JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS
3
6
1.63–56.00 (OCH ) . UV-Vis. (k max/nm): 210, 220, 232, 249, 1640) at the concentrations of 100, 200, 300, 400, and
3 3
2
66, 274, 282, 295, 302, 360.
500 mM were added to each well, and then the cells were
again left for incubation for 24 h in an environment contain-
ꢂ
ing 5% CO at 37 C. The same concentrations were used for
2
2.2. Synthesis of nickel and palladium complexes
all samples in the MTT tests. Only 100 mL of medium (RPMI-
1
640) was added to the cells in the control wells (Aktas¸
In a 100 mL round bottom flask, the Schiff base ligand
et al., 2018; Sarı et al., 2020; Tan et al., 2020).
(
0.40 g, 1.38 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (20 mL). A
solution of NiCl ꢀ6H O and PdCl (CH CN) (0.33 g, 1.38 mmol
2
2
2
3
2
and 0.35 g, 1.38 mmol) in 20 mL of methanol was added to
the mixture, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h. The
completion of the complexing reaction was checked by TLC
and then let it be cool. The precipitate formed was filtrated.
2
.3.3. Determining the optimum electroporation conditions
It is of prime importance to monitor the permeability of the
cells before proceeding to the electroporation application
(Emam et al., 2019). In this study, propidium iodide (PI) was
The product was washed with diethyl ether and dried.
used to determine the cell electropermeabilization. 10 mL PI
and 90 mL cell suspension (1 ꢃ 10 cell/mL) were added to
ꢂ
[
NiCl L(H O)]ꢀ2H O: Green solid, yield 72%, m.p.: >270 C.
6
2
2
2
meff (B.M.): 2.78. Anal. calc. for C H N O NiCl (FW: 472.82 g/
14
21
3
7
2
the 4 mm EP cuvettes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and then
the cuvettes were placed in the EP device for the electrical
pulse application. 8 square-wave pulse trains having various
electric field strengths (375, 625, 875, 1125, and 1250 V/cm)
with a duration of 100 ms and a frequency of 1 Hz were
applied to the cell suspensions in order to determine the
optimum electroporation conditions for the HepG2 cells to
be used in the study. The control cells were also placed in
the cuvettes under the same conditions, but the electric field
was not applied to them. Following the EP, the cells were incu-
bated with PI for 15min at room temperature and then the
percentage of permeabilized cells was measured using the flow
cytometry (Becton-Dickinson). At least 10,000 cells were meas-
ured from each sample. The percentage of stained cells was
found by making a comparison with the non-electroporated
control cells. The electropermeabilization alone is not sufficient
to determine the most appropriate electric field to be used in
ECT. In addition to the best permeability, it is also important to
determine the voltage causing the least cell death. For this pur-
mol): C; 35.53, H; 4.44, N; 8.88. Found: C; 35.60, H; 4.56, N;
ꢁ
1
8
.94. FT-IR (KBr, v max (cm )): 3320 (OH), 3176 (NH), 3097
(
(
5
2
4
Ar–CH), 2982 (Al–CH), 1730 (C ¼ O), 1656 (CH ¼ N), 1636
C ¼ N), 1566, 1501, 1446 (C ¼ C)Ar, 1094 (OCH ), 800 (H O),
3
2
99, 546, 529 (M–O), 461 (M–N). UV–Vis. (k max/nm): 219,
27, 237, 249, 278, 287, 357, 369, 484, 516. MS [ESI]: m/z
þ
73.82 (Calc.), 473.39 (Found) [M þ H] .
[
PdL(H O)]ꢀ0.5H OꢀCl : Cream solid, yield 74%, m.p.:
2
2
2
ꢂ
270 C. m (B.M.): Dia, Anal. calc. for C H N O5.5PdCl2
eff 14 18 3
>
(
FW: 493.32 g/mol): C; 34.05, H; 3.64, N; 8.51. Found: C; 34.15,
ꢁ1
H; 3.60, N; 8.54. FT-IR (KBr, v max (cm )): 3424, 3310 (OH),
3
178 (NH), 3096 (Ar–CH), 2886 (Al–CH), 1717 (C ¼ O), 1670
(
(
CH ¼ N), 1633 (C ¼ N), 1534, 1503, 1473 (C ¼ C) , 1120
Ar
1
OCH ), 885 (H O), 579, 525 (M–O), 451 (M–N). H-NMR (300
3
2
Mz, DMSO-d ): d (ppm) ¼ 8.10 (s, H, NH), 8.32 (s, H, N ¼ CH),
6
13
7
.85–6.39 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 3.80–3.45 (s, 9H, OCH ). C-NMR
3
(
1
100 MHz, DMSO-d , ppm): 163.50 (CH ¼ N), 159.28 (C ¼ N),
6
53.43 (C ¼ O), 151.18–103.03 (Ar-C), 61.90–52.18 (OCH ) .
3
3
UV–Vis. (k max/nm): 219, 228, 235, 249, 256, 275, 387, 426.
MS [ESI]: m/z 494.32 (Calc.), 494.96 (Found) [M þ H] .
6
pose, 400 mL cell suspension (1ꢃ 10 cell/mL) were placed in
þ
the 4 mm EP cuvettes without adding any agent or PI, and
then the same voltages as in the electropermeabilization were
applied. The HepG2 cells were examined in terms of both
short-term (20-minute incubation after EP) and long-term (24 h
incubation after EP) cell viability. The electroporation parame-
2.3. Antiproliferative activity
2
.3.1. Cell culture experiments
The HepG2 and L-929 cells were used as models in the cell ters were optimized for high permeability and low cellular mor-
culture experiments. The development of the cells was exam- tality based on the MTT and PI analyses.
ined under an inverted microscope daily. The cells were fed
with the RPMI-1640 medium which was prepared by adding
2
2.3.4. Electrochemotherapy (ECT)
When the HepG2 cells incubated to be used in the study
reached a confluency of 80–90%, they were removed using
1
0% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in 25 cm culture
flasks. The cells were incubated in a 5% CO incubator at a
2
ꢂ
temperature of 37 C and a humidity of 95%.
1
X Trypsin-EDTA, and then the cell solution was transferred
into falcon tubes and sedimented by centrifugation at
2
.3.2. Chemotherapy
1000 rpm for 5 min. 400 mL cell suspension at a density of
6
The cells were counted using a cell counting device, and the 1 ꢃ 10 cell/mL was transferred to the 4 mm EP cuvettes in a
viability was measured using the Trypan Blue Solution way that the concentration of each compound was at
(
0.4%). The experiments were not started in case the viability 200 mM. The cuvettes were placed in the Gene Pulser Xcell
TM
rate was below 90%. In the experiments, the cells were
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for the electric field applica-
4
seeded in the 96-well plates at a density of 1 ꢃ 10 cells per tion. Eight square-wave pulse trains having a strength of
well. The seeded cells were incubated for 24 h in an environ- 1125 V/cm with a duration of 100 ms and a frequency of
ꢂ
ment containing 5% CO at 37 C. After the medium liquids 1 Hz, which correspond to the parameters used in ECT clin-
2
were removed from the incubated cells, 100 mL of the syn- ical practice (Campana et al., 2019), were applied to the cell
thesized substance solutions prepared in medium (RPMI- suspensions. Likewise, the control cells were placed in the