Scheme 2
Scheme 3
of an imide carbonyl group in 5, which allows the low
steady-state population of SKA to be dragged to the desired
products.
To probe if in situ activation of an ester electrophile might
also serve to induce a net, silylative Dieckmann cyclization,
we investigated simple dimethyl R,ω-dicarboxylates (Scheme
4). The reaction proved to be successul for five- and six-
of the SKA to an O-silylated imide carbonyl as suggested
in 7-endo (as opposed to the synclinal geometry of 7-exo).
This reaction could be extended to higher trialkylsilyl
triflates. TBSOTf and TIPSOTf gave products 4b and 4c,
respectively, with comparable outcomes; the only difference
was a progressively slower overall reaction rate (t1/2 ≈ 6
min, 4a; 15 min, 4b; and 7 h, 4c at [2] ) 0.3 M in CDCl3
and 1.5 equiv of R3SiOTf). In addition, we observed a low,
steady-state level of each of the intermediate SKAs 5b and
Scheme 4
membered ring formation, giving excellent yields of the
ketals 12 (dr 2:1) from dimethyl adipate and dimethyl
pimelate (11, n ) 1 and 2). No cyclization was observed
(1H NMR analysis) for substrates that would have given rise
to four-, seven-, and eight-membered rings (11, n ) 0, 3,
and 4).
1
5c by H NMR spectroscopy.4
When the reaction mixture was undercharged with TM-
SOTf, major product 4a was accompanied by a small amount
of R-silylated ester 6 (Scheme 2). This suggested that the
SKA 5 was competitively and, perhaps, reversibly silylated
at the C* vs O* atoms in 5. Indeed, resubjection of isolated
6 to TMSOTf/Et3N in CDCl3 resulted in its clean conversion
to lactam 4a. Simple esters are known to be silylated with
R3SiOTf in diethyl ether.5 As a model we examined the
silylation of methyl propionate (8), but under conditions more
similar to those used for the cyclization of 2 (Scheme 3).
Namely, in CDCl3 solution we could easily monitor (1H
NMR) the extent of conversion to a mixture of SKA 9 and
the R-silylated ester 10. Starting with 2 equiv each of
TMSOTf and TEA, the system equilibrated to a steady-state
mixture of 8:9:10 in a ratio of ∼5:trace:1.
We have also defined some of the scope of the imide
cyclization reaction, particularly with respect to ring size.
Substrate 13 (the one-carbon-longer homolog of 2) smoothly
cyclized to the 6/5-bicyclic lactams 14 and 15 with slightly
lower levels of dr (Scheme 5) compared with 2. The
glutarimide substrate 16 also cyclized in high yield, but the
stereochemical outcome was quite different. TMSOTf gave
rise, predominantly, to the exo adduct 18a, suggesting that
the saturated (and puckered) glutarimide ring deterred an anti-
addition analogous to that indicated in 7-endo (the assign-
ment of relative configuration for 17 vs 18 is based on
convincing differences in NOE effects and coupling constant
data). On the other hand, the bulkier TIPSOTf reagent gave
a nearly 1:1 mixture of adducts 17b and 18b, reflective of a
competitive interaction with the silyl moiety in a synclinal
mode of addition similar to that in 7-exo. The less hindered
(and more reactive) TMSOTf induced competitive elimina-
tion of TMS2O from 17a and/or 18a under the reacion
conditions to give the pyrroline byproduct, 19. Fortunately
(again), in the UCS1025A-relevant cyclization of 2 (and 20,
see below), this type of elimination event is thwarted by
virtue of destabilization of the carbocationic intermediate.
The behavior of chiral imide substrates was also of interest,
so we studied the cyclization of various ether-protected
This observation implies that the success of the cycliza-
tions to form 4 derives from the in situ O-silylative activation
(4) Z-O-Silylketene acetals are more stable than their E-isomers: Wilcox,
C. S.; Babston, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1451-1453.
(5) Emde, H.; Simchen, G. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1983, 816-834.
Figure 1. ORTEP representation of 4a (panel a) and 24 (panel b).
5192
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 23, 2006