083116-3
Rosolen et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 083116 ͑2006͒
−
1
room atmosphere. For a field of 4 V m , the electrode
emitted about 2 A with good stability. The absence of fluc-
tuations in Fig. 4͑b͒ suggests that this observed variation is
associated with some kind of degradation of the CNTs and/or
formation of amorphous carbon.
In conclusion, this letter shows the CNT/BDD/felt elec-
trode to be an excellent field emission electrode. This com-
posite electrode has good mechanical properties and can be
subject to chemical treatments without significant lost of
CNTs. The CNT/BDD/felt is able to emit electrons at volt-
ages in the range of 100–1500 microns at threshold fields
that appear smaller than the most of flat multiwall or single-
wall CNT electrodes prepared at the present time. This ex-
cellent performance is associated with several factors. The
first is due the capacity of the felt substrate to mount large
amounts of BDD films and CNTs on the emission area. An-
other important factor is the low resistance of the electrode.
Poor electrical contact resulting from low adherence of CNTs
or diamond to substrates generally results in a Joule effect
that will provoke degradation or failure of emission. In this
new approach, the resistance between the CNT-carbon is
smaller than CNT-Si or CNT-metal. Third, is the combina-
tion of materials that are capable of emitting together and/or
to act as a channel for emission of electrons, i.e., BDD film
for carbon fiber and CNT for the BDD film. We believe that
the carbon compound presented in this letter opens the door
for the development of alternative sources for generation of
emission devices.
FIG. 4. Variation of emission as function of time current of CNT/BDD/felt
electrode: ͑a͒ As obtained at 2.1 V/m and ͑b͒ at 4 V/m after ͑a͒ run. The
voltage was applied without previous voltage scan on electrode.
distances. The presence of amorphous carbon or impurities
are often said to be responsible for this hysteresis. Both I-V
curves increase monotonically with voltage, with the satura-
tion occurring first for the BDD/felt electrode. For the CNT/
BBD/felt, the saturation seems to occur at higher fields than
the BDD/felt. This result suggests that depending on the ap-
plied field, the emission of the CNT/BBD/felt may be selec-
tively chosen. At shorter gap separation distances, the emis-
sion should be dominated by all forms of carbons of the
composite electrode, while at larger separations the emission
of the electrode should be predominantly influenced by the
CNTs due to the higher-field enhancement factors of these
structures. The CNT/BBD/felt appears thus very efficient for
emission. This combination was able to provide a variation
in the I-V curves that is similar to that observed for single-
wall CNTs, where the I-V curves are found to have a sharp
Some authors ͑J.M.R, S.T., and M.M.͒ thank CAPES
BEX 0278/04-1͒, CNPq, and FAPESP. One of the authors
J.M.R.͒ thanks the University of Surrey for hospitality dur-
ing his sabbatical leaving. The University of Surrey ac-
knowledges the support from the EPSRC Portfolio Partner-
ship project.
͑
͑
1
B. C. Djubua and N. N. Chubum, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 38, 2314
͑1991͒.
2
S. R. P. Silva, G. A. J. Amaratunga, and K. J. Okano, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
B 557, 17 ͑1999͒.
A. Wisitsora-at, W. P. Kang, J. L. Davidson, Q. Li, J. F. Xu, and D. V.
Kerns, Appl. Surf. Sci. 280, 146 ͑1999͒.
Y. H. Chen, C. Ti, and I. N. Lin, Appl. Surf. Sci. 142, 516 ͑1999͒.
Y. Ando, Y. Nishibayashi, H. Furuta, K. Kobashi, T. Hirao, and K. Oura,
Diamond Relat. Mater. 12, 1681 ͑2003͒.
O. M. Küttel, O. Gröning, Ch. Emmenegge, L. Nilsson, L. Maillard
Diederich, and L. Schlapbach, Carbon 745, 37 ͑1999͒.
S. Y. Chen, M. Y. Lee, C. S. Chen, and J. T. Lue, Phys. Lett. A 436, A313
3
4
5
6
6
,11
rise in emission after the threshold field Eth.
7
Finally, Fig. 4 shows the behavior of emission current
versus time for CNT/BDD/felt at two different fields. The
voltage was applied without any previous voltage scans on
the electrodes. The CNT/BDD/felt shows small fluctuations
during the first 3 h of the emission, and then stabilized at
8͑
2003͒.
P. M. Koinkar, R. J. Mahajan, P. P. Patil, and M. A. More, Thin Solid
Films 275, 474 ͑2005͒.
9
0
E. C. Almeida, N. G. Ferreira, and J. M. Rosolen, Diamond Relat. Mater.
1
E. C. Almeida, A. V. Diniz, J. M. Rosolen, and N. G. Ferreira, Diamond
Relat. Mater. 14, 679 ͑2005͒.
4, 1673 ͑2005͒.
1
−
1
0.2 A at 2.1 V m . After the first run in Fig. 4͑a͒, the
11
sample was removed from the chamber and then subject to
emission tests after long-term exposure to air for a day at
J. M. Bonard, M. Croci, C. Klinke, R. Kurt, O. Noury, and N. Weiss,
Carbon 40, 1715 ͑2002͒.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
28.252.67.66 On: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:52:50
1