tertiary amine as a catalyst and its scope is limited to aldehydes
as acrylamides, crotonic derivatives and ketones are not
reactive. However, a Baylis–Hillman type reaction mediated by
SmI2 is available for both aldehydes and ketones under mild
reaction conditions and with short reaction times.
This work was partially supported by graduate School of
Molecular Science of MOE.
Notes and references
(2)
1 Reviews: (a) D. Basavaiah, P. D. Rao and R. S. Hyma, Tetrahedron,
1996, 52, 8001; (b) S. E. Drewes and G. H. P. Roos, Tetrahedron, 1988,
44, 4653; (c) E. Ciganek, in Organic Reactions, ed. L. A. Paquette, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997, vol. 51, pp. 201 and references cited
therein.
Judging from the three observations, an anion species (B)
appears to be involved in the reaction (Fig. 1). The reaction
might proceed via an allenoate intermediate (C).5,11 Ethyl a-
bromoacrylate or 2-bromocyclohex-2-en-1-one did not give the
desired products. A phenyl group in the amide seems to enable
the formation of the vinylsamarium intermediate (B). The a-
carbon of the acrylamide bearing phenyl group is more electron-
deficient than other moieties bearing alkyl or hydrogen.
Therefore, the vinyl radical can undergo further reduction to
vinylsamarium reagent B by a further mole of SmI2. These
results imply that the reduction of the vinyl radical should be
faster than hydrogen abstraction from THF. To our knowledge,
this is the first example of the generation of the vinyl samarium
intermediate by means of the reduction of bromovinyl com-
pounds! It is noteworthy that the reaction with enolizable
ketones also affords the Baylis–Hillman products.
2 (a) J. M. Brown, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1987, 26, 190; (b) A. H.
Hoveyda, D. A. Evans and G. C. Fu, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 1307; (c) T.
Jenn and D. Heissler, Synlett, 1995, 607; (d) R. Annunziata, M.
Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi and L. Raimond, J. Org. Chem., 1995,
60, 4697; (e) P. Perlmutter and M. Tabone, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60,
6515; (f) C. M. Marson, J. H. Pink and C. Smith, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1995, 36, 8107; (g) Y. Génisson, C. Massardier, I. Gantier-Luneau and
A. E. Greene, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1996, 2869; (h) D.
Basavaiah, M. Bakthadoss and S. Pandiaraju, Chem. Commun., 1998,
1639.
3 M. L. Bode and P. T. Kaye, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1993,
1809.
4 (a) M. Brand, S. E. Drewes, N. D. Emslie and A. A. Khan, Synth.
Commun., 1991, 21, 727; (b) J. Auge, N. Lubin and A. Lubineau,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 7947; (c) V. K. Aggarwal, G. J. Tarver and
R. McCague, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2713; (d) S. Rafel and J. W.
Leahy, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 1521; (e) T. Kataoka, T. Iwama and S.
Tsujiyama, Chem. Commun., 1998, 197; (f) V. K. Aggarwal, A. Mereu,
G. J. Tarver and R. McCague, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7183.
5 For methods using Al, Cu, and others: (a) Y. Sato and S. Takeuchi,
Synthesis, 1983, 734; (b) J. P. Marino and R. J. Linderman, J. Org.
Chem., 1983, 48, 4621; (c) T. Tsuda, T. Yoshida and T. Saegusa, J. Org.
Chem., 1988, 53, 1037; (d) G. Li, H.-X. Wei and S. Willis, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1998, 39, 4607; (e) H.-X. Wei, S. Willis and G. Li, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1998, 39, 8203; (f) P. V. Ramachandran, M. V. R. Reddy, M. T.
Rudd and J. R. De Alaniz, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 8791; (g) G. Li,
H.-X. Wei, B. R. Whittlesey and N. N. Batrice, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
1061; (h) H.-X. Wei, J. D. Hook and K. A. Fitzgerald, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 661.
In summary, it has been demonstrated that the reaction of a-
bromoacrylamides with aldehydes or ketones in the presence of
SmI2 can provide Baylis–Hillman adducts through an anionic
process, solving several problems of Baylis–Hillman reaction.
Baylis–Hillman reactions require long reaction times and a
6 (a) J. S. Hill and N. S. Isaacs, Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 5007; (b) J.
S. Hill and N. S. Isaacs, J. Chem. Res. (S), 1988, 330; (c) G. H. P. Roos
and P. Rampersadh, Synth. Commun., 1993, 23, 1261; (d) M. K. Kunda,
S. B. Mukherjee, N. Balu, R. Padmakumar and S. V. Bhat, Synlett,
1994, 444.
7 Recent reviews: (a) G. A. Molander, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 29; (b) D. P.
Curran, T. L. Fevig, C. P. Jasperse and M. J. Totleben, Synlett, 1992,
943; (c) G. A. Molander, in Organic Reactions, ed. L. A. Paquette, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994, vol. 46, pp. 211; (d) G. A. Molander
and C. R. Harris, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 307; (e) T. Skrydstrup, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 345; (f) G. A. Molander and C. R.
Harris, Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3321; (g) A. Krief and A.-M. Laval,
Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 745 and references cited therein.
8 (a) G. A. Molander and C. Kenny, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 8236;
(b) G. A. Hasegawa and D. P. Curran, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34,
1717.
9 (a) M. Matsukawa, J. Inagana and M. Yamaguchi, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1987, 28, 5877; (b) J. Inagana, M. Ishikawa and M. Yamaguchi, Chem.
Lett., 1987, 1485; (c) T. L. Fevig, R. L. Elliott and D. P. Curran, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 5064; (d) D. P. Curran and B. Yoo, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1992, 33, 6931; (e) D. P. Curran and M. J. Totleben, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1992, 114, 6050; (f) M. Kunishima, K. Hioki, S. Tani and A. Kato,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 7253; (g) L. Capella and P. C. Mon-
tevecchi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 8445; (h) L. Capella, P. C.
Montevecchi and M. L. Navacchia, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 7424; (i)
X. H. Du and R. W. Armstrong, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 2281.
10 Organosamarium intermediates appear to be initiated but unstable in
solution.7 In the absence of electrophiles such as aldehydes or ketones,
the organosamarium species reacted with the substrate itself to form 4a
together with the dehalogenated byproduct 3aA.
11 (a) J. P. Marino and R. J. Linderman, J. Org. Chem., 1981, 46, 3696; (b)
T. Tsuda, T. Yoshida, T. Kawamoto and T. Saegusa, J. Org. Chem.,
1987, 52, 1624.
Fig. 1 Possible mechanism.
2006
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2005–2006