CHEMCATCHEM
FULL PAPERS
460 spectrometer equipped with a diffuse reflectance attachment
developed earlier at the N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemis-
try, Moscow.[23] To have a satisfactory signal-to-noise ratio, 500
spectra were collected. CaF2 powder was used as a reference.
Before the spectroscopic measurements, the samples were evacu-
ated at 4008C for 2 h to remove physically adsorbed water. The fol-
lowing probe molecules were used to test surface sites of different
nature: CO as a probe for Lewis acid sites and low-coordinated
metal ions, and CD3CN as a probe for both Lewis and Brønsted (if
present) acid sites. The probe molecules were adsorbed at RT and
an equilibrium pressure of 5 Torr (1 Torr=133.3 Pa) for CO and of
96 Torr for CD3CN (saturated pressures).
ity tests were performed at different temperatures, ranging from
50 to 5008C. The temperature in the reactor was ramped with
a step size of 508C until a 100% CO conversion was achieved.
After that, the temperature was decreased stepwise to return to
the starting point of the conversion cure at which zero conversion
was observed. The feed gas mixture consisted of 4.5 vol% CO,
22.5 vol% O2, and He balance. The total feed flow rate was held
constant at 10 cm3 minꢀ1, with a volume hourly space velocity of
6000 hꢀ1. The turnover frequency was calculated as the number of
moles of CO converted per mole of the supported peroxide per
hour.
The effluent gas mixture from the reactor was analyzed with a gas
chromatograph equipped with a thermal conductivity detector
and a molecular sieve 5A column to determine CO conversion.
The phase composition of the samples and the particle size of the
supported metal were determined from XRD analysis. The XRD pat-
terns were recorded with a DRON-2 diffractometer with Ni-filtered
CuKa radiation (l=0.1542 nm) in a step-scanning mode, with
a step size of 0.028 and a counting time of 0.6 sstepꢀ1 at 2q=10–
858. All major reflections were covered in this scan range. The
phases were identified by comparing the position and intensity of
the lines with the data from the files of the International Center for
Diffraction Data. To estimate precisely the average particle size of
the phases, the diffraction patterns were recorded at 2q=35–508,
with a step size of 0.028 and a counting time of 1.2 sstepꢀ1. The
crystal sizes of the nanoparticles were determined from X-ray line
broadening analysis.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from HASYLAB (DESY, Germany) that
made it possible to perform X-ray absorption spectroscopy stud-
ies, project I-20060226 EC, and the Ministry of Science and Educa-
tion of the Russian Federation (project nos. 8441 and
16.513.11.3024). The use of a unique setup with microwave acti-
vation for catalyst preparation is acknowledged.
The X-ray absorption (XANES and EXAFS) spectra (Co K edge at
7709 eV and Ni K edge at 8333 eV) were measured at the Hasylab
X1 station (Hamburg, Germany) with a Si(111) double crystal mon-
ochromator. The spectra were recorded in the transmission mode
at ꢀ1968C. The spectrum of the Co or Ni foil was registered simul-
taneously between the second and third ionization chambers for
energy calibration. The EXAFS data analysis was performed with
the VIPER software.[24] The reference spectra were recorded by
using standard reference compounds: CoO, Co3O4, Co foil, NiO,
and Ni foil. The required scattering amplitudes and phase shifts
were calculated with the ab initio FEFF8.10 code.[25] Fitting was per-
formed in the k and r spaces.
Keywords: carbon monoxide
lanthanum · oxidation · perovskites
· heterogeneous catalysis ·
[1] R. J. Farrauto, C. H. Bartholomew, Fundamentals of Industrial Catalytic
Processes, Blackie Academic&Professional, London, 1997.
[3] M. O’Connell, A. K. Norman, C. F. Huettermann, M. A. Morris, Catal.
[5] M. P. Pechini, U.S. Patent no. 3,330,697, 1967.
[6] S. Sun, M. Rebeilleau-Dassonneville, X. Zhu, W. Chu, W. Yang, Catal.
The XPS spectra were recorded with a XSAM 800 spectrometer
with a MgKa X-ray (1253.6 eV) source. The base pressure in the XPS
chamber was approximately 10ꢀ9 Torr. The spectrometer was cali-
brated by the BE of the Au4f7/2 component (84.0 eV) and the
Ni2p3/2 component (852.7 eV). The XPS survey spectra were collect-
ed between 20 and 1130 eV. The detailed spectra were recorded
for the region of C1s, O1s, Co2p, Ni2p, Ni3p, Fe2p, La3d, and
Zr3d, with a step size of 0.1 eV. The C1s line at 285.0 eV was used
as the internal standard. The surface atomic composition was cal-
culated by using the photoionization cross sections.
´
´
´
ˇ
´
[12] S. Petrovic, V. Rakic, D. M. Jovanovic, A. T. Baricevic, Appl. Catal. B-Envi-
ron. 2006, 66, 249.
[15] S. Cimino, S. Colonna, S. de Rossi, M. Faticanti, L. Lisi, I. Pettiti, P. Porta,
Catalyst testing in CO oxidation
[16] R. Newton, S. H. Magalh¼es, F. S. Toniolo, V. Teixeira da Silva, M. Schmal,
Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2010, 388, 216.
The synthesized powders were pressed into discs in a stainless
steel module (diameter: 15 mm) under a hydraulic pressure of
10 MPa. The tablets were then crushed and sieved into particles of
sizes ranging from 0.25 to 0.1 mm for characterization and catalytic
tests. Catalyst testing was performed in a laboratory-scale fixed-
bed quartz reactor (internal diameter: 3 mm) operating at an at-
mospheric pressure. The catalyst was placed on a thin layer of
quartz wool in the reactor. In each test, the catalyst volume was
0.1 cm3. Before testing, each catalyst was pretreated in a dry air
flow at 3008C for 1 h to remove water and adsorbed impurities,
and then the reactor was cooled to RT. The reactor temperature
was monitored with a thermocouple in the catalyst layer. The activ-
[17] W. Jin, Sh. Li, P. Huang, N. Xu, J. Shi, Y. S. Lin, J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 66, 51.
[20] V. A. Sadykov, L. A. Isupova, I. A. Zolotarskii, L. N. Bobrova, A. S. Noskov,
V. N. Parmon, E. A. Brushtein, T. V. Telyatnikova, V. I. Chernyshev, V. V.
[21] E. V. Makshina, Thesis of Cand. Sci. Dissertation, Moscow State Univ.,
2008.
[24] K. V. Klementiev, VIPER for Windows (Visual Processing in EXAFS Research-
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1990 – 1997 1996