11862 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 104, No. 51, 2000
Andrews and Boxer
TABLE 4: Calculated and Observed Vibrational Stark
Effects of HCN and CH3CN.
Stark and absorption results agreed with expected trends,
showing small difference dipoles and greater symmetry effects
upon improved mechanical coupling.
HCN
obsa
CH3CN
obsc
For the aromatic nitriles studied, Hammett numbers correlate
with both transition dipole moments and |∆µ| values, likely
making them a good predictive tool. More broadly, it was shown
that transition dipoles correlate well with |∆µ| values for all
mononitriles and, to a lesser extent, for dinitriles. To a large
extent, the correlation for mononitriles is consistent with that
expected from the anharmonicity of the nitrile bond. However,
Stark effects are larger than just those expected from anhar-
monicity, suggesting that other contributions are important as
well.
The ability to routinely measure vibrational Stark effects to
good precision makes it possible to investigate molecular
vibrations in condensed phases in a new and sensitive manner.
This technique has previously been shown to be useful for
measuring an electric field change in a series of myoglobin
mutants,1 and has been studied here to clarify the physical
origins of vibrational Stark effects.
property
unit
calcb
calcb
|M|
|∆µ|
∆R|
A|
D
0.134
0.0055 0.0582
0.0010 0.0263/f
0.0402 -0.60/f
0.0172
0.0066
0.0425
0.171
0.384
0.0082
0.033
D
0.05/f
Å3
-2/f
1.2/f
0.37/f
2
2
Å3
0.157
0.182
0.79/f
|∆µ|/|M| unitless
0.452/f
0.0244 -0.034/f
0.0952 0.045/f
∆R|/|M| (MV/cm)-1 -0.05/f
2
2
A|/|M|
(MV/cm)-1 0.03/f
a Unweighted averages of the values for the three subbands; assumes
one-dimensional behavior and that B is 0. b Highest level of calculation
from Reimers and Hush.22 c From data where ø angle dependence was
measured; values do not assume one-dimensional behavior, but do
assume B is 0.
in the absence of solvent.22 It is seen that all of the experimental
Stark parameters are several times greater than the calculated
values, and are often larger by more than an order of magnitude.
However, consideration of the Stark parameters in relation to
the transition dipole values results in significantly better
agreement. In particular, calculations for the acetonitrile transi-
tion polarizability and the difference dipole moment are within
about 25% of the measured values. The large discrepancies seen
for hydrogen cyanide are not surprising due to the strong solvent
effects that were observed.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Arun Chattopadhyay who
made early contributions to the VSE of simple nitriles, and Prof.
Noel Hush for helpful discussions. This work was supported in
part by a grant from the NSF Chemistry Division. The FTIR
facilities are supported by the Medical Free Electron Laser
Program of the Office of Naval Research under Contract
N00014-94-1-1024.
Conclusions
A method for measuring vibrational Stark spectra has been
developed and applied to the infrared absorption of the nitrile
stretch mode of several aliphatic and aromatic nitriles. While
most compounds were not analyzed enough times for detailed
error estimates, the precision of the method can be reasonably
estimated by averaging the standard deviations for all repeated
experiments. Difference dipoles, which invariably dominated
the Stark effects, were reproducible to within (0.001 D/f, giving
a Stark tuning precision of (0.02/f cm-1/(MV/cm). Difference
polarizabilities and transition polarizabilities led to smaller
absorption changes, and could be measured reliably with
precisions of 0.3 Å3/f 2 and 0.1 Å3/f, respectively.
References and Notes
(1) Park, E. S.; Andrews, S. S.; Hu, R. B.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem.
B 1999, 103, 9813.
(2) Park, E. S.; Thomas, M. R.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc., in
press.
(3) Onsager, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1936, 58, 1486.
(4) Stryer, L. Biochemistry, Fourth ed.; W. H. Freeman and Com-
pany: New York, 1995.
(5) Laberge, M.; Sharp, K. A.; Vanderkooi, J. M. J. Phys. Chem. B
1997, 101, 7364.
(6) Phillips, G. N. J.; Teodoro, M.; Li, T.; Smith, B.; Gilson, M. M.;
Olson, J. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8817.
(7) Kolling, O. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16087.
(8) Nyquist, R. A. App. Spectrosc. 1990, 44, 1405.
(9) Spitzer, R. C.; Sievers, A. J.; Silsbee, R. H. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
1992, 9, 978.
The VSE data show that |∆µ| values are typically smallest
for symmetric dinitriles, larger for aliphatic nitriles and largest
for aromatic species. The values of |∆µ| are virtually all within
the range of 0.01 D/f to 0.04 D/f, which is several orders of
magnitude smaller than typical values for electronic Stark
effects24 and a factor of 2 to 8 smaller than those seen for the
VSE of carbon monoxide1 or nitric oxide2 bound to the heme
iron in myoglobin and heme model compounds. Where com-
parable experimental data exist, the |∆µ| values are in good
agreement.26,9 Compared to theoretical results, they are several
times larger than those predicted from ab initio calculations for
isolated molecules,22 but agreement improves significantly when
Stark parameters are considered relative to transition dipoles.
While the nitrile stretch mode is typically well separated from
other molecular vibrations, only about half of the samples
studied exhibited well defined single bands. The other samples
had multiple bands arising from Fermi resonant interactions,
varying degrees of hydrogen bonding, and perhaps multiple
sample conformations. Most dinitriles exhibited multiple bands
as well, reflecting symmetric and antisymmetric stretch modes.
It was found that Stark parameters were generally similar for
bands that arose from Fermi resonance, whereas they differed
between bands arising from different modes. While the dinitrile
data were not as simple as their symmetry might suggest, both
(10) Lambert, D. K. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 3847.
(11) Andrews, S. S.; Boxer, S. G., in preparation.
(12) AM1 level calculations using MacSpartan (Wave function Inc.).
(13) Charles, S. W.; Cullen, F. C.; Owen, N. L. J. Mol. Struct. 1976,
34, 219.
(14) DeLeon, R. L.; Muenter, J. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 3992.
(15) Kumar, A. P.; Rao, G. R. Sepctrochim. Acta Part A 1997, 53, 2033.
(16) Michel, H.; Lippert, E. Acetonitrile-The structure of the liquid and
solid phases and the nature of the liquid-solid-phase transition. In Organic
Liquids. Structure, dynamics, and chemical properties; Buckingham, A. D.,
Lippert, E., Bratos, S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1978; p 293.
(17) Pace, E. L.; Noe, L. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 5317.
(18) Reimers, J. R.; Hall, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3730.
(19) Thomas, B. H.; Orville-Thomas, W. J. J. Mol. Struct. 1971, 7, 123.
(20) Hush, N. S.; Reimers, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 15798.
(21) Mathies, R. A. Experimental and theoretical studies on the excited
electronic states of some aromatic hydrocarbons through electric field
perturbation and through chemical substituents, Cornell University, 1974.
(22) Reimers, J. R.; Zeng, J.; Hush, N. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100,
1498.
(23) Wortmann, R.; Bishop, D. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 1001.
(24) Bublitz, G. U.; Boxer, S. G. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1997, 48,
213.
(25) Jucks, K. W.; Miller, R. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 6059.
(26) Chattopadhyay, A.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
1449.
(27) Andrews, S. S.; Boxer, S. G. ReV. Sci. Inst. 2000, 71, 3567.
(28) Long, F.; Freedman, T. B.; Tague, T. J.; Nafie, L. A. Appl.
Spectrosc. 1997, 51, 508.