture was exposed to ambient light, a radical
6
occurs via a reversible cyclization of s-trans-1 to form
mechanism could account for the room temperature cyclization of 1. For a
related, photoinduced cyclization of vinyl quinones see: Iwamoto, H.;
Takuwa, A.; Hamada, K.; Fujiwara, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999,
zwitterion 9 (Scheme 3, path A), passing over a sizable
5, 575. A light-induced radical mechanism in the formation of rubicordifolin
(
4) Frisch, M. J., et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.2, Gaussian, Inc.,
seems unlikely, however, since the reaction vessel was thoroughly wrapped
in aluminum foil prior to thermolysis.
Wallingford, CT, 2009. Complete citation in the Supporting Information.
(
(
5) Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215.
6) (a) Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem.
(13) Butyric acid is a known impurity of “aged” THF: Coetzee, J. F.;
Chang, T.-H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 633, and references therein
(14) For a related room temperature, acid mediated cyclization of vinyl-
p-quinones see: Taing, M.; Moore, H. W. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 329
(15) See the Supporting Information for a complete analysis of proto-
nated 1.
.
Phys. 1980, 72, 650. (b) McLean, A. D.; Chandler, G. S. J. Chem. Phys.
980, 72, 5639.
7) (a) Grimme, S. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 034108. (b) Schwabe, T.;
1
.
(
Grimme, S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 3397.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010
5163