Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 154 ͑10͒ D538-D542 ͑2007͒
D541
atomic steps. Diffusion of the adatoms through atomic steps is then
improved again, allowing the growth of a smoother surface. Based
on these mechanisms, addition of a C2H5I stream in the dilution gas
during deposition leads to coatings presenting a continuous base. Al
films grown on Pt using DMEAA and surfactant assistance also
yield continuous and whisker-free morphology ͑Fig. 4͒. As I pre-
sents an atomic radius far larger than that of Al, and is a low surface-
energy element, it segregates at the surface during the growth and
results in no significant contamination, as was attested by EDS.
The mechanisms of Al and Pt codeposition are different from
those prevailing for single elements. However, due to the lack of in
situ observations, we can only make several assumptions. Pt depo-
sition using Me3͑MeCp͒Pt presents an induction period followed by
an autocatalytic growth.7 The autocatalytic growth appears when the
Pt clusters’ size allows the catalytic properties to appear. During
codeposition, Al growth prevents Pt atoms from forming clusters.
The deposition rate of platinum drops dramatically. The reduced
concentration of Pt in the films is attributed to this phenomenon. The
shift of growth rate to higher temperature indicates further interac-
tions between the two precursors. According to Nakajima et al.,17
DMEAA decomposes in dimethylethylamine and alane while ap-
proaching the surface. Two possibilities can be foreseen for the in-
teraction between the alane and the Pt precursor: First, alane would
react rapidly with the Pt precursor in the gas phase thus reducing the
availability of the latter in the deposition process. Second, the alane
would adsorb on the substrate, with the Al atom first. As the Pt
precursor coordinates to the surface through the cyclopentadienyl
ligand,7,19 this ligand may remain at the aluminum surface. The
work of Zhuk et al. enlightens the influence of such an adsorption on
Al film growth.18 This phenomenon results in the decrease of the
growth rate of Al and ultimately of the film, since Al is the major
component of the latter. Moreover, it is worth noting that the area of
an adsorbed cyclopentadienyl on a Pt ͑111͒ surface is about ten
times larger than that of Al.6,19 This difference can also explain to a
certain extent the morphological perturbation of Al films in the pres-
ence of Me3͑MeCp͒Pt.
Figure 6. Surface SEM micrograph of sample AlPt2: Al and Pt codeposited
on Ti6242 at 523 K.
Al, with several Al–Pt compounds, such as PtAl2, Al21Pt8, Al21Pt6,
Pt2Al. No preferential orientation could be observed in Al.
Discussion
Vahlas et al.11 reported that MOCVD processed Al coatings from
TIBA on silicon carbide strongly depend on surface pretreatments.
Deposition on Ti6242 is more straightforward as nucleation is easier
on metallic surfaces. DMEAA allows deposition on Ti6242 of con-
tinuous films without pretreatments, as well. The activation energy
of DMEAA processed Al coatings on Ti6242 ͑0.3 eV͒ is consistent
with those reported in the literature ͑between 0.1 and 0.7 eV, de-
pending on the substrate͒.14-17 However, DMEAA seems to be very
sensitive to the nature of the substrate. Jang et al. demonstrated that
a better conductivity of the substrate decreases the activation
energy.14 The value determined by Jang for conductive substrates
͑TiN͒ is three times lower than the one estimated in the present
work. However, other studies using Si as a substrate indicate higher
values than Jang’s ones,15,16 and modeling of DMEAA decomposi-
tion on Al surface resulted in Ea = 0.3 eV;17 it can thus be con-
cluded that this is an accurate value for activation energy on metallic
surfaces.
The loose microstructure of the AlT2 sample can be linked to the
catalytic properties of Pt. Deposition of Al from TIBA can lead
spontaneously to the formation of whiskers, as described by Zhuk et
al.18 The obtained whiskers are rather thick ͑—a few hundreds na-
nometers in diameter—͒ and present many bends but no branching.
This behavior has been observed on Ti6242, as well. This growth
mode is due to adsorption on the Al surface of precursor ligands
leading to volatile compounds with Al adatoms. Surface mobility of
those compounds allows their concentration on preferential sites
where they are decomposed, forming the growing whiskers. This
whiskers growth mechanism seems to be enhanced by the Pt sub-
layer. Whiskers appearing then are thinner and branched ͑sample
AlT2͒. It has been reported that co-adsorption of ferrocene on the
surface prevents such a behavior through the blocking action of the
adsorbed cyclopentadienyl groups.18 These adsorbed cyclopentadi-
enyl groups seem to prevent such behavior, avoiding then the whis-
kers growth. However, this solution could not be applied here, be-
cause of the resulting undesirable Fe contamination. On the other
hand, copper deposition encounters rough and discontinuous micro-
structures. As has already been mentioned, the use of surfactant,
namely C2H5I, allows to achieve continuous and smoother films.8 It
has been reported that alkyliodides are dissociatively adsorbed on Al
surfaces, with the C–I bond breaking since 200 K.9 According to
Tölkes et al.,17 the iodine atoms may act in two ways. First, by
lowering the surface energy of the system, the balance between the
activation energies for nucleation and for growth of Al is shifted
towards the nucleation, this resulting in surface smoothening. Sec-
ond, the presence of I lowers the Ehrlich-Schwoebel barrier, i.e., the
energy barrier responsible for the diffusion of adatoms across the
The above observed microstructures can be correlated to the per-
formance of the as processed oxidation barriers. Thermogravimetric
tests were performed in dry air on such processed samples, with the
test conditions and the obtained results reported in Ref. 1. The link
between samples’ morphology and oxidation behavior was estab-
lished and quantified through the parabolic rate constant of oxida-
tion kinetics, kp ͑mg2 cm−4 s−1͒, determined by plotting the mass
gain vs square root of time.20 It is recalled that sample AlT1 yields
no reduction of the kp compared with the bare alloy. Also, in the
same test conditions samples AlD2 and AlPt2 showed an improve-
ment of the oxidation protection, resulting in a kp ten times lower
than that of the bare alloy. This improvement can be attributed to the
compactness of these films and their smoother surface morphology
with regard to films processed in conditions AlT1.
Conclusion
The deposition of several micrometers thick Al by MOCVD us-
ing TIBA and DMEAA on titanium alloy Ti6242 leads to films with
a continuous base, no C contamination and no preferred orientation.
The surface of such films is composed of Al crystals, smaller for
DMEAA-processed films. When deposited on Pt sublayer in similar
conditions, the deposits are mainly composed of very thin whiskers.
By adding a C2H5I stream in the dilution gas, the obtained micro-
structure is whisker-free, continuous, with no texture. No C con-
tamination could be detected, and I concentration remains at the
EDS detection threshold. Simultaneous deposition of Pt and Al leads
to Al coatings containing Pt–Al phases. A lower growth rate than
those of single elements and an Al/Pt ratio in the films higher than
the input gas phase are characteristics of the specific growth mecha-
nism taking place during codeposition. Those interferences between
decomposition mechanisms and coatings characteristics can be ex-
plained by competitive adsorption at the growing surface and the
difference between the Al and Pt catalytic behaviors. The direct
Downloaded on 2015-05-03 to IP 138.251.14.35 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).