D134
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 159 (2) D129-D134 (2012)
Cu to Cu2O and CuO respectively. In addition to these characteristics
responses of I-V curve χ , the I-V curve σ shows 5 anodic peaks at
−1.07 V, −0.796 V, 0.03V, 0.78V, 1.21 V (SCE) respectively assumed
to be corresponding to the oxidation of hydrogen, Ga or Ga2O3 strip-
ping, oxidation of remaining Cu to Cu2O and CuO and oxidation or
striping of the CuGa intermetallics.
solid state reaction with Me at a faster rate than the sample stored at
lower temperature.
Our study shows that if at. wt% of Me ꢀ Ga, then an equilibrium
compound of MexGa is formed where x>1. However, if at. wt%
Ga>> Me then the equilibrium compound of GaMe (1:1) is formed
and remaining Ga diffused into the next layer (in this case Mo). We
found that TaN acts as an effective diffusion barrier layer to the gallium
diffusion.
The Ga-intermetallics formed after alloying could be identified
using Linear Sweep Voltammetric Stripping. The anodic stripping
peak of CuGa shift towards the more positive potential (more noble)
but in AuGa system the anodic peaks are shift to a negative (less
noble) potential.
A cross-section SEM image and x-ray spectrum of electroplated ∼
100 nm gallium on glass/Mo/Cu substrate captured after 10.08×104
s at the end of electroplating are shown in Fig 7. The samples were
held at room temperature (17–20◦C) during the aging period. It can
be seen from the XRD data that Ga readily diffuses to the Cu and Mo
layers and forms CuGa, CuGa2 and GaMo3 intermetallics during self-
annealing. The SEM image (Fig. 7a) shows an irregular penetration of
gallium or its alloys with copper into the Mo layers. Sputtered Mo has
a columnar structure and its grain boundaries normal to the substrate
are considered to be a potential path for the diffusion of Ga or its
alloys. As gallium and copper are lower melting point metals than
Mo, their diffusion coefficients are expected to be higher and thus
diffuse to the Mo very readily. However, when Ga was plated on a
substrate containing a TaN barrier layer (Fig. 3) there was no Ga-Mo
alloy detected even after 5.184×106 s aging. Therefore, TaN acts as
a diffusion barrier for gallium. Since major peaks of Mo-Ga phases
overlap with the peaks of Mo and GaCu, it is hard to distinguish
Mo-Ga phases in the XRD spectrum. However SIMS and chemical
analysis at the nanoscale using a TEM/EDS, confirmed that the Ga
diffused into the Mo.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully thank Andrew Kellock at the IBM Almaden
Research Center and the Materials Research Laboratory (MRL) at the
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center.
References
1. Pierre de la Breteque, Industrial and engineering chemistry, Vol. 56(6), 54 (1964).
2. K. Wade and A. J. Banister, The Chemistry of aluminum, gallium, indium, and
thallium, Pergamon Texts in Inorganic Chemistry Volume 12, Pergamon Press, 1975.
3. Teng Li, Yong-Gang Lv, Jing Lui, and Yi-Xin Zhou, Forschung im Ingenieurwesen,
70(4), 243–251 (2005).
4. S. V. Garimella, Y. K. Joshi, A. Bar-Cohen, R. Mahajan, K. C. Toh, V. P. Baelmans,
J. Lohan, B. Sammakia, and F. Andros, IEEE Trans.On Components and Packaging
Technologies, 25(4) 569–575, (2002).
5. K. Wade and A. J. Banister, Pergamon Texts in Inorganic Chemistry Volume 12,
University of Durham, Pergamon Press, 1975.
6. S. Moorthy Babu, L. Durai, R Dhanasekaran, and P. Ramasamy, Bull. Mater. Sci.,
13(1&2), 43–49 (1990).
A SIMS profile plotted with thickness (nm) vs. secondary ion
intensity (c/s) of the sample (Fig. 7) shows the depth profiles of Ga,
Mo and Cu (Fig. 8a). The first ∼100 nm of the top surface is gallium
rich. However, as the depth penetration progresses the concentration
of Ga is rich up to ∼50 nm inside the Mo layer and then falls off.
The SIMS profile also shows that both Ga and Cu diffuse into the Mo
through out entire thickness of the 600 nm Mo.
The sample was further analyzed by TEM and EDS as shown in
Fig. 8b–8d. The composition, measured by EDS along the line shown
by an arrow in Fig. 8b, is plotted as a function of the thickness vs. the
number of counts (Fig. 8c). The first 15 nm of the profile were on the
organic coating layer and thus shows no counts for Ga, Cu and Mo
(Fig. 8c). Further along the profile, 25–35 nm from the surface into the
Mo layers shows a high concentration of Ga. These data agree with
the data obtained by SIMS. However, further along the profile, within
the Mo shows only the presence of Mo which does not quite agree
with the SIMS data. The discrepancy between the EDS and SIMS data
could be explained by the limited sampling size of EDS compared to
the SIMS. In addition, SIMS has lower detection limits. The Ga and
Cu observed in the Mo layer by SIMS may be in the intergranular
region and the EDS may have been done on individual Mo column.
One final explanation may be found in the image in Fig 8d. We
observed islands forming on the Mo layer and these islands contained
Cu while next to the island no Cu is detected, only Mo and Ga.
However, why the copper accumulated in a localized bump yet has to
be resolved by a further study.
7. P. K. Pendey, S. N. Sahu, and S. Chandra, Editors, Hands book of Semiconductor
Electrodeposition, pp. 206, Marcel Dekker, New York 1996.
8. S Chandra and Neeraj Khare, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 2, 214–219 (1987).
9. M Contreras et al., Prog. Photovolt., 7, 311–316 (1999).
10. R Wieting, AIP Conf. Proc., 462, 3–8 (1999).
11. R. M. Burgess, W. S. Chen, W. E. Devaney, D. H. Doyle, N. P. Kim, and B. J.
Stanbery, “Electron and proton radiation effects on GaAs and CUInSe2 thin film
solar cells,” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 1988, Conference Record of the
Twentieth IEEE, 2, 909 (1988).
12. A Jasenek et al., Thin Solid Films, 387, 228–230 (2001).
13. W.
Chen
et al.,
Photovoltaic
Specialists
Conference,
377,
1987,
1445
Conference
Record
of
the Nineteenth
IEEE,
(1987).
14. T. Takahashi et al., J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 8, 882 (1989).
15. Z. Marinkovic and V. Simic, Thin Solid Films, 217, 26–30 (1992).
16. V. Simic and Z. Marinkovic, Thin Solid Films, 34, 179–183 (1976).
17. S. Nakahara and E. Kinsbron, Thin Solid Films, 113, 15–26 (1984).
18. M. Purwins, R. Enderle, M. Schmid, P. Berwian, G. Muller, F. Hergert, S. Jost, and
R. Hock, Thin Solid Films, 515, 5895–5898 (1976).
19. R. S. Crisp, W. G. Henry, P. A. Schroeder, and R. W. Wilson, Journal of chemical
and Engineering data, 11(4), 556 (1966).
20. A. Kampmann, J. Rechid, A. Raitzig, S. Wulff, M. Mihhailova, R. Thyen, and K.
Kalberlah, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 763, B8.5.1 (2003).
21. Yusuke Oda, Takashi Minemoto, Hideyuki Takakura, and Yoshihiro Hamakawa,
Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 1012, Y12–39 (2007).
22. M. Ganchev, J. Kois, M. Kaelin, S. Bereznev, E. Tzvetkova, O. Volobujeva, N.
Stratieva, A. Tiwari, Thin Solid Films, 511 – 512, 325 – 327 (2006).
23. I. M. Dharmadasa, N. B. Chaure, G. J. Tolan, and A. P. Samantilleke, J. Electrochem.
Soc, 154(6), H466–H471 (2007).
Conclusions
The solid state reaction of electroplated Ga thin films with Me (Me
= Cu, Au) have been observed during aging at room temperature.
The stoichiometry of the resulting equilibrium compounds depends
on the ratio of at. wt% of both Ga and Me as well as the time of
diffusion. We observed that the increase of room temperature closer
to the melting point of gallium (29.7◦C) accelerated its diffusion and
24. G. Hanket, W. Shafarman, and R. Birkmire, Proc. WCPEC-4, 560 (2006).
25. S. Z. Bokshtein, Structure and Properties of Metal Alloys [in Russian], Metallurgiya,
Moscow 53 (1971).
26. Z. Marinkovic and V. Simic, J. Less-Common Met., 115, 225 (1986).
Downloaded on 2014-06-19 to IP 155.198.30.43 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).