J.H. Park, et al.
Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology A: Chemistry 397 (2020) 112571
−
4
Fig. 1. Color changes observed for R [1.25 × 10
M] upon the addition of various anions.
−
5
Fig. 2. UV–vis spectra of R [1 × 10 M] with incremental addition of TBACN
0-20 μM] in water (HEPES buffer pH 7.2).
[
−6
Fig. 3. Fluorescence spectra of R [1.5 × 10 M] upon addition of TBACN [0-
3
-
6
× 10 M] in water (HEPES buffer pH 7.2) (Inset: Linear plot of intensity with
water (700 mL) and stirred, after which the solid precipitate was col-
lected together by vacuum filtration and wash away with water. The
resulting crude product was recrystallized from ethyl acetate to give
desired product as a solid (6.8 g, 80 % yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz
concentration of cyanide ion).
2.4. Sample preparation for cyanide sensing
−3
CDCl
3
): 1.133 (t, 12H, J=7.2 Hz), 2.012 (s, 4 H), 3.332 (q, 8 H), 4.062
A stock solution of sensor R (1 × 10
M) was prepared in water
−
3
(
7
CDCl
1
s, 4 H), 5.959 (d, 2H, J=2.4 Hz), 6.202 (dd, 2H, J = 9.0, 1.8 Hz),
(
HEPES buffer, pH 7.2). Stock solutions of cyanide ion (1.0 × 10 M)
1
3
.627 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz), 10.102 (s, 2 H) (Fig. S10). C NMR (150 MHz
): 12.809, 26.231, 44.990, 67.614, 93.342, 104.576, 114.449,
30.634, 154.076, 163.788, 187.052 (Fig. S11). HRMS (m/z) calcd. for
were prepared in water (HEPES buffer, pH 7.2). UV–vis titration study
has been carried out as follows: To a fixed volume of R stock solution
3
-
5
-5
(
1 × 10 M), an incremental amount of cyanide ion (0−2 × 10 M)
+
26 37 2 4
C H N O [M+H] : 441.2753, found 441.2766 (Fig. S12).
solution was added. Fluorescence measurements has been carried out as
follows: To a fixed volume of R stock solution (1.5 × 10 M), an in-
cremental amount of cyanide ion (0−3 × 10 M) solution was added.
-
6
-
6
2
(
.3.5. Synthesis
diethylamino)-2,1-phenylene))bis (ethene-2,1-diyl))bis(5-carboxy-1,3,3-
trimethyl-3H-indol-1-ium) iodide (R)
,2′-(butane-1,4-diylbis(oxy))bis(4-(diethylamino)benzaldehyde)
of
2,2′-((1E,1′E)-((butane-1,4-diylbis(oxy))bis(4-
2.5. Protocol for practical application
2
(
(
3 g, 6.81 mmol), 5-carboxy-1,2,3,3-tetramethyl-3H-indol-1-ium iodide
4.7 g, 13.61 mmol) were added to ethanol 100 mL in nitrogen atmo-
Tap water and drinking water used for the analysis are obtained
from laboratory and stored as such. For quantitative estimation, dif-
ferent amounts of cyanide ions were added to these real water samples
because the existing water samples are free from cyanide ions. Then the
UV–vis spectra measured for the water samples in the absence and
presence of different concentration of cyanide ions. The same samples
are validated using HPLC.
sphere and stirred at reflux for 24 h. The reaction mixture was allow-
able to cool down to room temperature. The precipitate was isolated by
filtration and washed ethanol. The resulting crude product was re-
crystallized from acetonitrile and ethanol to give the desired product as
a solid (5.37 g, 72 % yield). H NMR (600 MHz DMSO-d
1
6
2
1
1
6
): 1.198 (t,
2H, J=7.2 Hz), 1.671 (s, 12 H) 2.163 (s, 4 H), 3.621 (q, 8 H), 3.830 (s,
H), 4.394 (s, 4 H), 6.326 (d, 2H, J=1.2 Hz), 6.664 (m, 2 H), 7.167 (d,
H, J=13.8 Hz), 7.648 (d, 2H, J=7.8 Hz), 8.061 (dd, 2H, J = 7.8,
.8 Hz), 8.136 (s, 4 H), 8.476 (d, 2H, J=13.8 Hz) (Fig. S13). 13C NMR
3
. Result and discussion
(
6
150 MHz DMSO-d ): 13.224, 25.786, 27.563, 32.983, 45.455, 50.102,
8.363, 94.385, 108.297, 112.948, 113.559, 123.724, 129.068,
The sensor R was synthesized from 2,2′-(butane-1,4-diylbis(oxy))bis
6
1
1
8
(
4-(diethylamino)benzaldehyde) with 5-carboxy-1,2,3,3-tetramethyl-
1
30.976, 142.117, 146.259, 156.312, 163.306, 163.408, 167.243,
3
H-indol-1-ium. The structure of the sensor was confirmed by H NMR,
+
1
3
79.433 (Fig. S14). HRMS (m/z) calcd. for C52
H
64
N
4
O
6
[M] :
C NMR and HRMS spectral analysis. The anion sensing property of the
1
40.4815, found 840.4825 (Fig. S15).
sensor was examined by UV–vis, fluorescence, H NMR, mass spectral
procedures and theoretical evaluations.
3