358
C. Zlotea et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 426 (2006) 357–362
Table 1
Aesar). The elements were placed in a Ta tube, which is sealed by welding in an
Ar atmosphere and subsequently heated up to 1073 K in a high frequency induc-
tion furnace under 300 mbar of Ar. In order to avoid long time air exposure, the
samples were manipulated and stored inside a glove box under Ar atmosphere.
Prior to any characterization, the powder samples were ground and filtered to
particle sizes less then 60 m.
Hydrogen absorptions were performed through the gas–solid interaction
using an autoclave system at different hydrogen pressures and temperature pro-
files. Prior to hydrogen absorption, the system was evacuated to a base pressure
of 10−2 mbar and flushed several times with hydrogen gas. The hydrides were
prepared by repeating several heat-treatments in hydrogen atmosphere in order
to crack the oxide layer and to ensure a direct access of hydrogen to the pure
compound. The temperature profile was 1 h heating to 643 K, 5–20 h dwelling
and 8 h cooling to 300 K, 2–5 times at the applied hydrogen pressure.
The structural properties were determined by X-rays diffraction (XRD) mea-
surements using a Guinier-Ha¨gg camera with Cu K␣1 radiation and Si as internal
standard. The experimental crystallographic constants were refined using the
CELREF program based on the least-squares method. Mg24Y5 crystallizes in
Phases formed by hydrogen disproportionation of Mg24Y5 at different applied
pressures (bar) at 643 K
P(H2) (bar)
Disproportionation phases
1.5–5
10
20–30
YH2 + Mg
YH2 + Mg + MgH2 + YH3
YH3 + MgH2
The results are obtained for 3 heat-treatment cycles in hydrogen atmosphere
with a temperature profile of 1 h heating, 5–20 h dwelling and 8 h cooling to
300 K.
from 300 to 643 K several times. This heat-treatment in hydro-
gen atmosphere causes disproportionations of the compound for
pressures between 1.5 and 30 bar. The obtained phases at differ-
ent pressures, as determined by XRD, are shown in Table 1 and
Fig. 1.
˚
the cubic ␣-Mn type structure with the refined lattice parameter a = 11.257(2) A,
which is in good agreement with earlier results [9–11]. In the XRD pattern of
Mg24Y5, extra diffraction peaks with very weak intensities were observed and
were identified as Mg2Y.
At hydrogen pressures below 5 bar, Mg24Y5 undergoes a
complete disproportionation with the formation of YH2 and
metallic Mg. At hydrogen pressures above 10 bar, Mg24Y5
decomposes into YH2, YH3, MgH2 and metallic Mg. The reac-
tion rate was slow and thermodynamic equilibrium conditions
were not obtained despite several heat-treatment cycles. At the
hydrogen pressure of 20 bar, a complete reaction of Mg and Y
and only YH3 and MgH2 are seen in the XRD patterns. Y hydride
might have a catalytic effect in the formation of MgH2, as pre-
viously suggested for rare-earth hydrides in the Ce–Mg–H [16]
and La–Mg–H [17] systems. Although, the role of the Y hydride
in the formation of MgH2 remains an open question and is still to
address. The diffraction peaks of the Y hydrides are very broad
indicating either small particles sizes or strain in the crystallites.
These results allow us to propose a two-step mechanism for the
hydrogen absorption of Mg24Y5. During the first step, YH2 and
pure metallic Mg are formed. The second step promotes the for-
mation of YH3 and MgH2. The disproportionation mechanism
can be understood in terms of the thermodynamics of elementary
hydride formation. The heats of formation ꢀHf of YH2, YH3
and MgH2 are −114, −89 and −37 kJ/mol H, respectively [18].
The formation of YH2 is the most favorable, which explains
Surface analyses of the initial compound were performed at room temper-
ature by X-rays photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements using a Phi
Quantum 2000 instrument with a monochromatic Al K␣ source (1486.6 eV).
In order to determine the surface and bulk chemical modulation with depth,
selected areas were bombarded by Ar+ and sequentially analyzed. The total
sputtering time for depth profiling was approximately 7 min. The investigated
electronic levels were Mg 2p, Y 3d and O 1s. Both metallic and oxidized Mg and
Y atoms are present at the surface. The oxidized Mg and Y peaks completely
vanish after approximately 1 min of sputtering. The binding energy of Mg 2p
peak (49.8 eV) after 1 min of sputtering is in agreement with the value of pure
Mg or other Mg-rich alloys [1]. The binding energy of the metallic Y 3d5/2
peak (156.4 eV) is shifted compared to the value of pure Y (155.8 eV) [12].
The chemical shift is understood in terms of changes in the atomic environment
of Y occurring upon the compound formation. A surface segregation with Mg
enrichment is evidenced since the Mg/Y ratio is approximately twice as large in
the oxidized layer of the surface (after 40 s of Ar+ sputtering) compared to the
bulk (after 7 min of Ar+ sputtering), which is in agreement with earlier studies
[13]. Previously, it was established that the driving force towards surface seg-
regation is the difference in surface energy of the alloying elements in vacuum
conditions [14,15]. Within this model, Mg atoms will preferentially segregate
to the surface, even before air contact.
Microstructural analyses were performed by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) techniques before and after heat-treatments in hydrogen
atmosphere. The SEM measurements were carried out using a high resolution
LEO 1550 microscope equipped with an in-lens detector. The TEM specimen
was characterized by a Jeol2000FXII microscope operating at 200 kV. The EDS
analysis was performed by an INCA instrument. The preparations of the spec-
imens for SEM and TEM investigations were made by dispersing the powder
materials on a carbon tape and a copper grid with a thin carbon film, respectively.
Prior to the SEM and EDS measurements, the specimens were exposed to air.
Mg24Y5, with a small homogeneity range on the Mg-rich
side, crystallizes in a related cubic ␣-Mn type structure, space
group I-43m [9–11]. According to the XPS measurements, the
surface of the initial sample is enriched with Mg and partially
covered with both Mg and Y oxides. The Mg24Y5 sample was
exposed to different hydrogen pressures in the temperature range
550–650 K. Mg24Y5 starts to react with hydrogen at 573 K, but
to crack the oxide layer and to ensure a direct access of hydro-
gen to the pure compound, the temperature has to be increased
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of hydrogenated Mg24Y5 at 643 K and 1.5, 10 and 20 bar
hydrogen pressures.