Homolytic Reactivity of Group 14 Organometallic Hydrides
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 5, 1998 1691
[
NOX]
I ∝
(20)
2
(
Wint + b[O ])
2
intensity of the EPR lines increases since the silyl
radicals produced in reaction 12 react with oxygen rather
than with the nitroxide. While oxygen is consumed in
the reaction vessel, the width of the EPR lines decreases
and their height increases. Only when most of the
oxygen has been consumed do the silyl radicals begin to
react with TEMPOL-d17 (eq 14) and the EPR signals of
the latter start to decrease.
In another experiment the triethylsilyl adduct to
TEMPO was prepared by reacting the nitroxide with
Et Si radicals in triethylsilane containing an equimo-
3
lecular amount of the TBHP initiator at 50 °C. This
adduct (identified by its mass spectrum) was kept at 80
Simulation of the time dependence of the intensity of
the EPR spectrum of TEMPOL-d17 during the course of
the reaction provides the ratio of the rate constants for
the combination of silyl radicals with oxygen and with
the nitroxide k13/k14
simultaneous differential eqs 17 and 18 gave the best fit
to the experimental points by using k13/k14 ) 6.1, i.e., the
3
Et Si radicals react with oxygen six times faster than
with the nitroxide. The absolute value of k13 has not been
measured in solution but only in the gas phase (ca. 1.5
°
C for 12 h without observing any appreciable decomposi-
tion.
On this basis it can be concluded that only the adducts
of the polysilanes, (TMS) SiH and (TMS) Si(H)Me, frag-
3
2
.
Numerical integration18 of the
ment at the oxygen-nitrogen bond via a concerted
mechanism to afford aminyl radicals which give the
observed amine. This reaction can take place only if the
3 2
hydrogen transfer from the (TMS) SiH or (TMS) Si(H)Me
to the aminyl radical (eq 9) is characterized by a rate
constant large enough to compete with other possible
pathways for the decay of the aminyl radical. Despite
the great number of rate constants for the reaction of
simple alkyl radicals with different substrates, kinetic
data for nitrogen-centered radicals are substantially more
1
0
-1 -1 19
×
10
.
M
s
)
for the reaction of Me
3
Si radicals with
O
2
By assuming this value also in benzene, k14 is
9
-1 -1
estimated to be ca. 2.5 × 10 M
s
, thus implying that
20
the reaction of silyl radicals with nitroxides is so fast that,
in the absence of oxygen, all other reactions of silyl
radicals can be safely disregarded.
21
limited. Newcomb and co-workers have measured rate
constants for the bimolecular reactions of thiols and tin
hydride with dialkylaminyl radical and Roberts and
Ingold22 have found that the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperi-
dinyl radical decays, following pseudo first-order kinetics,
by abstracting a hydrogen atom from most of the solvents
used.
To measure the rate constants for hydrogen abstraction
from silanes by hindered aminyl radicals, 2,2,6,6-tetra-
methylpiperidine was reacted in the EPR cavity with tert-
butoxy radicals, photolytically produced from di-tert-butyl
peroxide in deoxygenated benzene or tert-butylbenzene,
in the presence of a given silane. UV irradiation of the
solutions resulted in the immediate formation of a radical
whose EPR spectrum showed nitrogen and proton split-
The following step in the proposed reaction mechanism
for the deoxygenation of the nitroxide to give the amine
(eqs 4-9) is represented by the cleavage of the nitrogen-
oxygen bond of the silylaminoether to give an aminyl
radical via either a two-step pathway implying the
formation of a silanoxyl radical (6) which undergoes fast
rearrangement to 7 (eqs 7, 8) or a concerted path leading
directly to 7 (eq 7′). In the case of the reaction with
(
TMS)
since the final products are identical. On the other hand,
the fact that neither amine, nor silanol (Et SiOH or
Ph SiOH), formation was observed when reacting TEMPO
with Et SiH or Ph SiH suggests that the tris(trimethyl-
3
SiH the two mechanisms cannot be differentiated
3
3
3
3
silyl)silyl adduct to TEMPO (4) undergoes a concerted
fragmentation. It would be hard to justify why cleavage
of the nitrogen-oxygen bond to give aminyl and silyloxy
radicals (eq 7) should occur only in the case of 4 and not
tings and a g-value (aN 14.66 G, a (18H) 0.82 G, g 2.0046)
characteristic of the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl radi-
cal (5). When the light was shut off, the EPR signals
disappeared following good pseudo first-order kinetics
with decay times dependent on the nature and concen-
tration of the silane present in the system. In the case
H
in that of the Et
3 3
Si or Ph Si adducts.
To further investigate this point the silane was reacted,
under free radical conditions, with nitromethane, MeNO
In this case the silyl radicals are known to add to MeNO
to give the corresponding silyloxy-nitroxides (eq 21) which
2
.
2
3
of (TMS) SiH also the EPR spectrum of the corresponding
silyl radical was visible; however, its decay was much
faster than that of the aminyl radical.
8
decay by fragmentation at the N-O bond (eq 22) to afford
The room-temperature rate constants, reported in
Table 4, were obtained from the measured kEPR values
and the concentration of the silanes in the assumption
that each molecule of silane traps two aminyl radicals.
The Arrhenius parameters for reaction 9 are also listed
in Table 4 while the corresponding plots are shown in
Figure 3.
3
MeNdO and R SiO. The latter radical is expected to
abstract a hydrogen atom from the starting silane, thus
giving the silanols Et SiOH and Ph SiOH (eq 23) for R
Et and Ph, or to undergo reactions 8 and 10 to afford
the siloxane (Me Si) Si(H)OSiMe for R ) Me Si.
3
3
)
3
2
3
3
GC/MS analysis of the final mixtures of the reactions
of nitromethane with the three silanes revealed, in all
cases, the major products as those resulting from nitro-
gen-oxygen cleavage of the intermediate silyloxy nitrox-
A remarkable feature of the data in Table 4 is the
unusually low values of log A which for hydrogen
2
4
abstraction reactions are normally in the range 8.5-9.0.
3 3 3 2 3
ides, i.e., Et SiOH, Ph SiOH, and (Me Si) Si(H)OSiMe .
(
20) Newcomb, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1151, and references
therein.
(21) Newcomb, M.; Horner, J . H.; Shahin, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
(
(
17) Hyde J . S.; Subczynski, W. K. J . Magn. Reson. 1984, 56, 125.
18) Cheney W.; Kincaid, D. Numerical Mathematics and Comput-
34, 5523. Musa, O. M.; Horner, J . H.; Shahin, H.; Newcomb, M. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3862.
(22) Roberts, J . R.; Ingold, K. U. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 3228.
ing; Wadsworth: Belmont, 1985.
19) Niiranem, J . T.; Gutman, J . J . Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 4106.
(