538
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 56, No. 3, March, 2007
Kalyazina et al.
Scheme 2
results in the decrease in the extent of its incorporation
into the copolymer composition. As a result, the coꢀ
polymers with a high content of the cationic groups are
formed.
Thus, the radical copolymerization of macromonoꢀ
mer 1´ with compound 2 makes it possible to prepare
highꢀmolecularꢀweight copolymers in good yield and with
a high content of the cationic groups (up to ~50%), which
was impossible for the copolymerization of monomeric 1
with compound 2. The specific features of the copolyꢀ
merization are caused by the nature of the comonomers
and also by the viscosity of the reaction medium, which is
higher for the copolymerization of the macromonomer
and the second comonomer than that for the copolymerꢀ
ization of two comonomers. Varying the initial ratio of 1´
and 2 and controlling the viscosity of the reaction soluꢀ
tion, one can synthesize copolymers with different conꢀ
tents of the cationic groups. The cyclolinear structure of
the cationic blocks provides the high charge density due
to which the synthesized copolymers become additionally
valuable and the boundaries of their possible use are exꢀ
tended.
It has previously been shown10,11,17 that during the
homopolymerization of monomer 1 the chain transfer
to the monomer results in the formation of radicals caꢀ
pable of continuing the kinetic chain upon the cleavage
of the material chain, i.e., the efficient chain transfer
to the monomer occurs to form the terminal double
bonds. The copolymerization of macromonomer 1´
with compound 2 was carried out at these double bonds,
and the corresponding copolymers of different compoꢀ
sition were synthesized and identified for the first time.
It is found that the radical copolymerization with the
vinylic monomers can be performed at the terminal
double bonds in macromolecules 1´, resulting in the forꢀ
mation of highꢀcation copolymers. The copolymerization
constants of macromonomer 1´ with compound 2 were
determined.
1´ + О Н•
2 + ОН•
1´•
2•
(2)
(3)
fraction of 1´ in a monomeric mixture, step (2) becomes
rateꢀdetermining to an increasing extent. At the same
time, an increase in the concentration of macromonoꢀ
mer 1´ (which is inevitable with an increase in its molar
fraction in a monomeric mixture) increases the viscosity
of the initial monomeric mixture, decreasing the probꢀ
ability of collisions of the terminal double bonds of the
macromolecules with the active radicals. As a result, the
efficiency of reaction (2) decreases and, as a consequence,
the yield and viscosity of the product decrease (see
Table 1). This is confirmed by the above mentioned exꢀ
periments, which showed that in the absence of comꢀ
pound 2 macromonomer 1´ does not react in postꢀpolyꢀ
merization, perhaps because of too low concentration of
active centers localized at the ends of the polymeric molꢀ
ecules at high viscosity of the solution and steric hinꢀ
drance caused by large sizes of macromolecules 1´.
Thus, the formation of copolymers with a high conꢀ
tent of cationic groups is due to the fact that one elemenꢀ
tary act of the interaction of 1´ introduces several charged
groups (instead of one group as in the case of copolymerꢀ
ization with monomeric compound 1) to the copolymer
composition rather than by the high reactivity of the
macromonomer. The number of these groups is deterꢀ
mined by the degree of polymerization of 1, which was
characteristic of macromonomer 1´ introduced into coꢀ
polymerization with compound 2. In other words, as alꢀ
ready mentioned above, the formation of copolymers with
a high content of the cationic groups is due to the fact that
the macromonomer itself represents a ready block of the
cationic monomeric unit. In addition, the copolymer
composition is also determined by a decrease in the probꢀ
ability of collisions of the acrylamide molecules and radiꢀ
cals under the conditions of high viscosity of the solution
with an increase in the content of macromonomer 1´ and,
hence, the yield and intrinsic viscosity of the formed coꢀ
polymers decrease in this case (see Table 1). This is caused
by a decrease in the conversion of compound 2, which
References
1. M. F. Hoover, J. Macromol. Sci.ꢀChem., 1970, A4, 1327.
2. H. Dautzenberg, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 7810.
3. V. F. Kurenkov, Soros. Obrazov. Zh. [Soros Educational
Journal], 1997, 7, 57 (in Russian).
4. S. Han, M. Hagiwara, and T. Ishizone, Macromolecules,
2003, 36, 8312.
5. S. Benermann, M. Buback, P. Hesse, T. Junkers, and
I. Lacik, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 509.
6. N. Yu. Erin and V. M. Popov, Khimiya Rastitel´nogo Syr´ya
[Chemistry of Plant Raw Materials], 2000, 2, 61 (in Russian).
7. V. V. Malyshev, Ekologiya Proizvodstva [Ecology of Producꢀ
tion], 2006, 5, 12 (in Russian).
8. D. Zhang, X. Song, F. Liang, Z. Li, and F. Liu, J. Phys.
Chem., B, 2006, 110, 9079.