K. Nitta et al. / Electrochimica Acta 55 (2010) 1278–1281
1281
Fig. 7. A cross-sectional SEM image of the electrodeposited tungsten by the poten-
tiostatic electrolysis in the ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–KF–WO3 melt at 0.08 V vs. Zn(II)/Zn for
6 h with the intermitted addition of WO3 every 2 h at 250 ◦C.
Fig. 6. A change of current density during the potentiostatic electrolysis in the
ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–KF–WO3 melt at 0.08 V vs. Zn(II)/Zn for 6 h with the intermitted
addition of WO3 every 2 h at 250 ◦C.
4. Conclusions
A cause of the current decay was revealed for the electrodepo-
sition of tungsten in the ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–KF–WO3 melt at 250 ◦C.
It was found that the soluble tungsten species slowly changes to
insoluble ones. The soluble species was suggested to be WO3F−
anion. One of the insoluble species was confirmed to be ZnWO4
and the other one was suggested to be K2WO2F4. The intermittent
addition of WO3 every 2 h was confirmed to be effective to main-
tain the current density at a high level, which enables to obtain a
thicker tungsten film.
Then, a reaction of tungsten electrodeposition is written as
WO3F− + 6e− = W + 3O2− + F−
(3)
On the other hand, it is predicted that WO3F− anions slowly
change into insoluble ZnWO4. Considering that both zinc and oxy-
gen are necessary to transform WO3F− to ZnWO4, and that the
precipitate should also contain fluorine, the following reaction is
suggested.
Zn2Cl5− + 2WO3F− + 2K+ + 2F−
Acknowledgments
= ZnWO4 + K2WO2F4 + ZnCl3− + 2Cl−
(4)
Here, the unidentified peaks in Fig. 5 are considered to cor-
respond to K2WO2F4. The moderate decrease of current during
the potentiostatic electrolysis can be explained by the decrease of
WO3F− anion according to reaction (4).
This study was partly supported by Industrial Technology
Research Grant Program in 2003 from the New Energy and Indus-
trial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan.
References
3.4. A method to maintain the electrodeposition for a longer
period
[1] Y. Hirata, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 208 (2003) 21.
[2] T. Haga, K. Okada, J. Yorita, Y. Hirata, S. Shimada, ICEP Proceedings, 2002, p. 421.
[3] Y. Hirata, H. Nakaishi, T. Numazawa, H. Takada, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
Proceedings 2, 1997, p. 877.
[4] E.W. Becker, W. Ehrfeld, P. Hagmann, A. Maner, D. Münchmeyer, Microelectron.
Eng. 4 (1986) 35.
[5] A. Rogner, J. Eicher, D. Münchmeyer, R.-P. Peters, J. Mohr, J. Micromech. Micro-
eng. 2 (1992) 133.
[6] J. Hormes, J. Göttert, K. Lian, Y. Desta, L. Jian, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.
B 199 (2003) 332.
From the above discussion, the slow transformation of soluble
tungsten species to insoluble ones was suggested to be the main
reason for the current decrease. However, according to the current
decay curve in Fig. 2, the current density is relatively high in the ini-
tial 2 h. So, it is expected that the electrodeposition proceeds for a
longer period by adding WO3 every 2 h. To confirm this, electrode-
position was conducted under the same condition as Fig. 2 except
for the addition of WO3 every 2 h. The amount of WO3 in every
addition was the same as the initial amount. The current response
is shown in Fig. 6 together with the case of no intermittent addition.
A sharp increase of the current is observed at every addition and the
average current is maintained at the same level as the initial 2 h.
Fig. 7 shows a cross-sectional view of the electrodeposited tung-
sten. The thickness of tungsten layer was approximately 4.2 m and
the current efficiency was calculated to be 90%. So, it is confirmed
that the intermittent addition of WO3 is effective to maintain the
current density at a high level for a long period, which enables us
to obtain a thicker tungsten film.
[7] L. Singleton, J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol. 16 (2003) 413.
[8] S. Sugiyama, Proc. SPIE 5062 (2003) 821.
[9] D. Golodnitsky, N. Gudin, G. Volyanyuk, Plat. Surf. Finish. 2 (1998) 65.
[10] S. Senderoff, G.W. Mellors, Science 153 (1966) 1475.
[11] S. Senderoff, G.W. Mellors, J. Electrochem. Soc. 114 (1967) 586.
[12] A. Katagiri, M. Suzuki, Z. Takehara, J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (1991) 767.
[13] M. Masuda, H. Takenishi, A. Katagiri, J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 (2001) C59.
[14] H. Nakajima, T. Nohira, R. Hagiwara, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 8 (7) (2005)
C91.
[15] H. Nakajima, T. Nohira, R. Hagiwara, K. Nitta, S. Inazawa, K. Okada, Electrochim.
Acta 53 (2007) 24.
[16] K. Nitta, T. Nohira, R. Hagiwara, M. Majima, S. Inazawa, Electrochim. Acta 54
(2009) 4898.
[17] J.J. Watkins, E.C. Ashby, Inorg. Chem. 13 (1974) 2350.
[18] J. Canterford, R. Colton, Halides of the Transition Elements: Halides of the sec-
ond and third Row Transition Metals, vol. 208, Wiley, New York, 1968.