wall loss and losses due to photolysis, and a value of kw
)
9.5 × 10-6 s-1 was measured for nopinone. For the other
compounds, kw ) 1.7 × 10-4 s-1 for IPOH and 7.9 × 10-5 s-1
for MVT, but in the case of the reference compounds
(isobutene, 1-butene, propene, and ethene), no additional
loss process could be identified in the reaction chamber with
UV light and values of <5 × 10-6 s-1 were assumed for kw,
which means that no data adjustment is needed for those
compounds in this investigation. Without UV light, IPOH
showed a first-order decay in our reaction chamber; this
additional loss process was attributed to wall loss, and a
value of kw ) 5.5 × 10-5 s-1 was measured for IPOH. For the
other compounds, kw ) 8.4 × 10-5 s-1 for MVT, but in the
case of nopinone and the reference compounds (isobutene,
1-butene, propene, and ethene), no additional loss process
could be identified in the reaction chamber without UV light,
and values of <5 × 10-6 s-1 were assumed for kw, which
again means that no data adjustment is needed for those
compounds in this investigation. It should be mentioned
that these additional losses are relatively small because the
time range for an experiment is normally between 5 and 15
min. The additional loss process (wall loss + photolysis) was
always below 15% of the overall decay during an experiment
for all of the experiments performed in this investigation.
For the measurements of the reactions of IPOH and MVT
with O3, cyclohexane (270 and 200 ppmV, respectively) was
added to scavenge OH radicals, which are believed to be
formed by the ozonolysis of these olefinic species. For the
reaction of nopinone with O3, no scavenger was used since
nopinone does not contain olefinic double bonds and
because these experiments were performed under pseudo-
first-order conditions without a reference compound present
(1 ppmV ) 2.46 × 1013 molecules cm-3 at 298 K and 760
Torr).
FIGURE 3. Plot of ln {[IPOH]0/[IPOH]t} vs ln {[isobutene]0/
[isobutene]t} (9). Plot of ln {MVT]0/[MVT]t} vs ln {[isobutene]0/
[isobutene] } (b). During photolysis of methylnitrite, producing OH
t
radicals; kw ) losses on wall and/or photolysis.
eter (HP-5972) operated in the chemical ionization (isobutane
as ionizing agent) mode. The compounds trapped in the
aqueous solution of the impinger were derivatized with
O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine using 0.5 mL
of a 1 M phosphate buffer (27) and extracted twice with
solvent (first dichloromethane and then methyl tert-butyl
ether). The analysis was carried out by chemical ionization
GC-MS in the same system used to analyze the Carboxen
tubes as described by Lahaniati et al. (28). The analysis of the
DNPH cartridges was done by solvent extraction (acetonitrile)
followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC,
Kontron) with ultraviolet detection.
Chem icals. Pinonaldehyde was synthesized and identified
as described previously (21). Nopinone was commercially
available from Aldrich (98% pure). IPOH and MVT were
synthesized as described in refs 15 and 29. IPOH, IR spectrum
(gas phase, cm-1): 900 (m), 1161 (m), 1367 (m), 1740 (s),
2714 (m), 2814 (m), 2945 (m), and 3081 (m). EI-MS m/ z 168
(M+, 0), 107 (25), 67 (23), 58 (15), 55 (18), 43 (100), and 41
(32); CI-MS (methane) 169 (M + H+, 20), 151 (100), and 107
(26). MVT, IR spectrum (gas phase, cm-1): 845 (m), 924 (m),
975 (s), 995 (s), 1036 (s), 1210 (m), 1459 (m), 2881 (m), 2935
(m), 2984 (s), 3019 (m), 3102 (m), 3650 (m). EI-MS m/ z 128
(M+, 2), 113 (44), 110 (10), 95 (20), 71 (90), 67 (94), 55 (78),
43 (100), and 41 (53); CI-MS (methane) 127 (M + H+ - H2,
3), 111 (100), 93 (36), and 81 (9). The other chemicals used
in this study were all commercial samples used without
further purification: isobutene (Matheson, >99% pure),
1-butene (99.9% pure, Ucar), propene (Ucar, >99.5% pure),
ethene (g99.5% pure, Air Liquide), synthetic air (80% N2 and
20% O2: mixture g99.95% pure, SIO), and O2 (g99.9% pure,
SIO).
The terpene oxidation products used in this investigation
have a low vapor pressure and become unstable when heated.
Therefore, instead of the normal manometric method, the
following method was applied: Each of the compounds was
introduced into the reaction chamber by applying 10-20
µL of the compound to a filter and gently blowing the vapor
into the reaction chamber by a stream of air. Infrared spectra
were obtained for all four compounds.
Typical initial experimental conditions were 15 ppmV <
[CH3ONO] < 30 ppmV, 10 ppmV < [N2O5] < 100 ppmV, 10
ppmV < [O3] < 300 ppmV, and 1 ppmV < [A] < 10 ppmV
(where A is one of the terpene oxidation products). The
concentration of A was an estimate, based on known cross
sections of similar compounds. All of the kinetics data are
based on relative measurement of the decay of A and the
reference compound, B; therefore, it is not necessary to know
the exact concentrations. The concentrations of the reference
compound [B] were in the range 4 ppmV < [B] < 25 ppmV.
Samples of reaction products were taken in the following
ways: (a) on stainless steel adsorbent tubes (Perkin-Elmer)
filled with 200 mg of Tenax-TA at a sampling flow of 150 mL
min-1 (sampling volume ) 0.3 L); (b) on glass adsorbent
tubes filled with 150 mg of Carboxen 563 at a sampling flow
of 600 mL min-1 (sampling volume ) 12 L); (c) through an
impinger filled with 15 mL of a solution of H2O/ t-BuOH (3:1)
at a flow rate of 800 mL min-1 (sampling volume ) 12 L) (d)
on 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) coated C18-silica gel
cartridges at a sampling flow of 1 L min-1 (sampling volume
) 1 L).
Results and Discussion
Kinetic Studies. In this investigation, we have determined
the rate constants for the reactions of OH, NO3, and O3 with
nopinone, IPOH, and MVT. The values measured are
presented in Table 1 together with the values for pinonal-
dehyde. Typical examples of the results obtained by the
relative rate measurements of the OH, NO3, and O3 reactions
with nopinone, IPOH, and MVT can be found in Figures2-6.
For the relative rate measurement of the reaction between
nopinone and the NO3 radical, in the presence of the reference
compounds ethene and propene, only a very small decay of
nopinone could be observed, and only an upper limit for
that reaction rate constant has been given; no figure is shown
here. For the only pseudo-first-order measurements that were
performed (nopinone + O3), no reaction could be detected,
and thus only an upper limit for that reaction rate constant
has been given; no figure is shown.
The analysis of the Tenax tubes was done by thermal
desorption (ATD 400, Perkin-Elmer) gas chromatography
(Fisons HRGC Mega 2 Series)-mass spectrometry (Fisons
Trio1000) as described in detail elsewhere (26). The analysis
of the Carboxen tubes was done by solvent extraction
(dichloromethane) followed by on-column injection into a
gas chromatograph (HP-5890) coupled to a mass spectrom-
The major oxidation product of linalool (4-hydroxy-4-
methyl-5-hexenal) is a γ-hydroxyaldehyde (15, 18) and exists
9
VOL. 33, NO. 3, 1999 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 4 5 5