M. Li et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 60 (2004) 987–993
989
ture was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution
and water, dried with Na2SO4, filtered and rotary evapo-
rated. The product was dissolved in dry toluene (50 ml) and
2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ, 1.0 g) was
added in the solution. After 15 min, triethylamine (6.0 ml)
was added, followed immediately by BF3-etherate (6 ml).
After stirred for 1.5 h at room temperature, the mixture was
washed with water, dried with Na2SO4, filtered and rotary
evaporated.
flask with water and diluted to the mark. Two milliliters of
the solution was transferred to a 10 ml test-tube, and was
tested as described in Section 2.
3. Results and discussion
properties
The compound was dissolved in warm THF (30 ml).
Ethanol (30 ml) was added as a co-solvent. After purged
with N2, 10% Pd/C (1.0 g) and 1.0 ml hydrazine were added.
The solution was stirred at reflux under N2 for 30 min,
cooled to 20 ◦C and poured into water. The aqueous mixture
was extracted with CH2Cl2. The extract was washed with
water, and the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator.
The residue was taken up in CH2Cl2 and applied to a silica
gel column chromatography using hexane–CH2Cl2 (1:2) to
afford the desired compound.
The fluorescence and absorption are shown in Figs. 1
and 2, respectively. The excitation and emission maximum
of TMABODIPY was at 497/510 nm, respectively. The flu-
orescence intensity increased when nitrite was added. Under
the same condition, the maximum absorbance of TMABOD-
IPY was at 497 nm, while that of the product was at 507 nm,
Mass spectra: m/z: 339 (M), 301 (M–2F). IR: (KBr,
800.0
600.0
400.0
200.0
ν cm−1): 3441.3, 3201 (–NH2), 1091.9 (–B–F), 1713.3
=
(–C N), 2924.8 (–CH3).
2.4. Fluorometric analysis
Relative fluorescence (RF) quantum efficiencies were ob-
tained according to the literature [23] by comparing the area
under the corrected emission spectrum of the test sample at
492 nm with that of the solution of fluorescein in 0.1 mol l−1
NaOH whose quantum efficiency is 0.85. The slit width was
both 1.5 nm for excitation and emission, respectively.
0.0
-200.0
400
450
500
550
Wavelength/nm
Fig. 1. Fluorescence spectra of TMABODIPY and the product,
2.5. Determination of nitrite
CTMABODIPY
=
2.0 × 10−6 mol l−1
,
CNO
−
=
2.0 × 10−6 mol l−1
,
2
CHCl = 0.36 mol l−1, CNaOH = 0.52 mol l−1; (—) excitation spectrum of
the product, (· · ·) emission spectrum of the product, (- - -) excitation spec-
trum of the TMABODIPY, (- · -) emission spectrum of the TMABODIPY;
slit width of exitation and emission: 3 and 5 nm, respectively.
Two milliliters of TMABODIPY solution (2.5 ×
10−6 mol l−1) was transferred to a 10 ml test-tube. And a
working solution of 1 ml of nitrite (1.0 × 10−6 mol l−1) was
added followed by 1.0 ml of HCl solution (3.6 mol l−1).
The mixture was diluted to 5.0 ml with water and stood
at 40 ◦C for 30 min. After that, 2.0 ml of NaOH solution
(2.6 mol l−1) was added. Then, the solution was diluted to
the mask with water. Five minutes later, the relative fluo-
rescence intensity was measured at 510 nm with excitation
at 497 nm. The slit width was 3 and 5 nm for excitation and
emission, respectively.
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
2.6. Preparation of samples
0.05
0.00
dure described above directly without further treatment. One
milliliter of the water was transferred to a 10.0 ml test-tube,
and the following operations were as in the procedure in
Section 2.
Fresh vegetable was cleaned and dried, then 10 g of which
was mortared and immerged in 100 ml water. After being
filtered, the solution was transferred to 100 ml volumetric
400
450
500
550
600
Wavelength/nm
Fig. 2. Absorption spectra of TMABODIPY and the product.
CTMABODIPY
=
2.0 × 10−6 mol l−1
,
CNO
−
=
1.0 × 10−3 mol l−1
,
2
CHCl = 0.36 mol l−1, CNaOH = 0.52 mol l−1; (—) absorbance spectrum
of TMABODIPY, (· · ·) absorbance spectrum of the product.