1028 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 3, 2004
Mitchell and McAloney
chromophore about its polar axis may impart chirality to the
surface and, thereby, give rise to SHG-OA. The polar axis
defines the tilt angle (θ) of the chromophore relative to the
surface normal. The tilt (θ) and twist (ψ) angles are illustrated
in Figure 7 for the case of an indole chromophore. Simpson
and co-workers26,27 have suggested that asymmetry in the twist-
angle distribution of an achiral chromophore could arise from
the presence of a chiral center in the molecule. The chromophore
may be sufficiently removed from the chiral center that no direct
electronic coupling occurs, and the chromophore remains
effectively achiral. The chiral center has the effect of directing
assembly of the chromophore at the surface. Such an effect could
be important for the trp systems studied in this work, but we
believe that this is unlikely. To illustrate how the effect could
operate, consider the model structure for Boc-trp at the air/water
interface shown in Figure 7b. Note that the twist angle of the
indole chromophore is related to the torsion angle indicated in
Figure 7b. In particular, asymmetry in the twist angle distribution
implies restricted rotation with respect to the torsion. Such a
restricted rotation is unlikely considering the probable magnitude
of the torsional barrier.34 One could argue that intermolecular
interactions in the surface layer might effectively lock the
conformation, but this seems unlikely in view of the fluid nature
of the air/water interface.
the dipeptide Boc-trp-trp can be understood by considering that
the indole groups may be too far apart to allow significant
coupling. We found no indication of SHG-OA for the peptide
gramicidin, which includes several trp residues. This shows that
the presence of trp is not a sufficient condition for observation
of SHG-OA. The conformation and orientation of the peptide
at the interface are additional important factors. In future work
it is planned to continue this investigation of the origin of SHG-
OA in these biomolecular/surface systems.
5. Conclusion
We have measured the second-order nonlinear susceptibility
tensors for monolayer films of two enantiomerically pure
tryptophan derivatives and for an achiral hydroxynaphthyl
derivative at the air/water interface, for the fundamental
wavelength λ ) 564 nm. A satisfactory analysis of data from
quarter-wave plate rotation measurements was obtained by using
the assumption that only electric-dipole effects contributed to
the nonlinear response. Optical isomers of mono- and ditryp-
tophan compounds show approximately equal magnitudes and
opposite signs of the chiral components of the nonlinear
susceptibilities, as expected for isotropic surface films. Spectra
of the second harmonic efficiency versus fundamental wave-
length for the tryptophan derivatives showed resonance en-
hancement at the two-photon level, associated with the indole
chromophore of tryptophan. An interpretation of our results in
terms of an asymmetric orientational distribution of the (achiral)
indole chromophore appears not to be applicable. Instead, it is
suggested that the nonlinear chiral response may have its origin
in dipole coupling between chromophores, as in the case of
circular dichroism in linear spectroscopy of tryptophan deriva-
tives. From a practical point of view, it is significant that the
nonlinear response is observed in a lower energy spectral region
(λ/2 ∼ 280 nm) compared with the strongest chiral effects in
linear spectroscopy (λ < 230 nm). From a comparison of results
for mono- and ditryptophan derivatives, no evidence was found
for excitonic coupling effects in the nonlinear chiral response.
The peptide gramicidin showed no detectable optical activity
in second harmonic reflection from the air/water interface. This
shows that the presence of one or more tryptophan residues in
a peptide or protein is not a sufficient condition for observation
of optical activity in second harmonic reflection.
The above considerations lead to the suggestion that the origin
of SHG-OA for the trp systems is an intrinsic molecular chiral
response. Of course, Boc-trp and Boc-trp-trp are chiral mol-
ecules, but the asymmetric carbon centers are separated from
the indole chromophores by a methylene (-CH2-) linking
group (see illustration in Figure 7). These compounds neverthe-
less display strong circular dichroism (CD) in linear spectros-
copy in the spectral region below 230 nm35 and generally much
1
1
weaker CD effects in the region of the La and Lb excitations
of indole near 280 nm.36 These CD effects in linear spectroscopy
of tryptophanyl compounds have their origin in dipole-dipole
coupling between similar or dissimilar chromophores including
indole and amide groups that are present in a chiral arrangement.
The excited electronic states and associated intramolecular
interactions that are responsible for strong circular dichroic
effects in linear spectroscopy of tryptophan residues should also
be significant for SHG-OA.
A coupled chromophore, electric-dipole mechanism of SHG-
OA is potentially important for the dipeptide Boc-trp-trp, due
to the presence of indole chromophores in spatial proximity. In
the work of Frey and co-workers,7 significant SHG-OA was
observed for Boc-trp-trp at air/water interface but not for Boc-
trp. These observations are suggestive of coupling between trp
residues. However, in this study we found closely similar SHG-
OA for Boc-trp and Boc-trp-trp, in disagreement with the report
of Frey and co-workers. The origin of this discrepancy is not
clear. Our observations indicate that excitonic coupling between
indole chromophores is not a dominant mechanism of SHG-
OA for Boc-trp-trp. Instead, the proximity of indole to an
asymmetric carbon center may be the significant factor, as in
the case of optical activity in linear spectroscopy. We believe
that coupling between transition dipoles on indole and amide
(NHCO) chromophores could give rise to the observed SHG-
OA effects. These dissimilar chromophores are present in a
chiral arrangement (see the chemical structure of Boc-trp in
Figure 7). Such a mechanism for SHG-OA, involving coupling
of dissimilar chromophores, is a generalization of the mechanism
discussed by Hache et al.24 and by Belkin et al.,25 involving
the coupling of two identical chromophores. The relative
unimportance of interactions between indole chromophores in
Acknowledgment. The authors thanks Prabhat Arya and
Michael Barnes for chemical synthesis of Boc-trp-trp and Linda
Johnston for assistance in the work on gramicidin D.
References and Notes
(1) Petralli-Mallow, T.; Wong, T. M.; Byers, J. D.; Yee, H. I.; Hicks,
J. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 1383.
(2) Byers, J. D.; Yee, H. I.; Hicks, J. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101,
6233.
(3) Byers, J. D.; Yee, H. I.; Petralli-Mallow, T.; Hicks, J. M. Phys.
ReV. B 1994, 49, 14643.
(4) Kauranen, M.; Verbiest, T.; Maki, J. J.; Persoons, A. J. Chem. Phys.
1994, 101, 8193.
(5) Verbiest, T.; Kauranen, M.; Persoons, A.; Ikonen, M.; Kurkela, J.;
Lemmetyinen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9203.
(6) Stolle, R.; Loddoch, M.; Marowsky, G. Nonlinear Opt. 1994, 8,
79.
(7) Crawford, M. J.; Haslam, S.; Probert, J. M.; Gruzdkov, Y. A.; Frey,
J. G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 229, 260.
(8) Fasman, G. D., Ed.; Circular dichroism and the conformational
analysis of biomolecules; Plenum Press: New York, 1996.
(9) Shen, Y. R. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1989, 40, 327.
(10) Smiley, B. L.; Vogel, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 3140.
(11) Vogel, V.; Smiley, B. L. Proc. SPIE 1992, 1922, 86.
(12) Smiley, B. L.; Vogel, V. Proc. SPIE 1994, 2125, 59.