J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 87 [3] 358–64 (2004)
journal
Monoclinic Zirconia Bodies by Thermoplastic Ceramic Extrusion
†
‡
,‡
,†
Gerd Scheying, Ingrid W u¨ hrl, Ulrich Eisele,* and Ralf Riedel*
Department of Materials Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Corporate Materials Research, Robert Bosch GmbH (FV/FLW), 70049 Stuttgart, Germany
Two ultrafine, undoped ZrO powders with median primary
polar powder surface–nonpolar organic vehicle interface. Dispers-
ing agents are widely used in ceramic-forming technology to
overcome described effects and many are commercially available.
2
particle sizes of 9 and 25 nm were used to prepare ceramic
suspensions for thermoplastic extrusion. The organic vehicle
consisted of an industrial-grade poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)
7
A new way of calculating the amount of required dispersing aid
is presented here. The model allows the exact determination of the
amount of dispersant needed based on the specific amount of
molecular dispersant chemisorbed on the powder surface. Beyond
this it takes into account that a certain dispersing aid/vehicle
(polymer or high molecular wax) ratio is needed for melt flow
(
EVA) or polyethylene (PE-HD) and decanoic acid as a dis-
persing agent. The powder volume loadings achieved were
4% and 52% by volume for the two powders, respectively.
4
The amount of dispersant needed was calculated from a new
model based on available chemisorption sites on the powder
surface. Mixing and extrusion were conducted using a conven-
tional modular plastic processing unit. Green bodies were
dewaxed up to 450°C in an inert atmosphere and sintered to
full density in air at 1060° and 1100°C, respectively. Analysis
of the ceramic phase content and the microstructure of the
bodies is presented.
8
reasons of a given ceramic suspension.
CIM using a thermoplastic vehicle is already widely used as a
standard process in ceramic green forming like tape casting or
9
pressing. Extrusion, on the other hand, is mostly done with
aqueous systems. This paper describes thermoplastic extrusion of
nanoscale powders where mixing and forming have been con-
ducted using industrial thermoplast processing equipment de-
signed for blending and shaping polymers, albeit using higher
temperature and torque.
I. Introduction
Although pore diameters of the prepared nanostructured speci-
men are well below 10 nm, debinding is possible without disrupt-
ing samples having a wall thickness of 5 mm. This is in contrast to
prior ascertainments of many authors who claim that debinding
from pores smaller than ϳ100 nm is only feasible in “infinite
ENERAL thermodynamic and kinetic considerations of ceramic
G
sintering processes demand the use of ultrafine (i.e.,
nanoscale) powders to lower the sintering temperature significant-
1
ly. In the case of pure monoclinic ZrO (m-ZrO ), grain sizes in
2
2
a low nanometer range are necessary for pressureless sintering to
full density. The monoclinic-to-tetragonal phase transition of ZrO2
at about 1150°C induces microcracking on cooling due to the
associated specific volume change. Therefore, the sintering tem-
perature must be kept below this point.
10–13
time,” i.e., impossible without damaging samples.
Although several publications describe the use of nanopowders
14–16
for production of ceramic bodies,
to our knowledge there is
no published work about a similar industry compliant and eco-
nomic process like the one outlined here.
Many industry compliant production routes for nanoscale ce-
ramic powders with output rates of several kilograms per day have
2
,3
been developed recently. The undoped ZrO powders used here
2
II. Experimental Procedure
were manufactured via flame pyrolysis and a controlled growth
reaction under hydrothermal conditions. Both powders contain a
substantial amount of tetragonal phase which is thermodynami-
(1) Materials
Details of the ceramic powders and organic materials are given
in Tables I and II, respectively. MZ1 is commercially produced by
Degussa-Huels (Hanau), and MZ2 is a ceramic powder supplied by
the Institut fuer Neue Materialien (Saarbruecken). MZ1 is manu-
factured by the Aerosil™ process where ZrCl (instead of SiCl ) is
4
cally stable under ambient conditions due to particle size.
Besides the starting grain size, a homogeneous dispersion of
primary particles and a sufficient volume loading of powder in the
ceramic green body are necessary prerequisites for densification at
4
4
5
a given low temperature. Volume loadings of at least 50% should
injected into an oxyhydrogen flame to be pyrolyzed to small
17
be achieved.
crystalline ZrO2 grains (instead of amorphous SiO2). MZ2 is
produced by a hydrothermal growth process from organic zirco-
nium compounds. Details of this powder preparation are given
Most attempts to incorporate powders with high specific surface
areas (SBET), like the material used here, into an organic vehicle
have failed because of powder–vehicle interactions. Since both
phases are initially incompatible, segregation or even separation is
observed during mixing, or when specimens are reheated for
1
8
elsewhere. Both powders contain a substantial amount of tet-
ragonal phase because of their small particle size.
Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA), polyethylene (PE-HD),
and decanoic acid (98%) (DA) are of industrial grade supplied by
BASF AG, Hoechst AG, and Aldrich, respectively. According to
the manufacturer, EVA contains 12 wt% vinyl acetate. All other
data shown in Table II were determined experimentally.
6
dewaxing. This is generally a problem for almost every existing
I-W. Chen—contributing editor
(2) Pretreatment of Powders, Surface Modification,
Compounding, and Extrusion
Both powders were washed before compounding. In the case of
MZ1, washing with NH3 solution at pH 10 reduced the acidic
chloride content, due to residues from production from ZrCl , from
0.4 wt% down to Ͻ100 ppm. MZ2 was washed with concentrated
Manuscript No. 188424. Received September 1, 2000; approved October 15, 2003.
Based in part on the dissertation submitted by G. Scheying for the doctoral degree
in materials science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany,
1
999.
Supported by German Federal Grant (bmbϩf) under Grant No. 03M2744A5.
4
*
Member, American Ceramic Society.
Darmstadt University of Technology.
Robert Bosch GmbH.
†
‡
H O solution (35%) to reduce the carbon residues from the
2
2
3
58