ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Tang et al. / Journal of Solid State Chemistry 180 (2007) 2871–2876
2872
layers. The resulted silver-coated silica nanoshells were
demonstrated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission
electron microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffrac-
tion (SAED), high-resolution transmission electron micro-
scopy (HRTEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX)
microanalysis. The reaction parameters such as the current
density (I), the concentration of electrolyte (C) and the
reaction time (t) for the formation of uniform silver layers
were studied. Optical properties of the composite particles
with different silver content were also investigated.
analyzed by EDX, SAED and HRTEM, which were also
performed with the same microscope. The UV–visible
absorption spectroscopy was carried out on an America
VARIAN CARY 50 Probe UV–visible spectrophotometer
with wavelength in range of 300–800 nm.
3. Results and discussion
Fig. 1 displays the XRD pattern of the sample obtained
when I, C and t were 2 mA/cm2, 3.25 ꢀ 10ꢁ6 mol/l and
30 min, respectively. Several main diffraction peaks are
observed at 38.121, 44.341, 64.521, 77.311 (2y), which
correspond to the (111), (200), (220) and (311) reflections of
fcc phase silver (JCPDS card No 4-783). This result
indicates the presence of silver in the sample and the good
crystallinity of the silver product. The XRD peaks are
relatively broad due to the small size of the nanocrystals.
The FWHM of the peaks corresponding to (111), (200),
(220) and (311) reflections are 0.61, 0.65, 0.68 and 0.70,
respectively. According to the well-known Scherrer diffrac-
tion formula (d ¼ kl/b cos y), the average single crystal size
is calculated to be 12 nm (the FWHM datum of four
reflections was all used in the Scherrer equation). A very
broad XRD reflection peak at 221 (2y) is also observed,
which is attributed to the amorphous silica spheres.
Fig. 2a display a TEM image of as-prepared silica
spheres, the individual silica substrates in these images are
spherical in shape, with smooth edges and bare surface.
The silica substrates have a narrow size distribution and an
average diameter of the substrates are about 647 nm.
Further details of the silver–silica nanocomposites, includ-
ing the morphology, the size and the composition, can be
obtained from TEM and HRTEM observations, which are
shown in Figs. 2b–g with gradually increscent resolution of
the sample analyzed in Fig. 1. The TEM image with a
relatively low magnification (Fig. 2b), shows that the
product is very homogeneous. It is observed that the silica
spheres have been coated and the dispersive composite
particles in these images remain spherical in shape with
2. Experimental
The silica spheres used as the substrates were pre-
¨
prepared by the modified StOber method [16]. Typically,
12 ml of ammonia solution was diluted by 64 ml of
anhydrous ethanol in a conical flask and placed in a water
bath at a constant temperature (35 1C). Then another
mixture solution of 12 ml Si(OC2H5)4 and 66 ml anhydrous
ethanol was added to the conical flask drop by drop under
vigorous magnetic stir. Gentle stir continued for 24 h to
ensure that the reaction was complete. A milk suspension
with silica spheres was then separated by means of
centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 5 min, washed with deionized
water and anhydrous ethanol for at least five times.
Subsequently, take these silica spheres as substrates to
prepare Ag/SiO2 composite particles, note that the silica
spheres were used for silver deposition without any further
treatment. Two identical silver slices (the effective surface
area was 2 cm ꢀ 2 cm) were used as the anode and the
cathode, respectively, which were 4 cm apart from each
other. A quadrate insulating electrochemical cell consisting
of two-electrode setup was put inside an ultrasonic cleaner
with its volume of 2 l, in which there was 400 ml of water.
A direct current power supply was an electrophoresis
apparatus trophoresis that maintain a constant current or
voltage. Electrolysis of the 40 ml of slurry consisting of
silica submicrospheres (200–300 mg) and silver perchlorate
(3.25 ꢀ 10ꢁ6 mol/l) was carried out with the current density
of 2 mA/cm2 for 30 min under continuous ultrasonic
radiation with the frequency of 40 kHz and the power of
50 W. The starting pH of the electrolyte solution was 9.01.
Finally, the suspension was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for
5 min. The product was purified successively by five more
centrifugation/rinsing/redispersion steps with deionized
water and anhydrous ethanol and dried at 40 1C for 12 h
in an oven.
Silica
(111)
XRD measurements were performed to investigate the
crystallinity, the average crystal size and the crystal
structure of silver in the resulted products. XRD patterns
of the samples were measured with a D/Max-RA XRD
(200)
(220)
(311)
˚
(using CuKa ¼ 1.5418 A radiation). The size, distribution,
and morphology of silver particles on silica spheres were
studied by TEM) that was performed with a FEI TECNAI
F20 microscope, operating at 200 kV accelerating voltage
and equipped with an EDX detector. The elemental
composition and structural analysis of the products were
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2θ (degrees)
Fig. 1. XRD pattern of the sample synthesized when I, C and t were
2 mA/cm2, 3.25 ꢀ 10ꢁ6 mol/l, and 30 min, respectively.