9
048
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 9048-9054
Effect of P r essu r e on th e Th er m olysis of Nitr oa lk a n es in Solu tion
,
†
J iang Wang* and Kay R. Brower
Department of Chemistry, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801
Darren L. Naud
American University of Beirut (AUB), Beirut, Lebanon
Received March 27, 1997X
The effect of pressure up to 1.1 GPa on the rates of decomposition of two acidic nitroalkanes,
nitromethane and 2-nitropropane, was measured. The mechanisms of thermolysis are inferred
from kinetic studies and product analysis. The rate-controlling step for nitromethane decomposition
in toluene at 230 °C at low pressures is homolysis of the C-N bond. Beyond 20% conversion, the
decomposition is autocatalytic. At high pressure, nitromethane has another reaction path which
supplants homolysis. It is proposed that nitromethane forms an intermediate by cyclization of its
aci-form. The high-pressure process is characterized by a first-order rate law without primary
kinetic isotope effect, a low activation energy (28.5 kcal/mol), a negative activation volume (-5.5
mL/mol), and formation of products which cannot be attributed to radical intermediates. At high
conversion, the reaction becomes autocatalytic as a result of accumulation of water leading to
formation of products explainable by the Nef reaction. 2-Nitropropane is less stable than
nitromethane. Pressure powerfully accelerates its decomposition owing to its activation volume
averaging -11.2 mL/mol from 0.1 to 1.1 GPa. It is believed to cyclize via the aci-form like
nitromethane. 2,2-Dinitropropane does not have R hydrogen and cannot tautomerize. In earlier
work it was found to have a homolytic mechanism at high pressure. Therefore, the decomposition
pathways of nitroalkanes in aprotic solvents are determined not only by the conditions but also by
the availability of R hydrogen.
In tr od u ction
Nitromethane, the simplest of the aliphatic nitro
CH NO f CH ONO f products
(2)
3
2
3
They found that the activation energy for methyl
nitrite rearrangement is 13 kcal lower than that of the
compounds, is an explosive and monopropellant. Up to
the present, many studies of its thermal stability under
9
1
-6
C-N homolysis. Wodtke et al. on the other hand found
various conditions have been reported.
The pyrolysis
evidence there is only a small difference in activation
energy between homolysis and rearrangement. They
claimed that mechanisms 1 and 2 operate in parallel. Lee,
Sanborn, and Stromberg10 have studied effects of pres-
sure on the rate of decomposition of various explosives,
and nitroalkanes appear to be anomalous. Reported
time-to-explosion measurements on nitromethane indi-
cate that pressure decreases the time required to achieve
an explosion while an opposite effect was found for 2,2-
of gaseous nitromethane at temperatures from 305-440
7
°
C was investigated by Crawforth and Waddington. The
activation energy (E ) was 55.5 kcal/mol which agrees
well with C-N bond dissociation energy, 60 kcal/mol. The
products in order of abundance are CO, CH , H O, N
CO , and small amounts of HCN and oxides of nitrogen.
a
4
2
2
,
2
It was suggested that methyl radicals are generated by
homolysis of the C-N bond and converted to methane
by hydrogen abstraction:
1
1
dinitropropane and other explosives. Engelke et al.
found that high pressure applied to nitromethane in-
creases the concentration of the nitronate ion and pro-
posed that sensitivity is directly related to this effect.
•
CH NO f CH + NO
(1)
3
2
3
2
•
•
CH + CH NO f CH + CH NO
12,13
3
3
2
4
2
2
Miller et al.
reported that pressure increased the
decomposition rate of liquid nitromethane and a reduc-
tion of the frequency of the asymmetric stretching mode
of NO with increasing pressure was observed. They
2
Recently another mechanism involving methyl nitrite
as an intermediate was proposed by Dewar et al.8
proposed a bimolecular mechanism which accounts for
the observed products, ammonium formate and water.
Naud and Brower studied the products and rates of
*
Corresponding author.
Current address: Department of Chemistry, University of South-
†
14
ern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0482.
X
Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, November 15, 1997.
(
(
(
1) Brasch, J . W. J . Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 2084.
2) Brower, K. R. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3776.
3) Engelke, R.; Earl, W. L.; Rohlfing, C. M. J . Chem. Phys. 1986,
(8) Dewar, M. J . S.; Ritchie, J . R.; Alster, J . J . Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 1031.
(9) Wodtke, A. M.; Hintsa, E. J .; Lee, Y. T. J . Chem. Phys. 1986,
84, 1044.
(10) Lee, E. L.; Sanborn, R. H.; Stromberg, H. D. Proc. 5th Symp.
(Intl.) Detonation, 1970, 331.
(11) Engelke, R.; Schiferl, D.; Storm, C. B.; Earl, W. L. J . Phys.
Chem. 1988, 92, 6815.
8
4, 142.
4) Trocino, J . L. Techniques for Sensitizing and Detonating Ni-
(
tromethane-Based Explosive Systems, Bulletin J LTN-2, April 1972;
Sixth Symposium (Intl.) on Detonation, edited by Edwards, D. J ., Ed.
(
Office of Naval Research, Washington D. C.), 1976, p 99.
5) Engelke, R.; Earl, W. L.; Rohlfing, C. M. Int. J . Chem. Kinet.
986, 18, 1205.
(
(12) Miller, P. J .; Block, S.; Piermarini, G. J . J . Phys. Chem. 1989,
93, 457.
1
(
(
6) Cook, M. D.; Haskins, P. J . 19th Intl. Annu. Conf. ICT 1988.
7) Crawforth, C. G.; Waddington, D. J . Trans. Faraday Soc. 1969,
(13) Miller, P. J .; Block, S.; Piermarini, G. J . J . Phys. Chem. 1989,
93, 462.
6
5, 1334.
(14) Naud, D. L.; Brower, K. R. High-Pressure Res., 1992, 11, 65.
S0022-3263(97)00563-X CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society