10.1002/cctc.201701384
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
Ce3+ defect sites promote the adsorption of the substrates and
stabilization of intermediate products.
Wu, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, K. Ding, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 13041-
13045; d) S. H. Kim, S. H. Hong, ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3630-3636.
a) Y. Cui, W. Dai, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 7752-7762.; b) Y. Cui, X.
Chen, W. Dai, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 69530-69539; c) M. Tamura, T.
Kitanaka, Y. Nakagawa, K. Tomishige, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 376-380; d)
C. Lian, F. Ren, Y. Liu, G. Zhao, Y. Ji, H. Rong, W. Jia, L. Ma, H. Lu, D.
Wang, Y. Li, Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1252-1254; e) X. Chen, Y. Cui,
C. Wen, B. Wang, W. Dai, Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13776-13778.
X. Yao, F. Gao, Q. Yu, L. Qi, C. Tang, L. Dong, Y. Chen, Catal. Sci.
Technol. 2013, 3, 1355-1366.
[3]
Conclusions
In summary, a series of Cu/CeO2 catalysts with different copper
content were synthesized by a facile co-precipitation method to
achieve the optimized catalytic performance. Among the as-
synthesized Cu/CeO2 samples, the 20Cu/CeO2 catalyst presents
superb activity for the vapor phase continuous hydrogenation of
DEC to methanol. Catalyst characterization revealed that the
efficiently enhanced catalytic performance is attributed mainly to
the synergism between active copper species and surface defects.
Cu0 species can activate hydrogen and carbonyl groups, and Cu+
and surface defects promote the adsorption of DEC and
stabilization of intermediate products. The loading of copper
influences the interaction between Cu and CeO2 support, further
resulting in the structural evolution. This work holds possibilities
for the achievement of methanol via indirect chemical utilization
of CO2 with an inexpensive and efficient copper-based catalyst.
[4]
[5]
a) L. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Yu, H. He, X. Qin, B. Wang, Catal.
Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 4840-4848; b) Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, J. Lv, X. Ma,
ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 2085-2090.
[6]
[7]
a) L. Liu, Z. Yao, Y. Deng, F. Gao, B. Liu, L. Dong, ChemCatChem 2011,
3, 978-989; b) Y. Li, Z. Wei, F. Gao, L. Kovarik, C. H. F. Peden, Y. Wang,
J. Catal. 2014, 315, 15-24; c) R. Si, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2884-2887; d) E. Aneggi, D. Wiater, C. de
Leitenburg, J. Llorca, A. Trovarelli, ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 172-181.
a) L. Meng, J. Lin, Z. Pu, L. Luo, A. Jia, W. Huang, M. Luo, J. Lu, Appl.
Catal. B: Environ. 2012, 119, 117-122; b) Z. Pu, X. Liu, A. Jia, Y. Xie, J.
Lu, M. Luo, J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 15045-15051.
[8]
[9]
M. Zabilskiy, P. Djinović, E. Tchernychova, O. P. Tkachenko, L. M.
Kustov, A. Pintar, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5357-5365.
B. Wang, Y. Cui, C. Wen, X. Chen, Y. Dong, W. Dai, Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
2016, 509, 66-74.
[10] C. Wen, F. Li, Y. Cui, W. Dai, K. Fan, Catal. Today 2014, 233, 117-126.
[11] Z. He, H. Lin, P. He, Y. Yuan, J. Catal. 2011, 277, 54-63.
[12] a) Y. Cui, C. Wen, X. Chen, W. Dai, RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 31162-31165; b)
B. Skårman, D. Grandjean, R. E. Benfield, A. Hinz, A. Andersson, L. R.
Wallenberg, J. Catal. 2002, 211, 119-133; c) P. Bera, K. R. Priolkar, P.
R. Sarode, M. S. Hegde, S. Emura, R. Kumashiro, N. P. Lalla, Chem.
Mater. 2002, 14, 3591-3601.
Experimental Section
CeO2 nanorods were synthesized by a hydrothermal method as reported
in Ref. [3a]. Then, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O was deposited on the CeO2 nanorods
using the Na2CO3 as precipitant to obtain the Cu/CeO2 catalysts.
Analogously, by adjusting the content of copper respectively, the same
procedures were carried out to synthesis other catalysts xCu/CeO2 (x
denotes the copper content). More experiments details were further shown
in supporting information.
[13] S. Zhan, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Shi, Y. Li, X. Li, Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
2017, 203, 199-209.
[14] X. Liu, J. Ding, X. Lin, R. Gao, Z. Li, W. Dai, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2015,
503, 117-123.
[15] X. Hu, H. Zhang, Z. Sun, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 392, 332-341.
[16] a) L. Chen, P. Guo, M. Qiao, S. Yan, H. Li, W. Shen, H. Xu, K. Fan, J.
Catal. 2008, 257, 172-180; b) X. Guo, M. Lai, Y. Kong, W. Ding, Q. Yan,
C. T. P. Au, Langmuir 2004, 20, 2879-2882.
Acknowledgements
[17] a) J. Gong, H. Yue, Y. Zhao, S. Zhao, L. Zhao, J. Lv, S. Wang, X. Ma, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13922-13925; b) E. K. Poels, D. S. Brands,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2000, 191, 83-96.
This work was financial supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No.21373054, 21173052), and the Natural
Science Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology
Committee (No. 08DZ2270500).
[18] a) Z. Zhang, C. Wu, J. Ma, J. Song, H. Fan, J. Liu, Q. Zhu, B. Han, Green
Chem. 2015, 17, 1633-1639; b) V. Z. Fridman, A. A. Davydov, K.
Titievsky, J. Catal. 2004, 222, 545-557.
[19] a) J. Ye, C. Liu, D. Mei, Q. Ge, ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1296-1306; b) J.
Song, Z. Huang, L. Pan, J. Zou, X. Zhang, L. Wang, ACS Catal. 2015, 5,
6594-6599; c) Z. Huang, J. Song, L. Pan, X. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Zou,
Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5309-5327.
Keywords: Cu/CeO2 • Carbonate Hydrogenation • Copper
content • Surface defects • Synergism
[1]
[2]
M. Cokoja, C. Bruckmeier, B. Rieger, W. A. Herrmann, F. E. Kühn,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8510-8537.
[20] Q. Hu, L. Yang, G. Fan, F. Li, J. Catal. 2016, 340, 184-195.
[21] K. Mudiyanselage, A. E. Baber, Z. Liu, S. D. Senanayake, D. J.
Stacchiola, Catal. Today 2015, 240, 190-200.
a) E. Balaraman, C. Gunanathan, J. Zhang, L. J. W. Shimon, D. Milstein,
Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 609-614; b) E. Balaraman, Y. Ben-David, D. Milstein,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11702-11705; c) Z. Han, L. Rong, J.
[22] N. Asao, T. Nogami, K. Takahashi, Y. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 764-765.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.