N. Yadav et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 148 (2015) 311–317
315
methyl group at 4-position of coumarin while signal at 56.0 ppm
is due to methylene carbon.
UV–visible analysis
It is well established that coumarin absorbs light in the UV
region and transmits in the remaining region as shown in Fig. 4.
The crystal was transparent in the entire visible and IR region.
The absorption spectrum of compound was recorded in different
solvents of various polarities such as acetonitrile, chloroform,
DMF, ethylacetate and methanol in order to see solvatochromic
effects. The Kamlet–Taft parameters (
study the polarity and hydrogen bonding properties of the solvents
used in the present experiment [38]. Here is a scale of solvent
a
, b, and p⁄) were used to
a
hydrogen bond donor (HBD) acidities, b is a scale of solvent hydro-
gen bond acceptor (HBA) basicities and p⁄ denotes scale of solvent
dipolarity/polarizability which refers the ability of solvent to
stabilize a charge or a dipole.
The p⁄ value is correlated with the solvatochromic behavior
values. The solvatochromic effect of a compound is due to the
interaction between the solute and solvent molecules and showed
Fig. 6. Emission spectrum of 7-(Prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-2H-chromen-2-one.
shift of the
p–
p⁄ band [39]. The absorption spectra of the com-
pound was recorded in various solvents and showed absorption
maxima in the UV region at 316.94 nm in acetonitrile, 319.42 nm
in chloroform, 317.88 nm in DMF, 316.33 nm in ethylacetate and
320.03 nm in methanol. All these values are tabulated in Table 1.
The absorption peak at wavelength specifically in between 315
and 320 nm can be assigned as n–p⁄ transition and may be attrib-
uted to the excitation in C@O group of pyrone ring. It is clear from
analysis of the spectral results that there is practically no solvato-
chromism as there is no significant change in absorption as seen
from the Table 1.
within experimental error and the H13A atom lies in the plane of
pyrone ring while the H13B and H13C atoms are displaced equidis-
tantly above and below the ring, respectively. The molecule shows
intermolecular hydrogen bonding between carbon and oxygen C–
Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁO as seen earlier [32]. The intermolecular hydrogen bond
between atom C3–H3ꢁ ꢁ ꢁO3 have bond length of 2.267 Å with
1.5 ꢃ x, ꢃy, ½ + z symmetry code while C13–H13Bꢁ ꢁ ꢁO2 shows
2.689 Å, little longer bond length than standard value having
1.5 ꢃ x, ꢃy, ½ + z symmetry code. Overall, these intermolecular
hydrogen bonds help in crystal packing and stabilize the structure
of molecule in three dimensional. The short interactions between
atoms C1–H1ꢁ ꢁ ꢁC1–H1 (bond length 2.689 Å & symmetry code
½ + x, ½ ꢃ y, 2 ꢃ z) form a dimeric unit at 7-substituted position
and thus plays critical role in crystal packing. The crystal packing
diagram is shown in Fig. 3.
The energy gap between HOMO and LUMO is a critical parame-
ter in determining molecular electronic transport properties. The
maximum absorption wavelength (kmax) corresponds to the elec-
tronic transition from the HOMO to LUMO with major contribution
[40]. The energies of the four important molecular orbital of the
title compound; the second highest and highest occupied
molecular orbitals (HOMO and HOMOꢃ1), the lowest and the sec-
ond lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO and LUMO+1)
were calculated and are presented in Table 2 along with other
thermodynamical parameters in Table 3. The lowest singlet to
singlet spin allowed excited states were taken into account for
the TD-DFT calculations in order to investigate the properties
of the electronic absorption. The calculations were performed
with acetonitrile, chloroform, DMF, ethylacetate, and methanol
solvents. The calculated absorption wave lengths, excitation ener-
gies, major contribution for the transition and corresponding oscil-
lator strengths are given in Table 1 along with experimental
wavelengths. The observed wavelengths show a very good agree-
ment with the calculated wavelengths using TD-DFT with 6-
311G (d,p) for all the solvents. The calculations with higher basis
sets were also performed and marginal increases in the wave-
lengths have been observed. From Table 1 it is clear that the calcu-
lated peaks for all the solvents lies between 303 and 306 nm and
FT-IR spectral analysis
Peak at 3303 cmꢃ1 is due to stretching in terminal alkyne C–H
while peak at 2369 cmꢃ1 is due to [HC„C] stretching. The experi-
mental IR values are in well agreement with the calculated fre-
quencies given in supporting material Table S3. The characteristic
absorption bands are also found consistent with the functional
groups presented in the molecule as shown in Table S4.
Experimental and calculated IR spectra are shown in supporting
information Figs. S1 and S2.
NMR analysis
1H NMR spectra shows characteristic peaks, singlet at position
2.4 ppm due to methyl proton attached 4-position of coumarin
and a singlet at 2.57 ppm due to alkyne proton. Further, down field
singlet at 4.76 ppm corresponded to two methylene protons (–O–
CH2–). The down field signal is due to the presence of electron
withdrawing group adjacent methylene group. In aromatic region,
singlet at position 6.16 ppm corresponded to H3 proton of cou-
marin pyran ring while multiplet at 6.93 ppm and 7.50 ppm corre-
sponded to H5, H6 and H8 proton of aromatic ring respectively. The
13C NMR spectrum of compound is depicted in supporting informa-
tion. Carbonyl carbon shows at 160.24 ppm and aromatic carbons
present at 102.04–152.35 ppm. Signal at 18.56 ppm is due to
can be assigned as p–
p⁄ transition. There are no significant changes
in wavelength with different solvents which indicates that solvato-
chromism is not possible so there is not any significant change in
absorption. The 3D plots of important molecular orbitals are shown
in Fig. 5. The energy gap of HOMO–LUMO explains the eventual
charge transfer interaction within the molecule and the frontier
molecular orbital gap in this case is 4.480 obtained from B3LYP/
6-311G (d,p) and 6.382 obtained from HF/6-311G(D.P) as shown
in Table 3. The molecular orbitals show that the electron density
mostly centered on the substituent’s and pyrone ring, clearly