136
Y. Li et al. / Journal of Solid State Chemistry 170 (2003) 135–141
was added to the mixture of MoO3 and KBH4, and then,
the mixture of MoO3, KBH4, and CCl4 was transferred
into a 1 L autoclave. The autoclave was purged by Ar.
The autoclave was heated from room temperature to
3001C, and kept at 3001C for 4 h. In the process of
elevation of the temperature, the pressure in the
autoclave was observed. From the rate of change of
pressure in the autoclave, we could know whether the
reaction between MoO3, KBH4, and CCl4 proceeds
slowly or quickly as a lot of gases such as H2 and/or HCl
are produced when the reactants begin to react with
each other. After the reaction, the gases were let out,
and the autoclave was cooled to room temperature. The
product mixture was passivated by allowing a mixture of
1% O2/N2 to diffuse into the autoclave at a flow rate of
100 mL/min for 2 h to prevent the product from
violently oxidizing if exposed to air immediately
following the reaction. The final product is obtained
by dissolving the above-mentioned mixture in distilled
water, thoroughly washing, filtering, exchanging with
acetone for several times, and drying at room tempera-
ture.
Characterization of catalysts: The composition of as-
synthesized samples was determined according to the
procedure as follows. The content of C was measured on
Perkin-Elmer 240; the content of Mo and B was
determined by using induced coupled plasma (ICP) on
TJA1100. BET surface area of sample was measured on
a MICROMERITICS ASPAP-2000 adsorption analy-
zer using nitrogen as adsorbate. Powder X-ray diffrac-
tion analysis was performed with Ni-filtered CuKa
radiation with Shimadzu XD-3A X-ray diffractometer.
The working voltage of 35 kV and the electronic current
of 25 mA were employed. The morphology of the as-
synthesized samples was observed by transmission
electron microscopy on JEM-100CX.
molar ratio of KBH4 to MoO3 is 2:1, boron is not
detected in sample 1 and the content of C and Mo in
sample 1 is 1.43%, 98.57%. When the molar ratio of
KBH4 to MoO3 is 3:1, boron is detected in sample 2,
and the contents of C, B, Mo in sample 2 were 5.16%,
3.89%, and 90.95%. With further elevation of the molar
ratio of KBH4 to MoO3, the content of C in the sample
decreases gradually, and the content of B increases.
When the molar ratio of KBH4 to MoO3 is 4:1, the
product contains larger content of boron (7.43%) and
smaller content of carbon (1.65%). As the molar ratio of
KBH4 to MoO3 reaches 6:1, the content of B in sample 8
increases to 10.53%, and C could not be detected. As the
molar ratio of MoO3 to KBH4 is 5:1, the elevation of the
molar ratio of CCl4 to KBH4 from 0.52 to 1.27 leads to
the increasing of the content of C from 1.24% to 1.48%
and the decreasing of the content of B from 10.50% to
8.32% in the product.
Fig. 1 presents the patterns of XRD of as-synthesized
samples prepared under the condition of different molar
ratio of KBH4 to MoO3. It can be seen that the product
is a mixture of Mo2C and Mo when the molar ratio of
KBH4 to MoO3 is 2:1. When the molar ratio of KBH4 to
MoO3 increases to 3:1, molybdenum boride (MoB) with
tetragonal crystalline structure appears in the product
and the product is a mixture of Mo2C, Mo2B, and MoB.
When the molar ratio of KBH4 to MoO3 is 3.5:1, the
phase of Mo2B disappears, and the product comprises
of Mo2C and MoB. With the elevation of the molar
ratio of KBH4 to MoO3, the content of Mo2C decreases
gradually. As the molar ratio of KBH4 to MoO3 is 4:1,
the phase of MoB2 appears, and the product mainly
comprises of MoB with a small amount of Mo, Mo2C,
and MoB2. As the molar ratio of KBH4 to MoO3
reaches 5:1, the product is composed of Mo, MoB, and
MoB2 with only a small amount of Mo2C. Meanwhile, it
can also be seen that the as-synthesized sample is poorly
crystalline when the molar ratio of KBH4 to MoO3 is
above 4:1.
3. Results and discussion
The detailed preparation conditions and properties
are presented in Table 1. It can be seen that when the
In order to further determine the phase composition
of the as-synthesized samples prepared under the
Table 1
The properties of the products synthesized under the different conditions
No. Molar ratio
Content (wt%)
Average crystal size by XRD (nm)
Surface area (m2 gꢀ1
)
KBH4 and MoO3 CCl4 and KBH4 Mo
B
C
Mo
MoB2
Mo2C
MoB2
Mo2B
129.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2
1.43
1.43
0.52
0.52
1.27
0.52
0
98.57
90.95
91.44
90.31
90.20
88.26
97.46
89.46
0
1.43
3.89
2.72
1.65
1.48
1.24
0
111.7
111.3
87.9
45.1
27.4
43.8
43.8
1.6
7.8
3
5.16
5.84
58.1
19.4
15.9
15.3
8
3.5
4
29.1
35.1
17.4
33.1
37.1
27.6
8.04
8.32
12
12.4
14.9
12.1
5
15.2
25
5
10.50
2.56
10.54
5
9.7
12.4
6
0.52
0
9.8
10.7
The average crystal sizes of Mo, Mo2C, MoB, MoB2, and Mo2B are determined from the broadening of corresponding X-ray spectral peaks (at 40.51,
39.51, 42.51, 45.31, and 40.991, respectively) by Scherrer formula: L ¼ 0:89l=b cos y: