Y. Bando et al. / Electrochimica Acta 53 (2007) 87–91
91
Table 2
2−
Comparison of the reduction current peaks of PdCl4 in the cyclic voltammo-
grams of some RTILs.
Ionic liquid
Electrode
Reduction potential
(V) vs. Fc/Fc+
Reference
BMPTFSI
EMI–Cl–BF4
AlCl3–EMIC (neutral)
Pt
GC
Pd
−1.4
−1.2
−1.5
This work
[4]
[3]
close to those of the two other RTIL, suggesting that the outer
sphere effect on the redox potential of these complexes is not
so significant in these media.
Fig. 11. Cyclic voltammograms of a Pt electrode in BMPTFSI containing
10 mM PdCl42− (—) and 10 mM PdBr42− (- - - -) at 25 ◦C. Scan rate: 50 mV s−1
4. Conclusions
.
PdBr2 and PdCl2 dissolved in BMPTFSI as square planer
complexes and gave red and orange-yellow solutions, respec-
tively. The cathodic current peak attributed to the reduction
of Pd(II) to Pd(0) was observed in the cyclic voltammogram
electrode surface is classified into instantaneous and progressive
nucleation process. The relationship between jm and tm is given
by the following equation for each nucleation process:
2−
for PdBr42−/BMPTFSI. The electrode reaction of PdBr4 to
jm2 tm = 0.1629(nFC)2D (instantaneous)
jm2 tm = 0.2598(nFC)2D (progressive)
(4)
(5)
metallic Pd was irreversible and the diffusion coefficient of
2−
PdBr4 was about (1–2) × 10−7 cm2 s−1 at 25 ◦C. It was sug-
gested that the initial stage of the electrodeposition of Pd from
PdBr42−/BMPTFSI on the polycrystalline Pt electrode surface
involves three-dimensional progressive nucleation under diffu-
sion control. The morphology of the deposits obtained by the
galvanostatic electrodeposition depended on the current density.
In addition, PdCl42− showed a similar electrochemical behavior
It is apparent from the comparison of the data obtained in this
study with the simulated curves in Fig. 9 that the initial stage of
Pd deposition on the polycrystalline Pt electrode can be regard
as the progressive nucleation. Furthermore, using the equation
for the progressive nucleation shown above, the diffusion coef-
ficient is calculated to be 1.6 × 10−7 cm s−1, which is close to
that estimated by the chronopotentiometry.
2−
as PdBr4 in BMPTFSI, while the reduction potential shifted
negatively by 0.2 V.
Galvanostatic electrodeposition of Pd on a Ni substrate was
also carried out at various current densities. Fig. 10 shows the
SEM images of the deposits. Black and powdery deposits were
obtained at higher current densities (Fig. 10a). However, smooth
deposits with brightness could be obtained at lower current den-
sities (Fig. 10c). The further investigation on controlling the
morphologies of the deposit is under way.
Acknowledgements
The present work was financially supported by Grant-in-
Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas of “Science of
Ionic Liquids” (No. 17073016) from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan (MEXT). This
work was also supported by Grant-in-Aid for the 21st Century
COE program “KEIO Life Conjugate Chemistry” from MEXT.
PdCl2 is commonly used for industrial Pd electroplating
2−
measurements on the PdCl4 in other RTILs were performed
References
and reported previously. Therefore, it would be meaningful to
examine the electrochemical behavior of PdCl42− and compare
it with that of PdBr42−. Fig. 11 shows the cyclic voltammo-
[1] H. Ohno (Ed.), Electrochemical Aspects of Ionic Liquids, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
[2] I.-W. Sun, C.L. Hussey, J. Electroanal. Chem. 274 (1989) 325.
[3] H.C. De Long, J.S. Wilkes, R.T. Carlin, J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (1994)
1000.
[4] H.-Y. Hsu, C.-C. Yang, Z. Naturforsch. 58b (2003) 1055.
[5] F.-Y. Su, J.-F. Huang, I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 (2004) 811.
[6] D.R. MacFarlane, J. Sun, J. Golding, P. Meakin, M. Forsyth, Electrochim.
Acta 45 (2000) 1271.
[7] R.M. Rush, D.S. Martin Jr., R.G. LeGrand, Inorg. Chem. 14 (1975) 2543.
[8] A.J. McCaffery, P.N. Schatz, P.J. Stephens, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968)
5730.
[9] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and
Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2001.
[10] M. Yamagata, N. Tachikawa, Y. Katayama, T. Miura, Electrochim. Acta 50
(2007) 3317.
[11] B. Scharifker, G. Hills, Electrochim. Acta 28 (1983) 879.
[12] J. Fuller, R.T. Carlin, R.A. Osteryoung, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (1997)
3881.
gram of the Pt electrode in 10 mM PdCl42−/BMPTFSI. The
2−
reduction peak of PdCl4
appeared at −1.8 V, which was
2−
more negative than that for PdBr4 by about 0.2 V as shown
in Fig. 1. The deposition of metallic Pd was also possible
from PdCl42−/BMPTFSI. The shift in the peak potential can
be attributed to the difference in donor property of the ligand.
Since the donor number of Cl− is larger than that of Br−,
the chlorocomplex is expected be more stabilized than the
complexes in other RTILs are listed in Table 2 [3,5]. All the
peak potentials are obtained from the cyclic voltammograms at
scan rate of 100 mV s−1, and referred to Fc/Fc+ redox potential
in each media for comparison [12]. As shown in this table,
2−
the reduction potential of PdCl4
in BMPTFSI was very