Communications
This complicated process involves both a crystallization
preparation of the starting solutions. The solvents used were distilled
under sodium and degassed through three freeze-pump-thaw cycles.
The long-chain amines were purchased from Fluka. The hydrochloric
salts were prepared by addition of an excess of a 2m solution of HCl in
diethyl ether to a solution of the corresponding amine in toluene. The
precipitate which formed immediately was stirred for 2 h,then
washed with toluene. Complete evaporation of the solvent gave the
hydrochloride salt.
and a size adjustment of the particles. We studied the
influence of several reaction parameters to gain some knowl-
edge of the formation of these objects. We found that the
[
20]
concentration of the reagents,the use of [{Sn(NMe )Cl} ] as
2
2
the chloride source,the addition of free HNMe ,the nature of
2
the solvent and the presence of water in it,as well as the
reaction time are some of the parameters that determine the
outcome of the crystallization. Conditions have thus been
identified which favor the production of NCS 1 almost
exclusively,and other conditions where both NCSs were
produced (see Experimental Section). We also found that the
formation of NCSs does not proceed in THF or if the toluene
reaction solution is stirred. In the latter case,a high degree of
size polydispersity and almost no organization are observed.
Finally,the reaction and organization proceed using dodecyl-
amine (DDA) in place of HDA and with similar constraints
on concentration,but not when octylamine was used.
[{Sn(NMe
)Cl} ] was prepared in a similar way to [{Sn(NMe ) } ]
2
2
2
2
2
but by adding only one equivalent of LiNMe2 to SnCl ,and was
2
isolated by sublimation at 1108C. The product was characterized by
1
X-ray crystal-structure analysis (not reported here); H NMR: d =
3
2
.32 ppm ( J
= 26.7 Hz).
Sn-H
Typical procedures leading to NCS 1:
A
solution of
[{Sn(NMe ) } ] (51.7 mg,0.250 mmol of Sn) in freshly distilled and
2
2 2
degassed toluene (the distilled toluene contains about 50 ppm of
H O) was added to a suspension of a mixture of HDA·HCl (26.1 mg,
2
0.094 mmol) and HDA (8.5 mg,0.035 mmol) in the same solvent. The
total volume was adjusted to 5.5 mL. Alternatively,a mixture of
[
{Sn(NMe ) } ]/[{Sn(NMe )Cl} ]
(36.7 mg,0.177 mmol/14.5 mg,
2
2
2
2
2
0.073 mmol) could be used. In this case HDA was the only amine
A rational for these observations can be proposed. In the
absence of stirring,a gradient of metal and ligand concen-
trations may form between the layers directly exposed to UV
light and the inner parts of the solution,thus accounting for
the presence of particles of different sizes and shapes in the
reaction mixture. The particles formed may also fluctuate in
used and the two Sn precursors left to react for a few minutes before
adding the reaction mixture to HDA (30.2 mg,0.125 mmol). The total
amount of toluene used ws 5.5 mL. Monitoring of the reaction
1
between [{SnCl(NMe ) ] and [{Sn(NMe ) } ] by H NMR spectro-
2
2
2 2 2
scopy showed that a tin complex identified as [{Sn Cl(NMe ) }] is
2
2 3
formed. The latter complex was detected as one of the products of the
reaction of HDA·HCl with [{SnCl(NMe )} ]. In both cases,the
2
2
[
21]
size and shape in solution as previously observed. Some
particles of a given size and ligand environment may self-
assemble into NCSs in solution as a result of size-dependent,
attractive interparticle forces.[ While growing,the resulting
NCSs will precipitate in toluene but may continue to
incorporate adequate particles present in the liquid phase.
The continuous formation of particles of size appropriate for
inclusion into the growing NCS results from size re-equili-
bration in solution. It is noteworthy that this process does not
operate in a polar solvent,such as THF,which may firmly
bind to the tin surface and hence may prevent re-equilibra-
tion. The presence of two types of networks results from the
necessity to accommodate particles of different shapes and
may be related to the concentration of chloride ions.
resulting clear yellow solution was stirred and then left standing for
h before exposure to UV light for 30 h and 46 h,respectively,
1
without stirring. The whole cell was then transferred into the glove-
box and a drop of the crude suspension obtained after removing the
majority of the clear yellow supernatant was placed on a TEM grid
and dried. The product for XRD measurements was isolated by
simple removal of the supernatant solution and drying. All efforts to
wash the powder resulted in loss of organization.
22]
Typical procedure leading to NCS 1 and NSC 2: The same general
procedure was used starting from a mixture of [{SnCl(NMe )} ]
2
2
(7.9 mg,0.040 mmol in Sn) and [{Sn(NMe ) } ] (42.5 mg,0.210 mmol
2 2 2
in Sn). The two compounds were reacted for 30 min in toluene (3 mL)
and then a solution of HDA (30.2 mg,0.125 mmol) in toluene
(2.5 mL) was added. The clear yellow solution was left without
stirring under UV light for 48 h and characterized as described above.
In conclusion,we have reported the synthesis of identical
tin nanoparticles included into tin superstructures of micron
sizes. The particles display uniform size and crystallographic
orientation. The noncompact nature of the superlattices
points towards a crystallization of both the particles and
their ligand shells,as for molecular species. The formation of
the NCSs results from 1) fractional crystallization in solution,
a long-known process that enables the spontaneous size
selection of particles,and 2) size fluctuation that affords new
particles to be incorporated into the NCSs. This in turn allows
the control in one step of the shape,monodispersity,and
ligand environment of the particles. This complex process has,
to the best of our knowledge,no precedent. Further work,
currently in progress,will be necessary to elucidate the
mechanism of growth of these NCSs and the generality of this
approach.
Received: November 6,2002 [Z50484]
Keywords: colloidal crystals · crystal growth · nanostructures ·
.
self-assembly · tin
[1] a) A. P. Alivisatos, Science 1996, 271,933; b) V. L. Colvin,M. C.
Schlamp,A. P. Alivisatos, Nature 1994, 370,354; c) C. T. Black,
C. B. Murray,R. L. Sandstrom,S. Sun, Science 2000, 290,1131;
d) S. Sun,C. B. Murray,D. Weller,L. Folks,A. Moser,
000, 287,1989.
Science
2
[
2] a) A. L. Rogach,E. V. Shevchenko,D. V. Talapin,A. Kornowski,
M. Haase,H. Weller, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2002, 12,653; b) C. B.
Murray,C. R. Kagan,M. G. Bawendi, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.
2000, 30,545; c) C. P. Collier,T. Vossmeyer,J. R. Heath, Annu.
Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998, 49,371.
[
3] M. Brust,M. Walker,D. Bethell,D. J. Schriffin,R. Whyman,
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994,801.
J.
[
4] a) S. A. Harfenist,Z. L. Wang,M. M. Alvarez,I. Vezmar,R. L.
Whetten, J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100,13904; b) Z. L. Wang,S. A.
Experimental Section
All noncommercial compounds were prepared under argon by using
Harfenist,R. L. Whetten,J. Bentley,N. D. Evans, J. Phys. Chem.
B 1998, 102,3068.
standard Schlenck techniques.
A glove-box was used for the
1
948
ꢀ 2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1945 – 1949