A R T I C L E S
Birkel et al.
temperature. The amount of occupation of interstitials seems
to be sample dependent, thus “Zn4Sb3” has become a generic
term for the group of structurally comparable compounds
Zn6-δSb5 (δ ) 0.62, 0.76),13 Zn3.83Sb3,14 and Zn84Sb65.15
The proposed structures are variants of a Zn6Sb5 basis
structure with structural disorder due to additional Zn interstitials
and Zn vacancies9–12,14 and have been derived from compre-
hensive X-ray diffraction studies and analyses using maximum
entropy methods. Recent inelastic neutron scattering investiga-
tions relate low thermal conductivity not to a phonon glass but
to a soft localized vibration of dumbbell Sb2 units in the Sb
sublattice.4,16
The interdependency of transport properties in ZT makes the
engineering of thermoelectric materials a difficult task. However,
the physics of nanostructures allows varying S, F, and κ
independently, thus enhancing ZT under appropriately selected
conditions. The greatest gains in ZT have been achieved by
introducing interfaces such that phonons are preferentially
scattered relative to electrons. Different approaches to decrease
κph by reducing the mean free path of phonons while maintaining
the electronic properties of doped semiconductors have been
attempted: (i) alloying,17 (ii) nanostructuring,18,19 and (iii) guest
atom inclusion.20,21 Prominent examples of thermoelectric
materials based on the “phonon glass-electron crystal” concept22,23
are the skutterudites22 or “Zn4Sb3” studied here.
One strategy for creating the required scattering interfaces relies
on the synthesis of nanoparticles and multiphase composites mixed
on the nanometer scale. These nanostructured materials can be
formed as thin-film superlattices or as intimately mixed composite
structures. The first demonstration that a low-dimensional material
system could enhance thermoelectric performance was for a 2D
superlattice consisting of PbTe quantum wells, Pb1-xEuxTe barri-
ers,24 and (Bi,Sb)2Te3 superlattices.25,26 Epitaxial-type superlattice
structures are formed, and their sizes can be controlled by phase
separation of metastable ternary compounds into their correspond-
ing binaries.19,20,27,28
The following question thus arises: can we conceive other
materials, based on solidification and decomposition, which may
lead to enhanced ZT-values? Here, we present an extension of
the “solidification and decomposition” approach to thermoelec-
tric materials at the nanoscale using thermolabile “Zn4Sb3” as
the starting compound.
From a synthetic point of view, it is crucial to control the
nanostructure and morphology of these complex binary materials
and their performance in potential thermoelectric applications.
Controlling nanostructure and morphology is important, as they
are critical for the intended applications. Intermetallics are
typically made at high temperatures (usually >1000 °C) with
long annealing times (often days or weeks). Due to the
intrinsically metastable nature of nanoscale matter, we have
devised a low-temperature synthetic route for “Zn4Sb3” nano-
particles, where weakly stabilized Zn and Sb nanoparticles
aggregate to form binary nanocomposites29 reacting subse-
quently to form intermetallic nanocrystals. The synthesis can
be scaled up to yield bulk amounts of material. The novel
solution-based approach uses activated metal nanoparticles as
precursors for the synthesis of a Zn1+xSb nanophase, containing
ZnSb and a new binary phase Zn1+δSb, segregated from a nano-
Zn4Sb3 precursor in a peritectoid reaction.
Traditional single-crystal X-ray diffraction techniques cannot
be applied to nanostructures. Powder X-ray analysis meets
serious problems when the size of the crystals is below 50 nm
and different phases are present in the sample, all attributes of
the Zn-Sb system. Therefore, the crystallographic investigation
was performed using electron diffraction. In contrast to X-rays,
an electron beam can be focused on a very small area allowing
the selection of a single nanocrystal of only a few nanometers.
As scattering factors for electrons are significantly higher in
comparison to X-rays, diffraction information with a reasonable
signal-to-noise ratio can be collected even from such small
volumes. Two types of problems are usually attributed to
electron diffraction data, which diminishes its usability for
structure solution: electron diffraction data often miss a sufficient
number of reflections, and the intensities of the reflections are
strongly modified due to dynamical effects. To overcome these
problems and to develop a well-established routine for electron
diffraction data collection, techniques like automated diffraction
tomography (ADT)30,31 and precession electron diffraction
(PED)32-34 have been developed in the last years. By combining
these two techniques, a rich sampling of the reciprocal space
can be achieved, and thus almost complete quasi-kinematical
electron diffraction data sets can be collected. Mugnaioli et al.35
demonstrated that this method, comprising basically the 3D
reconstruction of the reciprocal space with quasi-kinematical
data, allows solving inorganic structures ab initio in one step.
This data collection/structure solution strategy was applied to
the Zn1+xSb nanophase containing a known ZnSb phase and a
hitherto unknown Zn1+δSb. Both phases were identified by
electron diffraction and high-resolution TEM imaging, and ab
initio structure determinations were performed using combined
ADT/PED.
(17) Kimura, Y.; Zama, A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 103705.
(18) Hsu, K. F.; Loo, S.; Guo, F.; Chen, W.; Dyck, J. S.; Uher, C.; Hogan,
T. P.; Polychroniadis, E. K.; Kanatzidis, M. G. Science 2004, 303,
818–821.
(19) Poudeu, P. F. R.; D’Angelo, J.; Downey, A. D.; Short, J. L.; Hogan,
T. P.; Kanatzidis, M. G. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 3919-3923; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3835-3839.
(20) Nolas, G. S.; Cohn, J. L.; Slack, G. A.; Schujman, S. B. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 1998, 73, 178–180.
Results and Discussion
(21) Keppens, V.; Mandrus, D.; Sales, B. C.; Chakoumakos, B. C.; Dai,
P.; Coldea, R.; Maple, M. B.; Gajewski, D. A.; Freeman, E. J.;
Bennington, S. Nature 1998, 395, 876–878.
Synthesis. Synthesis of the Zn1+xSb nanophase was achieved
through the reaction of “activated” zinc with “activated”
(22) Sales, B. C.; Mandrus, D.; Williams, R. K. Science 1996, 272, 1325–
1328.
(23) Nolas, G. S.; Morelli, D. T.; Tritt, T. M. Annu. ReV. Mater. Sci. 1999,
29, 89–116.
(29) Schlecht, S.; Erk, C.; Yosef, M. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 1693–1697.
(30) Kolb, U.; Gorelik, T.; Kubel, C.; Otten, M. T.; Hubert, D. Ultrami-
croscopy 2007, 107, 507–513.
(24) Hicks, L. D.; Harman, T. C.; Sun, X.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Phys. ReV.
B 1996, 53, R10493.
(31) Kolb, U.; Gorelik, T.; Otten, M. T. Ultramicroscopy 2008, 108, 763–
772.
(25) Martin-Gonzalez, M.; Snyder, G. J.; Prieto, A. L.; Gronsky, R.; Sands,
T.; Stacy, A. M. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 973–977.
(32) Vincent, R.; Midgley, P. A. Ultramicroscopy 1994, 53, 271–282.
(33) Own, C. S. System Design and Verification of the Precession Electron
Diffraction Technique, Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University,
2005.
(26) Caylor, J. C.; Coonley, K.; Stuart, J.; Colpitts, T.; Venkatasubramanian,
R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 023105.
(27) Ikeda, T.; Ravi, V. A.; Snyder, G. J. J. Mater. Res. 2008, 9, 2538–
2546.
(34) Avilov, A.; Kuligin, K.; Nicolopoulos, S.; Nickolskiy, M.; Boulahya,
K.; Portillo, J.; Lepeshov, G.; Sobolev, B.; Collette, J. P.; Martin, N.;
Robins, A. C.; Fischione, P. Ultramicroscopy 2007, 107, 431–444.
(28) Ikeda, T.; Collins, L. A.; Ravi, V. A.; Gascoin, F. S.; Haile, S. M.;
Snyder, G. J. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 763–767.
9
9882 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 28, 2010