ence of excess hydrogen in the gas mixture passivates the
dangling bonds on the growing surface, and the impinging
species have more time to find favorable sites. This allows
for formation of more ordered structure. Excess hydrogen
also etches the growing surface, and in the extreme case of
heavy hydrogen dilution, strong etching eliminates part of
the disordered configurations.8 Since the crystalline phase is
the lowest energy configuration, it is often the surviving
structure. High dilution, therefore, favors the growth of mi-
crocrystalline material. The presence of microcrystalline re-
gions in large quantities affects the performance of the ma-
terial because of problems associated with grain boundaries.
The best material is obtained under the conditions just below
the threshold of microcrystalline growth. The research chal-
lenge will be to obtain conditions that will inhibit microcrys-
talline growth but will still promote the growth of the or-
dered regions. Other precursor gases could be useful. In fact,
we have been able to grow materials with similar ordered
regions using deuterated gases.
FIG. 3. High magnification bright-field TEM micrograph of ‘‘amorphous’’
matrix, sample US8013. Arrows show ordered linear-like objects.
In addition to creating conditions for the growth of a
more ordered material, hydrogen can also etch away weak or
strained bonds which will enhance stability. Although we see
a threefold increase in the volume fraction of the ordered
region as we go from the ‘‘standard’’ to the best quality
material, the fraction of the ordered region is still small. It is
possible that hydrogen dilution is causing other changes in
the structure or the bonding that are not detected by the
structural tools we have used.
In conclusion, we have shown that the volume fraction
of an ordered microstructure in a-Si alloy films increases
with increasing hydrogen dilution in the process gas mixture.
We suggest that the enhanced stability of solar cells prepared
with hydrogen dilution is caused by the improved micro-
structure.
structure, we also observe that the ‘‘amorphous’’ matrix is
not entirely featureless. In particular, as indicated by the ar-
rows, we find linearlike objects ͑i.e., one dimensional, hav-
ing widths 2–3 nm, and lengths up to a few 10’s of nm͒ that
appear to have some degree of order along their length.
These ‘‘linear’’ objects appear to meander throughout the
matrix in no particular direction. Similar linear objects are
also found in the rest of the samples, even in the standard
material! The ‘‘amorphous’’ matrix then consists of a hetero-
geneous mixture of a truly amorphous component, as de-
scribed by the short-range order of a continuous random net-
work ͑CRN͒, and objects that are intermediate in order
between the CRN and crystalline phases, i.e., the somewhat
ordered linear-like objects. It is this newly identified struc-
ture that we believe produces the 490 cmϪ1 band, and if so,
the results of the Raman deconvolution indicate that the vol-
ume fraction occupied by them within the ‘‘amorphous’’ ma-
trix increases with increasing H2 dilution.
The authors thank X. Xu and S. Sugiyama for discus-
sions, Dr. John Bradley at MVA, Inc. for TEM examina-
tions, and V. Trudeau for manuscript preparation.
The presence of the ordered linear-like regions and its
impact on stability merits some discussion. As the volume
fraction of these ordered regions grows, the quality of the
material improves as evidenced by the increased stability.
The best stability is obtained for the high hydrogen dilution
case where the volume fraction of these ordered regions is
the highest. It is interesting to point out that this material
actually includes a small amount of microcrystalline inclu-
sion, and effusion of hydrogen occurs more readily from this
material. Further increase in hydrogen dilution increases the
microcrystalline volume fraction further, and the solar cell
shows lower open-circuit voltage and fill factor characteristic
of microcrystalline solar cells.
1 For a recent review, see H. Fritzsche, Amorphous and Microcrystalline
Silicon Technology–1997, Materials Research Society Symposium Pro-
ceedings, 1997 ͑to be published͒.
2 S. Guha, K. L. Narasimhan, and S. M. Pietruszko, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 859
͑1981͒.
3 X. Xu, J. Yang, and S. Guha, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 198–200, 60 ͑1996͒.
4 D. L. Williamson, in Amorphous Silicon Technology–1995, Materials Re-
search Society Symposium Proceedings Vol. 377, edited by M. Hack, E.
A. Schiff, A. Madan, M. Powell, and A. Matsuda ͑Materials Research
Society, Pittsburgh, 1995͒, pp. 251–262.
5 S. Guha, Proc. 25th IEEE PVSC, 1017 ͑1996͒.
6 D. V. Tsu, B. Chao, S. R. Ovshinsky, S. Guha, and J. Yang ͑unpublished͒.
7 R. Tsu, S. S. Chao, M. Izu, S. R. Ovshinsky, G. J. Jan, and F. H. Pollack,
J. Phys. ͑France͒ C4, 269 ͑1981͒.
8 C. C. Tsai, in Amorphous Silicon and Related Materials, edited by H.
Fritzsche ͑World Scientific, Singapore, 1988͒, Vol. 1, p. 123.
What is the role of hydrogen? We believe that the pres-
Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 71, No. 10, 8 September 1997 Tsu et al. 1319
128.114.34.22 On: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:21:10