2
26
L. Chen et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 351 (2011) 217–227
to methane in the presence of H2 at high temperature. Accord-
ingly, we think that the acyl is a key intermediate for the C
References
O
[
[
1] C.H. Christensen, J. Rass-Hansen, C.C. Marsden, E. Taarning, K. Egeblad, Chem-
SusChem 1 (2008) 283–289.
2] J.H. Clark, F.E.I. Deswarte, T.J. Farmer, Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 3 (2009) 72–90.
hydrogenation and C–C bond cleavage of carboxylic acid func-
tional group. The hydrodeoxygenation mechanism of carboxylic
acid over the supported Ru catalyst is proposed in Scheme 1. The
carboxylic acid molecule dissociates to form the acyl surface species
directly or via carboxylate intermediate over Ru metal firstly. Con-
sequently, one pathway is that the acyl intermediate is catalyzed
by Ru metal to produce adsorbed CO plus hydrocarbon moieties
after the  C–H bond activation of the acyl. Finally, the methane
[3] Y.C. Lin, G.W. Huber, Energy Environ. Sci. 2 (2009) 68–80.
[
4] G. Centi, R.A. van, Santen (Eds.), Catalysis for Renewables, Wiley-VCH, Wein-
heim, Germany, 2007, p. 53.
[
5] J.J. Bozell, G.R. Petersen, Green Chem. 12 (2010) 539–554.
[6] Z.G. Zhang, J.E. Jackson, D.J. Miller, Appl. Catal. A 219 (2001) 89–98.
[
[
[
7] Z.G. Zhang, J.E. Jackson, D.J. Miller, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41 (2002) 691–696.
8] J.N. Chheda, J.A. Dumesic, Catal. Today 123 (2007) 59–70.
9] J.C. Serrano-Ruiz, J.A. Dumesic, Green Chem. 11 (2009) 1101–1104.
and C
-alkane are produced by hydrogenation of adsorbed CO
[10] J.C. Serrano-Ruiz, J.A. Dumesic, ChemSusChem 2 (2009) 581–586.
[11] R.M. West, M.H. Tucker, D.J. Braden, J.A. Dumesic, Catal. Commun. 10 (2009)
n−1
and hydrocarbon moieties on Ru metal. Another pathway is that
the acyl intermediate is hydrogenated to alcohol via formation
of aldehyde intermediate. In addition, a fast equilibrium reaction
may be existed between the acyl species and the adsorbed alco-
hol/aldehyde species. This equilibrium reaction will lead to the
C–C bond cleavage of the alcohol/aldehyde. Furthermore, the pro-
duced alcohol from carboxylic acid can be further hydrogenated
to corresponding alkane. This was reported for alcohols converted
into corresponding alkane via dehydration-hydrogenation over the
acid/metal bifunctional catalysts [8,11,22].
1
743–1746.
12] Z.G. Zhang, J.E. Jackson, D.J. Miller, Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008)
873–5880.
[13] Y.Q. Chen, D.J. Miller, J.E. Jackson, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007)
334–3340.
14] C. Delhomme, D. Weuster-Botz, F.E. Kühn, Green Chem. 11 (2009) 13–26.
[
5
3
[
[
15] J.N. Chheda, Y. Román-Leshkov, J.A. Dumesic, Green Chem.
342–350.
9 (2007)
[16] J.C. Serrano-Ruiz, D. Wang, J.A. Dumesic, Green Chem. 12 (2010) 574–577.
[17] H. Olcay, L. Xu, Y. Xu, G.W. Huber, ChemCatChem 2 (2010) 1420–1424.
[18] N. Li, G.W. Huber, J. Catal. 270 (2010) 48–59.
[19] A. Wawrzetz, B. Peng, A. Hrabar, A. Jentys, A.A. Lemonidou, J.A. Lercher, J. Catal.
69 (2010) 411–420.
20] G.W. Huber, J.N. Chheda, C.J. Barrett, J.A. Dumesic, Science 308 (2005)
446–1450.
[21] J.C. Serrano-Ruiz, J.A. Dumesic, Energy Environ. Sci. 4 (2011) 83–99.
2
[
1
3.5. Effect of support on reaction of C–C bond cleavage
[22] G.W. Huber, J.A. Dumesic, Catal. Today 111 (2006) 119–132.
[23] F.T. Jere, D.J. Miller, J.E. Jackson, Org. Lett. 5 (2003) 527–530.
[24] G.W. Huber, J.A. Dumesic, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 1549–1551.
[25] G.W. Huber, P. O’Connor, A. Corma, Appl. Catal. A 329 (2007) 120–129.
The reaction kinetics data and DRIFTS characterization results
reveal that the C–C bond cleavage via decarbonylation of the acyl
is greatly inhibited over the Ru/Al O3 catalyst compared to the
Ru/ZrO2 (or Ru/C) catalyst. The inhibition ability of C–C bond
[26] J.N. Chheda, G.W. Huber, J.A. Dumesic, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007)
164–7183.
27] T.P. Vispute, G.W. Huber, Green Chem. 11 (2009) 1433–1445.
[28] G.W. Huber, S. Iborra, A. Corma, Chem. Rev. 106 (2006) 4044–4098.
[29] A. Corma, S. Iborra, A. Velty, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 2411–2502.
2
7
[
cleavage increases in the follow order: Ru/C < Ru/ZrO < Ru/Al O .
2
2
3
Based on the characterizations of catalysts (H -TPR, NH -TPD,
2
3
[
[
30] R. Luque, J.H. Clark, K. Yoshida, P.L. Gai, Chem. Commun. (2009) 5305–5307.
31] R. Luque, J.H. Clark, Catal. Commun. 11 (2010) 928–931.
CO-FTIR), the metal–support interaction and surface acidity of cata-
lysts increases in the following order: Ru/C < Ru/ZrO < Ru/Al O . In
2
2
3
[32] T. Miyazawa, S. Koso, K. Kunimori, K. Tomishige, Appl. Catal. A 329 (2007)
30–35.
addition, the CO-FTIR reveals that the electronic state of Ru species
on the Ru/Al O catalyst is electron deficient compared with those
[
[
33] E.P. Maris, R.J. Davis, J. Catal. 249 (2007) 328–337.
34] E.S. Vasiliadou, E. Heracleous, I.A. Vasalos, A.A. Lemonidou, Appl. Catal. B 92
2
3
of Ru/ZrO catalyst. Therefore, it is possible that the effect of support
2
(
2009) 90–99.
[35] T. Miyazawa, Y. Kusunoki, K. Kunimori, K. Tomishige, J. Catal. 240 (2006)
13–221.
36] H. Kobayashi, T. Komanoya, K. Hara, A. Fukuoka, ChemSusChem 3 (2010)
40–443.
on the reaction route for APHDO of carboxylic acids is attributed to
these factors of catalyst, i.e., surface acidity, metal–support interac-
2
[
tion and electronic state of Ru species. The stronger metal–support
4
n+
interaction, the more electron deficient ruthenium species (Ru
)
[37] J.H. Zhou, M.G. Zhang, L. Zhao, P. Li, X.G. Zhou, W.K. Yuan, Catal. Today 147
(2009) S225–S229.
and the more acidity sites on the catalyst will lead to the higher
extent of C O hydrogenation or lower extent of C–C bond cleavage.
[
[
38] M. Kantcheva, S. Sayan, Catal. Lett. 60 (1999) 27–38.
39] S. Hosokawa, H. Kanai, K. Utani, Y. Taniguchi, Y. Saito, S. Imamura, Appl. Catal.
B 45 (2003) 181–187.
[
[
40] R. Lanza, S.G. Järås, P. Canu, Appl. Catal. A 325 (2007) 57–67.
41] P. Betancourt, A. Rives, R. Hubaut, C.E. Scott, J. Goldwasser, Appl. Catal. A 170
4
. Conclusions
(
1998) 307–314.
[
42] I. Rossetti, N. Pernicone, L. Forni, Appl. Catal. A 248 (2003) 97–103.
For carboxylic acid APHDO over the Ru/C, Ru/ZrO and Ru/Al O
3
[43] J.L. Bi, Y.Y. Hong, C.C. Lee, C.T. Yeh, C.B. Wang, Catal. Today 129 (2007)
22–329.
44] H. Ishikawa, J.N. Kondo, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem.
229–3234.
[45] M.G. Cattania, F. Parmigiani, V. Ragaini, Surf. Sci. 211/212 (1989)
097–1105.
46] K. Asakura, Y. Iwasawa, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 86 (1990)
657–2662.
[47] M.W. McQuire, C.H. Rochester, J. Catal. 157 (1995) 396–402.
2
2
3
catalysts, the high temperature, as well as, the catalysts with high
Ru loading Ru loading facilitated the cleavage of C–C bond, while
acidic support in combination with a metal favored the hydro-
genation of carboxyl. The DRIFTS results revealed that the C–C
bond cleavage was induced by the decarbonylation of acyl on
the catalyst. The C–C bond cleavage was favored in the order
of Ru/C > Ru/ZrO > Ru/Al O . Based on H -TPR, NH -TPD and CO-
[
B 103 (1999)
3
1
[
2
[48] G.H. Yokomizo, C. Louis, A.T. Bell, J. Catal. 120 (1989) 1–14.
[49] S.Y. Chin, C.T. Williams, M.D. Amiridis, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 871–882.
[50] B.A. Riguetto, J.M.C. Bueno, L. Petrov, C.M.P. Marques, Spectrochim. Acta Part
A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 59 (2003) 2141–2150.
2
2
3
2
3
FTIR, the effect of support on the reaction routes may be attributed
to surface acidity, electronic state of Ru species and metal–support
interaction of catalyst.
[51] C. Elmasides, D.I. Kondarides, W. Grünert, X.E. Verykios, J. Phys. Chem. B 103
1999) 5227–5239.
(
[
52] V. Mazzieri, F. Coloma-Pascual, A. Arcoya, P.C. L’Argentière, N.S. F’goli, Appl.
Surf. Sci. 210 (2003) 222–230.
Acknowledgements
[53] T. Mitsui, K. Tsutsui, T. Matsui, R. Kikuchi, K. Eguchi, Appl. Catal. B 81 (2008)
6–63.
5
[
[
54] A.R. Garcia, J.L. da Silva, L.M. Ilharco, Surf. Sci. 415 (1998) 183–193.
55] W. Rachmady, M.A. Vannice, J. Catal. 207 (2002) 317–330.
The authors gratefully thank the financial supports of Major
State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program)
[56] M.K. Gnanamani, G. Jacobs, R.A. Keogh, B.H. Davis, J. Catal. 277 (2010)
7–35.
[
2
(
No. 2012CB215305) and Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
0976185). We also thank Dr. Guoqiang Ding for valuable discus-
sion during manuscript preparation.
57] J.L. Davis, M.A. Barteau, Surf. Sci. 235 (1990) 235–248.
58] A. Yee, S.J. Morrison, H. Idriss, J. Catal. 191 (2000) 30–45.
2
[
[59] M. Heinen, Z. Jusys, R.J. Behm, J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (2010) 9850–9864.