118
F.Y. Xie et al. / Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 185 (2012) 112–118
and e). Fig. 3f corresponds to the metallic W which had a sharp edge
of the Fermi level. The O2p and hybridized W5d–O2p disappeared
in the valence band spectrum of metallic W. In conclusion, the XPS
valence band spectra further confirmed the results of W4f core level
XPS spectra.
the long-time gross surface heating of ion bombardment with the
orientated high-energy Ar ion beam emitted by EX05 ion gun.
4. Conclusions
In summary, WO3 nanowire film was reduced to metallic W by
Ar+ bombardment through a complicated process of chemical state
change of tungsten. During Ar+ bombardment the content of W6+
decreased to zero, the contents of the intermediate oxidation states
of W (W5+, W4+, Wx+) increased and then decreased, the content of
W0 increased all the time until the chemical state changed into
metallic W after long-time Ar+ bombardment. Ion-induced reduc-
tion of WO3 should be associated with the varied valence states of
W element besides the preferential sputtering of oxygen.
The different surface morphologies after the different etching
time during Ar+ bombardment on the WO3 nanowire film was
explained by the same mechanism proposed in our previous work.
The WO3 nanowire film itself served as an etching mask to produce
tungsten cone arrays due to the long-time gross surface heating of
ion bombardment with the orientated high-energy Ar ion beam.
3.2. SEM surface morphology characterization
The surface morphologies of the WO3 nanowire film (Fig. 4a)
and the samples obtained from Ar+ bombardment on the same
batch of WO3 nanowire film for different time were investigated
by SEM. Using thermal evaporation method high density WO3
from 50 to 80 nm. The WO3 nanowires had a random distribution
on the surface of the silicon substrate. Though the W4f core level
XPS spectrum changed significantly from narrow doublet peaks to
very broad spectrum shown in Figs. 1 and 2, the morphology of
the sample after 300 s of bombardment was similar with that of
the as-prepared WO3 nanowire film which had a random distribu-
tion without obvious change (Fig. 4b). For the sample after 300 s
of bombardment W6+, W5+, W4+, Wx+, W0 coexisted as shown in
Fig. 2f. For the sample after 500 s of bombardment the morphology
has changed slightly with some of the wires broken or bent by con-
tinuous Ar+ bombardment (Fig. 4c). After 1500 s of bombardment
ion beam bombardment provided enough energy to fuse the bro-
ken wires together (Fig. 4d). The chemical states of W were W0,
Wx+ and W4+ together with a small amount of W5+ and W6+ are
shown in Figs. 1h and 2. The initial morphology of cone arrays
emerged after 3000 s of bombardment. The cones were consisted
of many broken wires fused together with apparent gaps inside
small amounts of other residual W oxidation states (Figs. 1i and 2).
The cones became sharper after 4800 s, and the wires were fur-
ther fused together with gaps smaller than that of the sample after
3000 s (Fig. 4f). Only metallic W was observed after 4800 s. In the
end, metallic tungsten cone arrays with a uniform orientation were
obtained after 8400 s, the wires was completely fused together
without any slit on the cones (Fig. 4g and h) and the tungsten chem-
ical state did not change any more even if ion bombardment time
was increased.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Sci-
ence Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51072236, 21106190), the
Department of Education and Department of Science and Tech-
nology of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 1051027501000094),
the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (Grant
No. 20100171120022), the Research Foundation of Instrumen-
tal Analysis & Research Center of Sun Yat-Sen University (Grant
Nos. IARC 2009005, IARC 2010002), the Analysis Foundation of
Guangzhou Scientific Instrument Network (Grant No. 201003), Fos-
han Research Project (Grant No. 2011BC100023).
References
[1] N.A. Galiote, R.L.T. Parreira, J.M. Rosolen, F. Hugurenin, Electrochem. Commun.
12 (2010) 733–736.
[2] H.J. Chen, N.S. Xu, S.Z. Deng, D.Y. Lu, Z.L. Li, J. Zhou, J. Chen, Nanotechnology 18
(2007) 205701.
[3] T. Tesfamichael, M. Arita, T. Bostrom, J. Bell, Thin Solid Films 518 (2010)
4791–4797.
[4] J. Zhou, Y. Ding, S.Z. Deng, L. Gong, N.S. Xu, Z.L. Wang, Adv. Mater. 17 (2005)
2107–2110.
[5] D. Tanaka, Y. Oaki, H. Imai, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 5286–5288.
[6] Y. Li, Y. Bando, D. Gollberg, Adv. Mater. 15 (2003) 1294–1296.
[7] J. Chen, D.Y. Lu, W.H. Zhang, F.Y. Xie, J. Zhou, L. Gong, X. Liu, S.Z. Deng, N.S. Xu,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 115305.
[8] K.S. Kim, W.E. Baitinger, J.W. Amy, N. Winograd, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat.
Phenom. 5 (1974) 351–367.
[9] R. Holm, S. Storp, Appl. Phys. 12 (1977) 101–112.
[10] R. Holm, S. Storp, Phys. Scripta 16 (1977) 442–447.
[11] S. Hashimoto, A. Tanaka, Surf. Interface Anal. 34 (2002) 262–265.
[12] G. Silversmit, D. Depla, H. Poelman, G.B. Marin, R.D. Gryse, Surf. Sci. 600 (2006)
3512–3517.
[13] K.S. Kim, N. Winograd, Surf. Sci. 43 (1974) 625–643.
[14] N.V. Alov, D.M. Kutsko, K.V. Bordo, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray 2 (2008) 184–188.
[15] H.Y. Wong, C.W. Ong, R.W.M. Kwok, K.W. Wong, S.P. Wong, W.Y. Cheung, Thin
Solid Films 376 (2000) 131–139.
[16] L.M. Qiu, F. Liu, L.Z. Zhao, Y. Ma, J.N. Yao, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (2006)
4931–4935.
[17] F.Y. Xie, L. Gong, X. Liu, J. Chen, W.G. Xie, W.H. Zhang, S.H. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci.
256 (2009) 693–697.
[18] D.Y. Lu, J. Chen, H.J. Chen, L. Gong, S.Z. Deng, N.S. Xu, Y.L. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett.
90 (2007) 041919.
[19] P.M.A. Sherwood, in: D. Briggs, M.P. Seah (Eds.), Appendix 3 in Practical Surface
Analysis, Wiley, 1983, pp. 460–461.
[20] M.C. Biesinger, L.W.M. Lau, A.R. Gerson, R.S.C. Smart, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (2010)
887–898.
[21] D.R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 87th ed., 2006, pp. 5–17.
[22] F.Y. Xie, L. Gong, W.H. Zhang, S.H. Chen, J. Chen, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat.
Phenom., submitted for publication.
[23] R.D. Bringans, H. Hochst, H.R. Shanks, Phys. Rev. B 24 (1981) 3481–3489.
[24] C. Bittencourt, A. Felten, F. Mirabella, P. Ivanov, E. Llobet, M.A.P. Silva, L.A.O.
Nunes, J.J. Pireaux, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17 (2005) 6813–6822.
[25] B.A.D. Angelis, M. Schiavello, J. Solid State Chem. 21 (1977) 67–72.
The morphological change during Ar+ bombardment was in
agreement with the schematic diagram of the ion sputtering pro-
cess proposed in our previous work [17]. In brief, the top ends of
the nanowires served as the etching mask when ion beam bom-
barded the sample. Some of ion beam bombarded the top ends of
the wires to break them down, and the others entered into the gap
between the wires to divide the wires into some clusters. Because
the high-energy Ar+ beam was orientated at an incident angle of
45◦, the nanowires started to be divided into clusters with a cer-
tain direction. The long-time high-energy ion beam bombardment
provided enough energy to fuse the broken wire cluster together
and finally orientated cone arrays was obtained. The main forma-
tion mechanism of the orientated cone arrays was the gross surface
heating produced by ion bombardment. The gross surface heat-
ing of long-time ion bombardment caused the nanowires to be
broken and fused together. The morphological change was much
slower than the change of tungsten chemical states because the
energy used to break the nanowires was provided by gross sur-
face heating of long-time ion beam bombardment whereas W
O
chemical bonds were broken immediately once ion beam hit the
WO3 nanowires film. The uniform orientation of cone arrays was
caused by the fixed incident angle of 45◦ of the high-energy Ar ion
beam. Therefore the formation of the directional cone arrays was