Preparation of Well-Dispersed Pt Nanoparticles on CNTs
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 109, No. 47, 2005 22215
to the reverse current peak (Ib), If/Ib, is an index of the catalyst
tolerance to the poisoning species, PtdCdO. A higher ratio
indicates more effective removal of the poisoning species on
the catalyst surface. The If/Ib ratio of Pt/CNT composite is 0.88,
higher than that of the E-TEK catalyst (0.74), showing better
catalyst tolerance of the Pt/CNT composite.
Conclusions
In summary, a novel method has been successfully developed
to load Pt nanoparticles on CNTs without pretreating the CNTs.
It is unique in the system that the PPh3 offers strong adhesion
of Pt on CNT surface and sufficient protection for Pt nanopar-
ticles from being aggregated. Pt/CNT composite with different
Pt content was conveniently controlled by manipulating the
relative concentration of CNTs vs Pt nanoparticles. Pt nano-
particles highly dispersed on CNTs kept their initial small sizes
in solution. Even though thermal treatment led to some extent
of aggregation of Pt nanoprticles, the sizes of most Pt nano-
particles are still smaller than 4 nm. The produced Pt/CNT
composite shows higher electrocatalytic activities and catalyst
tolerance that can be applied in DMFCs in comparison with
the E-TEK catalyst. The present technique represents a highly
feasible approach to produce Pt/CNT composite, which should
have great potential in DMFC applications.
Figure 5. XRD pattern of Pt/CNT composite shown in Figure 4a.
Acknowledgment. Financial support from National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Nos. 20520140277, 20121301,
and 20575070), National Key Project on Basic Research (Grant
No. G2000077501), and Chinese Academy of Sciences is
gratefully acknowledged.
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of methanol oxidation on Pt/CNT
composite (solid line) and commercial E-TEK Pt/C catalyst (dash line)
-
1
in 2 M CH
temperature.
3 2 4
OH/1 M H SO electrolyte at 20 mV S at room
References and Notes
(
(
(
1) Olah, G. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2.
2) Winter, M.; Brodd, R. J. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 4245.
3) Mcnicol, B. D.; Rand, D. A. J.; Williams, K. R. J. Power Sources
spectrum (Figure 5) of Pt/CNT composite after thermal treatment
shown in Figure 3a. The peak at 2θ ) 26.5° corresponds to the
(
4
002) planes of graphitized CNTs. And the peaks at 2θ ) 39.7°,
1999, 83, 15.
(4) Lamy, C.; L e´ ger, J. M.; Srinivasan, S. Mod. Aspects Electrochem.
6.2°, 67.4°, and 81.2° can be assigned to the (111), (200), (220),
2
001, 34, 73.
and (311) crystalline planes of fcc Pt, respectively, which
indicates that the Pt nanoparticles are composed of pure
crystalline Pt.
(5) Matsumoto, T.; Komatsu, T.; Arai, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Kijima, M.;
Shimizu, H.; Takasawa, Y.; Nakamura, J. Chem. Commun. 2004, 840.
(6) Yu, J. S.; Kanf, S.; Yoon, S. B.; Chai, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
24, 9382.
1
The electrochemical performance of the Pt/CNT composite
(
(
7) Chen, W. X.; Lee, J. Y.; Liu, Z. L. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2588
8) Liang, H. P.; Zhang, H. M.; Hu, J. S.; Guo, Y. G.; Wan, L. J.; Bai,
(24 wt %, shown in Figure 3a) was tested for methanol
oxidation, which is at the heart of DMFC application in the
anodic half-cell reaction. For comparison, the commercial Pt
catalyst (E-TEK, 20 wt %) was also employed. In Figure 6, the
cyclic voltammograms for methanol oxidation at Pt/CNT
composite prepared by our method (solid line) and the com-
mercial catalyst (dash line) are compared. The voltammetric
C. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1540
(9) Anderson, M. L.; Stroud, R. M.; Rolison, D. R. Nano Lett. 2002,
2, 235.
10) Vinodgopal, K.; Haria, M.; Meisel, D.; Kamat, P. Nano Lett. 2004,
, 415.
11) Schmidt, T. J.; Paulus, U. A.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Behm, R. J. J.
Electroanal. Chem. 2001, 508, 41.
(12) Bock, C.; Paquet, C.; Couillard, M.; Botton, G. A.; MacDougall,
B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8028.
13) Liu, Z.; Ling, X. Y.; Su, X.; Lee, J. Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004,
08, 8234.
14) Ebbesen, T. W.; Lezec, H. J.; Hiura, H.; Bennett, J. W.; Ghaemi,
H. F.; Thio, T. Nature 1996, 382, 54.
(15) Baughman, R. H.; Zakhidov, A. A.; Heer, W. A. Science 2002,
(
4
(
6-8,18
features are in good agreement with literature,
in which
the typical methanol oxidation current peak on Pt catalyst is at
about 0.74 V vs SCE in the forward scan. Figure 6 clearly shows
that the oxidation current observed with Pt/CNT composite is
considerably higher than that of the E-TEK catalyst. This
significant improvement in the catalytic performance can be
attributed to the high level of dispersion of Pt nanoparticles on
CNTs. In the reverse scan, an oxidation peak is observed around
(
1
(
2
97, 787.
(
16) Lee, K. M.; Li, L. C.; Dai, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
122.
(17) Rajesh, B.; Thampi, K. R.; Bonard, J. M.; Xanthopoulos, N.;
Mathieu, H. J.; Viswanathan, B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 2701.
18) Guo, D. J.; Li, H. L. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 573, 197.
19) Tang, H.; Chen, J. H.; Huang, Z. P.; Wang, D. Z.; Rn, Z. F.; Nie,
L. H.; Kuang, Y. F.; Yao, S. Z. Carbon 2004, 42, 191.
20) Ang, L. M.; Andy Hor, T. S.; Xu, G. Q.; Tung, C. H.; Zhao, S.;
Wang, J. L. S. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 2115.
21) Yu, R. Q.; Chen, L. W.; Liu, Q. P.; Lin, J. Y.; Tan, K. L.; Ng, S.
4
0
.53 V, which is primarily associated with the removal of the
4,13,32,33
residual carbon species formed in the forward scan.
The
(
(
residual carbon species are oxidized according to the following
reaction:
(
+
-
PtOH + PtdCdO f CO + 2Pt + H + e
ad
2
(
C.; Chan, H. S. O.; Xu, G. Q.; Andy Hor, T. S. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10,
718.
Therefore, the ratio of the forward oxidation current peak (If)