Tomasulo et al.
Molecular Modeling. The structure of 3a was built with
GaussView28 and optimized (AM1) with Gaussian.29 In the
resulting geometry, the length of the C-O bond at the junction
of the indoline and benzooxazine fragments is 1.469 Å. This
value was increased in 10 consecutive steps of 0.1604 Å each.
After each increment, the C-O distance was constrained and
the overall geometry was re-optimized (AM1). The profile of
the minimized energy for the C-O distance drive is illustrated
in Figure S6. The structures (3a and 3b in Figure S6)
corresponding to the two energy minima were re-optimized
[B3LYP/6-31G(d)] with no distance constrains. Frequency
calculations [B3LYP/6-31G(d)] on the resulting geometries did
not reveal imaginary frequencies, confirming that they cor-
respond to minima on the potential energy surface. The
transition state for the transformation of 3a into 3b was
identified with the QST3 protocol (AM1), using the geometry
corresponding to the energy maximum in Figure S6 in
conjunction with the corresponding reactant and product. The
resulting structures were then optimized [B3LYP/6-31G(d)]
using the TS option within Gaussian. Frequency calculations
[B3LYP/6-31G(d)] on the final geometry revealed a single
imaginary frequency, confirming that it corresponds to a
transition state on the potential energy surface. The energies
of the three stationary points were corrected to account for
the corresponding zero-point energies, using a scaling factor30
of 1.0119, and are reported in Figure 7.
influence of optical stimulations. In fact, our molecular
design can lead to the development of a new family of
photochromic compounds with unprecedented switching
speeds and remarkable stability and, eventually, evolve
into photonic materials with unique photoresponsive
character.
Experimental Section
2-Nitro-5a,6,6-trimethyl-5a,6-dihydro-12H-indolo[2,1-
b][1,3]benzooxazine (3a). A solution of 1 (291 µL, 1.8 mmol)
and 2-chloromethyl-4-nitrophenol (162 mg, 0.9 mmol) in MeCN
(5 mL) was stirred for 50 min at ambient temperature under
N2. Then, the mixture was stored in a refrigerator for 12 h.
The resulting precipitate was filtered and dissolved in H2O
(40 mL). After the addition of aqueous KOH (0.05 M, 5 mL),
the solution was extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The organic
layer was dried (MgSO4) and filtered, and the solvent was
distilled off under reduced pressure to give 3a (94 mg, 0.3
mmol) as a white solid. The mother liquor of the initial
filtration was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the
residue was purified by column chromatography [SiO2/CH2-
Cl2 f CH2Cl2/MeCO2Et (10:1)] to afford an additional amount
of 3a (60 mg, 0.2 mmol). The overall yield of 3a was 58%.
HPLC [analytical, MeCN/H2O (80:20)]: RT ) 4.5 min, PA )
1.6, APP ) 236.7 ( 1.0 nm; mp ) 180 °C; FABMS: m/z ) 311
[M + H]+; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.17 (3H, s), 1.52
(3H, s), 1.57 (3H, s), 4.60 (2H, s), 6.56 (1H, d, 8 Hz), 6.69 (1H,
d, 9 Hz), 6.82 (1H, t, 8 Hz), 7.07 (1H, t, 8 Hz), 7.11 (1H, d, 8
Hz), 7.92 (1H, dd, 3 and 9 Hz), 8.06 (1H, d, 3 Hz); 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 16.6, 18.9, 26.0, 40.0, 48.0, 102.8, 108.4,
118.2, 118.8, 120.5, 122.3, 123.3, 124.0, 127.6, 138.0, 140.4,
146.6, 159.1.
Steady-State Absorption Spectroscopy. The absorption
spectra were recorded either in aerated MeCN, using quartz
cells with a path length of 0.5 cm, or in PMMA matrixes. The
polymer films were prepared by spin-coating aliquots of CH2-
Cl2 solutions of PMMA (160 mg mL-1) and either 3a or 4a (8
mg mL-1) with and without Bu4NOH (7 equiv) on glass plates
at 420 rpm for 9 s. The thicknesses of the resulting films were
ca. 6 µm and were measured with a digital micrometer.
2-Nitro-5a-phenyl-6,6-dimethyl-5a,6-dihydro-12H-in-
dolo[2,1-b][1,3]benzooxazine (4a). A solution of 2 (700 mg,
3.2 mmol) and 2-chloromethyl-4-nitro-phenol (709 mg, 3.8
mmol) in MeCN (30 mL) was heated under reflux for 48 h.
After cooling to ambient temperature, the solvent was distilled
off under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (30 mL). The resulting solution was washed with
aqueous KOH (0.2 M, 15 mL) and H2O (15 mL). The organic
phase was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the
residue was purified by column chromatography [SiO2/hexane
f CH2Cl2/hexane (1:1 v/v)] to give 4a (680 mg, 58%) as a white
solid. HPLC [analytical, MeCN/H2O (95:5)]: RT ) 3.6 min,
PA ) 2.1, APP ) 261.0 ( 0.1 nm; mp ) 176 °C; FABMS: m/z
Transient Absorption Spectroscopy. The absorption
spectra were recorded with a commercial laser flash photolysis
apparatus either in aerated MeCN, using quartz cells with a
path length of 1.0 cm, or in PMMA matrixes. The excitation
source was a Nd:YAG laser (355 nm, 6 ns, 8 or 12 mJ). The
quantum yield (Φ) for the photoinduced ring opening of 3a
and 4a was determined with eq 1, using an optically matched
MeCN solution of benzophenone as standard. The quantum
yield (ΦBE) for the intersystem crossing of benzophenone is
unity, and the molar extinction coefficient (ꢀBE) for its triplet
1
) 372 [M]+; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.89 (3H, s), 1.60
absorption at 520 nm is 6.5 mM-1 cm-1 31
. The molar extinction
(3H, s), 4.53 (1H, d, 11 Hz), 4.63 (1H, d, 11 Hz), 6.73 (1H, d, 8
Hz), 6.86-6.94 (2H, m), 7.16-7.19 (2H, m), 7.38-7.42 (3H,
m), 7.54-7.65 (2H, m), 7.92-7.94 (2H, m); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 18.6, 27.9, 41.0, 49.9, 105.5, 109.2, 118.3, 120.3,
121.0, 122.6, 123.3, 123.9, 127.9, 128.2, 128.8, 129.1, 136.1,
137.9, 141.4, 147.0, 159.3.
coefficient (ꢀ) of the ring-opened isomers at 440 nm was
estimated to be ca. 22 mM-1 cm-1 from the absorption
spectrum of 8 (e in Figure 8). The terms ø and øBE in eq 4 are
the slopes of the linear portions of plots of the photoinduced
absorbance changes, measured at the end of the pulse, for the
ring-opened isomer and the benzophenone triplet, respectively,
against the energy of the laser pulse.
X-ray Crystallography. Single crystals of 3a were grown
by vapor diffusion of i-Pr2O/hexane into a MeCN solution of
the oxazine. Single crystals of 4c were grown by vapor diffusion
of i-Pr2O into an equimolar MeCN solution of 4a and Bu4NOH.
Crystal Data for 3a: C18H18N2O3, M ) 310.34, monoclinic,
P21/n (no. 14), a ) 8.1728(5), b ) 17.7129(9), c ) 11.0657(6)
Å, â ) 101.171(5)°, V ) 1571.56(15) Å3, Z ) 4, Dc ) 1.312 g
cm-3, µ(Cu KR) ) 0.735 mm-1, T ) 173 K, colorless blocks;
2981 independent measured reflections, F2 refinement, R1 )
0.042, wR2 ) 0.113, 2718 independent observed absorption-
corrected reflections [|Fo| > 4σ(|Fo|), 2θmax ) 142°], 209
parameters. CCDC 272868.
Crystal Data for 4c: (C16H36N)(C23H21N2O4)‚2H2O, M )
667.91, monoclinic, C2/c (no. 15), a ) 37.174(2), b ) 9.2670-
(7), c ) 22.8271(17) Å, â ) 103.270(6)°, V ) 7653.9(9) Å3, Z )
8, Dc ) 1.159 g cm-3, µ(Cu KR) ) 0.616 mm-1, T ) 173 K,
yellow blocks; 7252 independent measured reflections, F2
refinement, R1 ) 0.064, wR2 ) 0.183, 5291 independent
observed absorption-corrected reflections [|Fo| > 4σ(|Fo|), 2θmax
) 143°], 538 parameters. CCDC 272869.
øꢀBEΦBE
Φ )
(4)
ø
BEꢀ
(28) GaussView 2.1; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(29) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.,
Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.;
Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo,
C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov,
B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.;
Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-
Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.7;
Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
8188 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 20, 2005