protonation pre-equilibrium more towards 1 ꢂ H1, whether
they actually stabilize the transition state 2, or whether they
act through a combination of these effects. The only modest
acceleration is almost certainly a consequence of the lack of
functional groups that can participate in the catalytic process.
Our research efforts are now directed towards the development
of a new generation of building blocks that contain such
functional groups. Given that we have met with promising
degrees of success in our two first attempts to use dynamic
combinatorial chemistry for catalyst development (this study
and ref. 3), we are optimistic that dynamic libraries can be
developed into a practical method for catalyst discovery in the
near future.
Fig. 2 Energy-minimized structures (PM3 level, Spartan00410) of
trimeric hosts 8. Left: minor diastereoisomer and right: major dia-
stereoisomer. Colour code used for labelling atoms: C ¼ grey; H ¼
white; O ¼ red; S ¼ yellow.
Experimental
kinetics of hydrolysis of 1 at pH 4.2 in the absence of hosts 8,
giving k0 of 4.70 ꢀ 10ꢁ4 minꢁ1 (J in Fig 3). Comparison of the
values of kcat and k0 indicates that hosts 8 accelerate the
hydrolysis of 1 by a factor of 2.1.
Acetal 1 and TSA 4 were obtained using the procedures
described in refs. 13 and 14, respectively.
In a typical DCL experiment, the dithiols (10 mM overall)
were suspended in water (1–10 mL) and a NaOH solution
(1.0 M; 1 equiv. with respect to the number of carboxylic acid
groups) was added. After the dithiols had dissolved, the pH
value was adjusted to 8.5. Where appropriate, the TSA 4
(5 mM) was added and the mixtures were allowed to oxidize
and equilibrate for 3–5 days by stirring in an open vial
(evaporated water was replenished every day).
The equilibrium constant (K), enthalpy (DH1) and entropy
(TDS1) of binding of TSA 4 in hosts 8 at 298 K were
determined using isothermal titration microcalorimetry. Guest
solutions (0.91 mM) were titrated into host solutions (0.10
mM, mixture of stereoisomers), all prepared in 10 mM borate
buffer (pH 9.0).
In a typical kinetic experiment, the hydrolysis reaction was
initiated by the injection of 30 mL of 1 (33.3 mM in CH3CN) in
a thermostatted cell initially containing 970 mL of a solution of
either 8 (as a mixture of stereoisomers; 1.34 mM; 1.3 equiv.) or
6 (4.02 mM; 3.9 equiv.) in citrate buffer (10 mM, 970 mL, pH ¼
4.2) at 25 1C. Reactions were monitored by analysing 5 mL
aliquots by HPLC. The pseudo-first-order rate constants were
determined from the slopes of semi-logarithmic plots of [1]
against time.
In order to establish whether this acceleration is due to the
reaction taking place in the hydrophobic cavity of receptors 8,
we studied the hydrolysis of 1 in the presence of 3.9 equivalents
of 6. Unexpectedly, the rate of the reaction in the presence of 6
turned out to increase progressively with time (B in Fig. 3).
The study of the related HPLC traces revealed that, in the
course of the hydrolysis of acetal 1, dithiol 6 is completely
converted to the corresponding disulfide trimers 8 (Fig. 3,
traces a–f).11 Trimer formation most likely occurs under
kinetic control, since under the acidic conditions of the hydro-
lysis experiments disulfide exchange is extremely slow.7,12
During the first 15% conversion, when the amount of hosts 8
is still insignificant, the rate constant for the reaction (obtained
from the slope of the dashed line in Fig. 3) is 4.82 ꢀ 10ꢁ4
minꢁ1, which is—within experimental error—the same as the
value for k0. Control experiments on a solution of 6 revealed
that the production of receptor 8 is independent of the presence
of 1 or its hydrolysis products, indicating that this process is
not templated.
The absence of any catalytic activity due to 6, as well as the
acceleration of the reaction following the formation of the
macrocyclic species, demonstrate that the cavities of receptors
8 are responsible for acceleration of the hydrolysis of acetal 1,
probably through stabilization of the transient positive charge
that develops during the reaction. We have been unable to
ascertain whether hosts 8 accelerate the reaction by shifting the
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Ana Belenguer for help with the HPLC
analyses and to EPSRC, Marie Curie Intra-European Fellow-
ships (MEIF-CT-2003-501648) and the Royal Society for
financial support.
References
1
For reviews, see: (a) S. Otto, Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev.,
2003, 6, 509; (b) O. Ramstrom, T. Bunyapaiboonsri, S. Lohmann
¨
and J.-M. Lehn, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2002, 1572, 178; (c) S. J.
Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, G. R. L. Cousins, J. K. M. Sanders and J. F.
Stoddart, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 898; (d) C. Karan and
B. L. Miller, Drug Discovery Today, 2000, 5, 67.
2
For reviews see: (a) M. M. Mader and P. A. Bartlett, Chem. Rev.,
1997, 97, 1281; (b) D. S. Wilson and J. W. Szostak, Annu. Rev.
Biochem., 1999, 68, 611; (c) G. Wulff, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 1.
B. Brisig, J. K. M. Sanders and S. Otto, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2003, 42, 1270.
3
4
5
C. W. Andrews, B. Fraser-Reid and J. P. Bowen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1991, 113, 8293, and references therein.
Fig. 3 Left: HPLC analyses (300 nm) of the hydrolysis experiments of
1 in the presence of 6 (3.9 equiv.) after a) 1.4; b) 4.9; c) 10.1; d) 24.0; e)
31.3; f) 47.6; g) 55.2; h) 76.6 and i) 97.3 hours. HPLC analyses were
carried out using a 250 ꢀ 4.6 mm Waters Symmetry C18 column with a
mixture of CH3CN–H2O (80 : 20). Acetal 1, product 3 and hosts 8 are
highlighted in green, blue and red, respectively. Right: semi-logarith-
mic plots of the concentration of 1 versus time, t, at pH 4.2 in the
absence of any catalyst (J); in presence of 3.9 equiv. of 6 (B); and 1.3
equiv. of 8 (n). The dashed line represents the tangent of the curve for
the reaction in the presence of 6 at t ¼ 0.
For examples of antibodies raised against quaternary ammonium
salts as TSAs for the catalysis of acetal hydrolysis reactions, see:
(a) D. Shabat, S. C. Sinha, J.-L. Reymond and E. Keinan, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 2628; (b) H. Suga, N. Tanimoto,
A. J. Sinskey and S. Masamune, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
11197; (c) J. Yu, L. C. Hsieh, L. Kochersperger, S. Yonkovich, J.
C. Stephans, M. A. Gallop and P. G. Schultz, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 339; (d) J.-L. Reymond, K. D. Janda and
R. A. Lerner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 1711.
1002
N e w J . C h e m . , 2 0 0 5 , 2 9 , 1 0 0 1 – 1 0 0 3