D.R. Grantier, J.L. Gole / Chemical Physics Letters 330 (2000) 417±422
421
Na2ꢀA1Ru Naꢀ3p ! Na3 e
ꢀ9
These authors were able to con®rm that the sodi-
um trimer ions are produced in associative ion-
ization collisions between sodium dimer and
sodium atoms when both colliding partners are in
their lowest respective electronically excited states.
They also suggest that Na3 can respresent a
dominant ion, especially for higher atom/dimer
densities, due to its relatively low ionization po-
tential (IP Na ꢁ 5:14 eV; Na2 ꢁ 4:87 eV; Na3 ꢁ
3:97 eV) [23±26]. The substantial Na(3p) sodium
atom excited state population and the excitation of
both the A1Ru and the B1Pu sodium dimer states
would at lower expansion ¯ux suggest that mech-
anism (9) can constitute a route for formation of
the Na3 ion, consistent also with the data pre-
sented in Figs. 3 and 4. Therefore, subsequent re-
combination, as in process (5), seems to represent
an equally likely route for production of the 23Pg
state of the sodium dimer.
References
Fig. 4. Comparison of: (a) laser excitation spectrum (from Ref.
[14] with (b) the blue emission (400±560 nm) from the experi-
mental spectrum in Fig. 3. Note the onset of the 23Pg ! 13Ru
[1] J.L. Gole, K.K. Shen, H. Wang, D. Grantier, Invited talk,
in: Proceedings of the 23rd AIAA Plasma-Dynamics and
Laser Science Conference, AIAA 92-2994, Nashville, TN,
1992.
emission band near 435 nm.
[2] D. Grantier, H. Wang, C.B. Winstead, J.L. Gole, in:
Proceedings of the 24th AIAA Plasma Dynamics and
Lasers Conference, Orlando, FL, AIAA, 93-3207, 1993.
[3] D. Grantier, P.M. Medley, J.L. Gole, in: Proceeding of the
Tenth International Symposium on Gas Flow and Chemical
Lasers, Friedrichshafen, Germany, SPIE 2502, 1994, p. 505.
[4] D. Grantier, J.L. Gole, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 98 (1994)
7427.
Na3 e ! NaÃ2ꢀ23Pg Naꢀ3s
ꢀ5
NaÃ2ꢀ23Pg ! Na2ꢀ13Ru hm
While the dominant mechanism for formation of
the Na3 in the reaction sequence (5) remains un-
clear, the Na3 ion may be formed from one of the
following processes:
[5] D. Grantier, Chemically induced Raman scattering, Ph.D.
Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1996.
Naꢀ3p Naꢀ3p ! Na2 e
[6] D. Grantier, J.L. Gole, SPIE Proceedings 2702 (1996) 154.
[7] D. Grantier, J.L. Gole, Rev. Sci. Inst. 67 (1996) 10.
[8] H. Bartels, Z. Phys. 73 (1932) 203.
ꢀ6
Na2 Naꢀ3s; 3p ! Na3
(cf. Ref. [19]).
[9] G. Pichler, J.T. Bahns, K.M. Sando, W.C. Stwalley,
D.D. Konowalow, L. Li, R.W. Field, W. Muller, Chem.
Phys. Lett. 129 (1986) 425.
Naꢀ4d; 5s Na2 ! Na3 e
(cf. Ref. [20]).
ꢀ7
ꢀ8
[10] F.G. Houtermans, Helv. Phys. Acta 33 (1960) 933.
[11] J.P. Woerdmann, Opt. Commun. 26 (1978) 216.
[12] J.T. Bahns, W.C. Stwalley, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44 (1984) 826.
[13] D. Grantier, J.L. Gole, Chem. Phys. 223 (1997) 263.
[14] A. Kopystynska, L. Moi, Phys. Rep. 92 (1982) 135.
[15] G. York, A. Gallagher, JILA Report 114, University of
Colorado, Boulder, 1974.
Na2ꢀC1Pu Naꢀ3p ! Na3 e
(cf. Ref. [21]).
Klavins et al. [22] have also suggested the pro-
duction of Na3 via